Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Re: Privacy Question: Can volatile RAM still contain evidence?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries Guest

    Re: Privacy Question: Can volatile RAM still contain evidence?

    GreenXenon wrote:

    <multi-posted dissertation snipped>

    At least everyone in 24hoursupport.helpdesk didn't have to endure the
    additional four posts' worth of typo corrections...unlike the hapless
    souls in alt.privacy.spyware.

    Whatever it is you've done that you don't want anyone to find out about
    must be heinous, but even if it isn't, I can only hope that they lock
    you up and throw away the key so that you cannot inflict such as this on
    other innocent souls.

    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

    "You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
    William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court



  2. #2
    GreenXenon Guest

    Re: Privacy Question: Can volatile RAM still contain evidence?

    On Dec 21, 7:08 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
    wrote:

    > Whatever it is you've done that you don't want anyone to find out about
    > must be heinous, but even if it isn't, I can only hope that they lock
    > you up and throw away the key so that you cannot inflict such as this on
    > other innocent souls.


    y r u so angry at me?

  3. #3
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries Guest

    Re: Privacy Question: Can volatile RAM still contain evidence?

    GreenXenon wrote:
    > On Dec 21, 7:08 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Whatever it is you've done that you don't want anyone to find out
    >> about must be heinous, but even if it isn't, I can only hope that
    >> they lock you up and throw away the key so that you cannot inflict
    >> such as this on other innocent souls.

    >
    > y r u so angry at me?


    I'm not.

    It's all usenet-style rhetoric, except for the following:

    1. Don't multi-post.

    2. Don't proofread your posts /after/ you send them and then force
    everyone to read additional posts with nothing but typo corrections.

    3. If it's illegal, don't do it. Then you won't have to worry about
    getting
    caught, and posts such as those you made will be unnecessary.

    --
    Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

    "You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
    William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court



  4. #4
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Privacy Question: Can volatile RAM still contain evidence?

    From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <nimue@databasix.com>

    | GreenXenon wrote:
    >> On Dec 21, 7:08 pm, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com>
    >> wrote:


    >>> Whatever it is you've done that you don't want anyone to find out
    >>> about must be heinous, but even if it isn't, I can only hope that
    >>> they lock you up and throw away the key so that you cannot inflict
    >>> such as this on other innocent souls.


    >> y r u so angry at me?


    | I'm not.

    | It's all usenet-style rhetoric, except for the following:

    | 1. Don't multi-post.

    To add to that....
    And don't post Off Topic. This is Usenet, not a chat room -- spell out words.


    --
    Dave
    http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
    Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •