that is how most un-enlightened so called "intelectual" debates wind up... spinning off into infinite lesser meaning of the original topic, not unlike what scientists call "quarks" Meandering in their spiral, perhaps the spiral of another dimention; time, where they become so far out of sync that we can no longer see where they are going, only to find out that they were only trying to understand where the other person was coming from. But since it's a "debate" which is like two magnets, polarized in opposition for the sake of the matter... They could never come to an agreement at end, so they bounced off into another subject, eventually one remembers their original "uhm" what I was saying is I don't like it, or I do like it... In the end all of what we now know about this debate is that nomatter what you have to say, you can't tell ME why I should or shouldn't like it. To no end shall I decide to "NOT" tell you why I do or do-not like IT.
Here's your sign?



Reply With Quote