What's in a Name? wrote:
> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> this jewel in news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> Does anyone here use it?
>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>>
> If you select "start with windows", the free version will auto-update
> itself. I do not have that option checked because of limited RAM on
> the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop, 160mb RAM). BTW it uses
> about 35mb.
> max

Thanks for your reply.
Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only uses about
250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version seemed to. At least
that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task Manager.