Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Strange results from MBAM

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    wasted Guest

    Re: Strange results from MBAM



    "Andy Walker" <awalker@nspank.invalid> wrote in message
    news:49415fd2.67919046@news.webtv.com...
    > wasted wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>"Andy Walker" <awalker@nspank.invalid> wrote in message
    >>news:493fb161.344733921@news.webtv.com...
    >>> wasted wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Just discovered from a sequence of Googling that a folder named as
    >>>>"Protection" is created by some malware or other, which is why it is
    >>>>flagged. Renaming my folder has stopped it being flagged.
    >>>
    >>> Where was the folder located? I've seen more than a few people come
    >>> in to the group asking about this and it would be good information to
    >>> have for the next request...
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> It's odd that renaming a folder could change a registry setting...
    >>> unless there is a program in memory that monitors the folder and makes
    >>> the registry change. I suppose MBAM could be reporting a false
    >>> positive based on what it thinks the registry entry would be if the
    >>> folder existed... which seems to me to be a bug if that's the case.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>> Andy

    >>See my original post Andy - the location is mentioned already. It is, or
    >>was, off
    >>the Start menu folder.

    >
    > Ok, but that could mean a number of different locations depending upon
    > what you mean by "start menu". You also have (at least) two different
    > locations where the folder could reside "All Users" and "current_user"
    > are two of the most used. If you don't know the exact location then
    > that's fine, I just thought it would be useful to know the exact
    > location.
    >
    >> I hadn't seen any previous references here (if by
    >>"here" you mean alt.privacy.spyware). I only found one reference to it
    >>elsewhere through Googling.

    >
    > The reply I originally gave you was a cut-and-paste from one of my
    > prior posts on the subject. It's possible that the x-no-archive flag
    > was set on the post, though, because I normally honor the x-no-archive
    > when responding. That would remove it from Google after a few days.


    Ah - didn't think about there being a Start Menu for other users - because
    I'm the only user so never see that

    the full path was C:/Program Data/Microsoft/Windows/Start
    Menu/Programs/Protection




  2. #2
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Strange results from MBAM

    Andy Walker <awalker@nspank.invalid> wrote in news:493fb161.344733921
    @news.webtv.com:

    > wasted wrote:
    >
    >>Just discovered from a sequence of Googling that a folder named as
    >>"Protection" is created by some malware or other, which is why it is
    >>flagged. Renaming my folder has stopped it being flagged.

    >
    > Where was the folder located? I've seen more than a few people come
    > in to the group asking about this and it would be good information to
    > have for the next request...
    >
    >
    > It's odd that renaming a folder could change a registry setting...
    > unless there is a program in memory that monitors the folder and makes
    > the registry change. I suppose MBAM could be reporting a false
    > positive based on what it thinks the registry entry would be if the
    > folder existed... which seems to me to be a bug if that's the case.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Andy
    >


    Well, If I wasn't killfiled by you, I'd explain what's going on. But,
    no it's not a bug.


    --
    Regards,
    Dustin Cook
    Malware Researcher
    MalwareBytes - http://www.malwarebytes.org



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •