On 10 mei, 03:07, Kayman <kaymanDeleteT...@operamail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 23:48:56 -0700 (PDT), rodney.use...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 9 mei, 06:36, Straight Talk <b__n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> You really can't rely on online scanners.
>
> > Could you explain why online scanners are not reliable ?
>
> On-line scanners are the most unsafe and next to useless. Because by the
> time you've started your infected Windows and connected to the
> Internet via this infected code base, and start to look for scanning sites
> through infected DNS, you are almost certain to have the malware
> perfectly positioned to overrule your attempts to clean it.

that makes sense

> David's Multi-AV is *better and safer*, because you don't have to be
> on-line to use it (it has no dependencies on using a web browser to perform
> its function), and it can be used in Safe Mode.
>
> http://pcdid.com/Multi_AV.htm

Thanks, already use that. I'm almost dissappointed that none of the
AV's ever find anything.