Re: a-squared Anti-Malware 3.5 Free Today @ GOTD

[Me Here]

Ron wrote:
> http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/a-sq...ti-malware-35/

Just a heads-up...

Damn, was hoping it was free forever... From the site:

NB: This download includes full technical support and updates for 1 year.

Even though a year is a reasonably long time, this is really trialware
and it's still going to have to be paid for in the end (a bit like
shareware) unless you opt to find something else (I hate that).

Also, you have to register and create an account to be able to use the
program which means, more spam/junk mail and ads in your mailbox.


--

As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both
instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly
unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of
change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of
the darkness. -- Justice William O. Douglas

================================================== ==========
The alt.comp.freeware Clown Club:

Ari (Forger)
elaich (XNews Zealot)
iNcReDuLoUs (Sporger)
polaris (Sockpuppet)
»Q« (Obfuscator)
Ron May (Oxygen Thief)
Susan Bugher (Menopausal Mammy)
Yrrah (Scourger)

[Ron]

On Aug 2, 9:33*am, Me Here <me.h...@home.on.the.net> wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> >http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/a-sq...ti-malware-35/
>
> Just a heads-up...
>
> Damn, was hoping it was free forever... *From the site:
>
> NB: This download includes full technical support and updates for 1 year.
>
> Even though a year is a reasonably long time, this is really trialware
> and it's still going to have to be paid for in the end (a bit like
> shareware) unless you opt to find something else (I hate that).
>
> Also, you have to register and create an account to be able to use the
> program which means, more spam/junk mail and ads in your mailbox.

Oh well, still free for a yr, is better than nothing.

And I have a Yahoo dummy account that I *always* use when I have
to sign up for things, so no biggie there.

[Andy Walker]

Me Here wrote:

>Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAYAAABXAvmHAAAAAX NSR0IArs4c6QAAAARnQU1B
> AACxjwv8YQUAAAAgY0hSTQAAeiYAAICEAAD6AAAAgOgAAHUwAA DqYAAAOpgAABdwnLpRPAAAABh0
> RVh0U29mdHdhcmUAUGFpbnQuTkVUIHYzLjIwWZ92UQAAAftJRE FUaEPtWAuqwzAM6+5/6O11EDB+
> kuwkdiGwQmH0s1iWLDt9Xdf1/juPPm4AJ599wb/B0ZCsHgB37Hew4xi/jwVggRSD6GHAZr+ZhR4A
> SP9DVscxYPXfAOLHAO0hXkZNTtTPgLfTY2rAO9GPATzy9EgI9Y GmZtYDwBZwk3SGefQBQLPQMX3g
> oUHuu5cp3wsgraPptGjtPgCsDopl1AMAZdeyUJT9Ogn54GyW1b 0CIHsMsOCY5ytgi2BqAPjFfdGq
> JoZATYD5DwBNkewPVUH6oP2z6N0Ft8IARsCq8NBi7JoCo2SYYI Iz4EFEzoKCtNcy+l+QE64B7+Fo
> nkFSQ9pnI4VaY8JyNQC0GfFZYkD8dSUvNr0uSchKh0lALejfQR qfAROA0DaqAGRAROxE8tpiQG0J
> kdZR5tlzbFr1dYGs1oHKNTLlJkjrSv8q64jVLQlFLKjgmcSU7y PJbQPwRR3pNgsqm5wSAFExsqAV
> C8ydUH8QIHI1wFiYcSLbDDPB27orAYAKOVvAGYaUpEoA+AwqK1 VgGRPMuUpqIOrOWSaKLXR9SzmT
> /aiZRXZbyoBiIgpU+T/Sf2KMWGcA1UNWRlkHegQAmn8iu4zuJ+2z7tvoSuYjFpLZ35OQr Ycoq8h9
> 1DuPAsh041mAjwOwCzJ5ZEBMBF5XAwuLln0R/wCWR5o69Hvv3wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

As an aside; I cleaned up your X-Face cus it's so fricken huge. Use it
if you like it.

X-Face:
RZ[VoTFoLeCj8#HdGx.,={jy\ijjxx?K`!'6\CE|%[bz`Qc*x'HQg"YMSk,<tV0d,D^uK'm

pVSfW".~2>B|_AaCrh7\T`93x|6{`3=PR^VJNRQaOplc_g/7c<]N+Js-@&hQlftF@P9_".FKNoc4&Y
&a'M5kM09B`znkO}AEkK`oT`{TYzMu*j@N)lDfs

[Ant]

"Andy Walker" wrote:

> As an aside; I cleaned up your X-Face cus it's so fricken huge. Use it
> if you like it.

Well, it's a 'Face:' not an 'X-Face:', which is actually a base64
encoded PNG image.

[Andy Walker]

Ant wrote:

>"Andy Walker" wrote:
>
>> As an aside; I cleaned up your X-Face cus it's so fricken huge. Use it
>> if you like it.
>
>Well, it's a 'Face:' not an 'X-Face:', which is actually a base64
>encoded PNG image.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. I must have missed "Face:" becoming
a standard header. It seems a lot less efficient than an x-face.