"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:A9GdnduDX8eh59jUnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@giganews.com ...
> It doesn't work that way. The same way Bochner couldn't do anything about
> the WinFixer
> group. It took the FTC.
>
> In this case it may be an IP issue that Nick would have to take action on.
Um, no. Once again there are organizations I could go report this to and
they would investigate and they would take care of reporting it to the FTC.
Just because it is in SA doesn't mean only Nick can file a complaint and I
question why you are trying to make me believe that BS. Computer crimes are
a federal offense punishable by hefty fines and/or jail time now. It is not
a simple case of going on the Judge Judy show anymore. Their only protection
is if they are off-shore and hard to get at, Zango has already been in
trouble with the FTC. It's possible he downloaded a file that someone else
hacked into SA and not Zango themselves. It would be extremely stupid of
them to continue with these illegal activities if they are already well
known to the FTC. Next time they won't be so light on them. And why are you
trying to obfuscate the matter. Is it because you have a vested interest in
malware? It would make sense that you like malware because it keeps you in
business maybe. A spammer in Canada was recently fined over 30 million
dollars. Has that got you scared or what?


Reply With Quote