SuperAntiSpyware

[Buffalo]

Does anyone here use it?
I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much faster in scan
time, than before, which was slower than many others.
The free version works like the paid version with the exception of automatic
updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as removing the
adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.

[What's in a Name?]

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
this jewel in news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com:

> Does anyone here use it?
> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>
If you select "start with windows", the free version will auto-update
itself. I do not have that option checked because of limited RAM on
the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop, 160mb RAM). BTW it uses
about 35mb.
max
--
Virus Removal http://max.shplink.com/removal.html
Keep Clean http://max.shplink.com/keepingclean.html
Tools http://max.shplink.com/tools.html
Change nomail.afraid.org to gmail.com to reply by email.
I was lost,but now I'm blind.

[VanguardLH]

"Buffalo" wrote in message
news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Does anyone here use it?
> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much faster
> in scan
> time, than before, which was slower than many others.
> The free version works like the paid version with the exception of
> automatic
> updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as removing
> the
> adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.


You bought it and *now* you want opinions on it? Uh huh. Looks like
a lame stab at hiding spam in a question.

[giedrius.majauskas@gmail.com]

I am happy with free version.
IMHO its one of the best free anti-spyware with a remover, at least
for me.

[Buffalo]

VanguardLH wrote:
> "Buffalo" wrote in message
> news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>> Does anyone here use it?
>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much faster
>> in scan
>> time, than before, which was slower than many others.
>> The free version works like the paid version with the exception of
>> automatic
>> updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as removing
>> the
>> adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>
>
> You bought it and *now* you want opinions on it? Uh huh. Looks like
> a lame stab at hiding spam in a question.

Not at all. I am just looking for other's opinions. I also use
SpyWareBlaster.
When I used the free version of SAS, it found a couple of items (not just
cookies) and fixed the problem.
I figured it was worth paying the owner for.

[Buffalo]

What's in a Name? wrote:
> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> this jewel in news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> Does anyone here use it?
>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>>
> If you select "start with windows", the free version will auto-update
> itself. I do not have that option checked because of limited RAM on
> the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop, 160mb RAM). BTW it uses
> about 35mb.
> max

Thanks for your reply.
Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only uses about
250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version seemed to. At least
that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task Manager.

[What's in a Name?]

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
this jewel in newsoKdnaqDs4bUlnzanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@comcast.com:

> What's in a Name? wrote:
>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
>> this jewel in news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>
>>> Does anyone here use it?
>>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
>>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
>>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
>>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
>>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
>>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>>>
>> If you select "start with windows", the free version will
>> auto-update itself. I do not have that option checked because of
>> limited RAM on the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop,
>> 160mb RAM). BTW it uses about 35mb.
>> max
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only
> uses about 250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version
> seemed to. At least that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task
> Manager.
>
No I haven't tried the latest and greatest yet.
Sounds like it has gotten much better,I think I will go check it out.

max
--
Virus Removal http://max.shplink.com/removal.html
Keep Clean http://max.shplink.com/keepingclean.html
Tools http://max.shplink.com/tools.html
Change nomail.afraid.org to gmail.com to reply by email.
I was lost,but now I'm blind.

[What's in a Name?]

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
this jewel in newsoKdnaqDs4bUlnzanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@comcast.com:

> What's in a Name? wrote:
>> "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
>> this jewel in news:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>
>>> Does anyone here use it?
>>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
>>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
>>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
>>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
>>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
>>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>>>
>> If you select "start with windows", the free version will
>> auto-update itself. I do not have that option checked because of
>> limited RAM on the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop,
>> 160mb RAM). BTW it uses about 35mb.
>> max
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only
> uses about 250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version
> seemed to. At least that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task
> Manager.
>
I just installed the newest version-very small footprint as opposed
to the earlier version-good job Nick!
max
--
Virus Removal http://max.shplink.com/removal.html
Keep Clean http://max.shplink.com/keepingclean.html
Tools http://max.shplink.com/tools.html
Change nomail.afraid.org to gmail.com to reply by email.
I was lost,but now I'm blind.

[Ron]

On Mar 20, 1:13 pm, "What's in a Name?" <maxwach...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> this jewel innewsoKdnaqDs4bUlnzanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>
>
> > What's in a Name? wrote:
> >> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
> >> this jewel innews:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.co m:
>
> >>> Does anyone here use it?
> >>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
> >>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
> >>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
> >>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
> >>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
> >>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection, AFAIK.
> >>> The free version is on-demand only but just as powerful as
> >>> removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid version.
>
> >> If you select "start with windows", the free version will
> >> auto-update itself. I do not have that option checked because of
> >> limited RAM on the machine I am using (an old Compaq laptop,
> >> 160mb RAM). BTW it uses about 35mb.
> >> max
>
> > Thanks for your reply.
> > Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only
> > uses about 250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version
> > seemed to. At least that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task
> > Manager.
>
> I just installed the newest version-very small footprint as opposed
> to the earlier version-good job Nick!
> max
>

You never had a problem removing SAS from your computer?

Took all kind of tools for me to get rid of it. (the last free
version -whatever that was).

[What's in a Name?]

Ron <bigelile07@yahoo.com> after much thought,came up with this
jewel in
news:313d69b1-54aa-4bd4-b581-48fd145df0b3@z38g2000hsc.googlegroups.co
m:

> On Mar 20, 1:13 pm, "What's in a Name?"
> <maxwach...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up with
>> this jewel innewsoKdnaqDs4bUlnzanZ2dnUVZ_v-hnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>
>>
>>
>> > What's in a Name? wrote:
>> >> "Buffalo" <E...@nada.com.invalid> after much thought,came up
>> >> with this jewel
>> >> innews:IZadnW3dSpsP7X3anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.co m:
>>
>> >>> Does anyone here use it?
>> >>> I would like to hear the good and the bad about it.
>> >>> I use the paid version and I am happy with it.
>> >>> They just recently upgraded their program and now it is much
>> >>> faster in scan time, than before, which was slower than many
>> >>> others. The free version works like the paid version with the
>> >>> exception of automatic updating and real-time protection,
>> >>> AFAIK. The free version is on-demand only but just as
>> >>> powerful as removing the adware,spyware,etc as the paid
>> >>> version.
>>
>> >> If you select "start with windows", the free version will
>> >> auto-update itself. I do not have that option checked because
>> >> of limited RAM on the machine I am using (an old Compaq
>> >> laptop, 160mb RAM). BTW it uses about 35mb.
>> >> max
>>
>> > Thanks for your reply.
>> > Check to see if you have the latest version 4.0.1154 as it only
>> > uses about 250kb, way down from the 40MB that the older version
>> > seemed to. At least that is what it shows in my Win2000 Task
>> > Manager.
>>
>> I just installed the newest version-very small footprint as
>> opposed to the earlier version-good job Nick!
>> max
>>
>
> You never had a problem removing SAS from your computer?

Not that I recall

> Took all kind of tools for me to get rid of it. (the last free
> version -whatever that was).

The only removal tool I use is format. Since I use PortableApps for
almost everything these days, when I have installed and uninstalled
many programs to my hard drive, I just start over. Takes much less
time than trying a bunch of cleaning tools.
max
--
Virus Removal http://max.shplink.com/removal.html
Keep Clean http://max.shplink.com/keepingclean.html
Tools http://max.shplink.com/tools.html
Change nomail.afraid.org to gmail.com to reply by email.
I was lost,but now I'm blind.