"Duane" <NoSpam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HDBxj.14290$R84.13476@newssvr25.news.prodigy. net...
> While installing Spybot version 1.5.2 (just after installing AdAware
> 2007) I received a message from Spybot saying that it is incompatible
> with AdAware 2007.
>
> Is this true? Is there any way to have these 2 programs coexist?
>
> These are my favorite protection programs for non-virus malware.
> Since no one malware protection program seems to do-it-all, what are
> other users favorite combinations.
>
> My favorite "concoction" is; AdAware, Spybot, Spyware Blaster and
> sometimes SuperAntispyware. I've tried Spysweeper, MS Defender and
> Spyware Doctor, but they never found anything that the others couldn't
> find.
>
> Also, I use FireFox with Script blocking and common sense.
>
> - Duane
I used Ad-Aware Personal SE and Spybot for years and they never
had any incompatibility issues. When I installed AdAware 2007 I do
not remember having any problems with it and Spybot, but that was
awhile ago.
However, AdAware 2007 only lasted on my computer for about
a month and I got rid of it as I did not like it. I now use Spybot,
Spyware Blaster, Spyware Terminator and SuperAntispyware.
At this point, SuperAntispyware is my personal favorite as I have
been using it at work to clean up several PC's and it does a pretty
good job. On the last three PC's I used it on it found, and got rid
of, a total of a little over 900 spyware entries.
The biggest problem I had with AdAware 2007 was I could not
tell if it was updating. I would tell it to and sit there waiting to see
if anything happened. Eventually the update would complete, but
I hated the lack of a progress bar showing me the percentage of
completion.
Another thing I did not like was the previous version allowed you
to pick the directory, or directories, that you wanted to scan and
AdAware 2007 will not allow that in the free version. Sometimes
I just want to do a quick scan of the system32 folder, as that is
where allot of spyware files get stored, and it won't allow that.


Reply With Quote