On Mar 20, 1:13 pm, "What's in a Name?" <maxwach...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> this jewel innewsoKdnaqDs4bUlnzanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>
>
> > What's in a Name? wrote:
> >> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> >> this jewel innews:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.co m:
>
> >>> Does anyone here use it?
> >>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
> >>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
> >>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
> >>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
> >>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
> >>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
> >>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
> >>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>
> >> If you select "start with windows", the free version will
> >> auto-update itself. I do not have that option checked because of
> >> limited RAM on the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop,
> >> 160mb RAM). BTW it uses about 35mb.
> >> max
>
> > Thanks for your reply.
> > Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only
> > uses about 250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version
> > seemed to. At least that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task
> > Manager.
>
> I just installed the newest version-very small footprint as opposed
> to the earlier version-good job Nick!
> max
>

You never had a problem removing SAS from your computer?

Took all kind of tools for me to get rid of it. (the last free
version -whatever that was).