The usual things on here are just tracking cookies but I know it works
because it found a few that Ad-Aware had missed <g>
As said I'm not that happy with Ad-Aware 2007 quite often when I go to
update, after it tells me it has caused a problem and needs to close <g> I
think in the near future I will take it off this system completely.
Joan

"Bob" <roburt@grande.net> wrote in message
news:13rmfg9n1e42d03@corp.supernews.com...
> Joan, I have SUPERAnitSpyware, and since I've had it, I have never had a
> hit on anything with it, and it's kept up to date. I'm beginning to
> wonder about it. Guess I should be happy that my computer is all that
> clean.
>
>
>
>
> "Joan Archer" <archer_joan@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:47bb30e4$0$26077$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
>> You could always give SUPERAntiSpyware a try.
>> I'm not overly fond of the new version of Ad-Aware either <g>
>> Joan
>>
>> "Al" <albertr@joimail.com> wrote in message
>> news:13rm71g9feko130@corp.supernews.com...
>>> I was using AdAware SE without any apparent problem, and suddenly I
>>> couldn't download updates. I uninstalled it and replaced it with the
>>> newer AdAware 2007.
>>> It doesn't seem to be as good. After using it for several weeks, I
>>> still haven't found any "Criticals". I just get cookies. It is harder
>>> to update definitions. And it is slower. When I try to update, it
>>> attempt to upsell me. The program seems less user friendly.
>>>
>>> Two questions:
>>> Is anyone else finding that AdAware 2007 doesn't get the "criticals?"
>>> Can anyone recommend a good alternative free anti-spyware/malware
>>> program?
>>> Al
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com