Bob Adkins wrote:
> http://www.spywareterminator.com/
>
> Haven't tried it yet. Don't know if it has nags to "upgrade" to the
> horrendous Web Security Guard and/or Crawler Metasearch abomination.
>
> I still use the older "light" version without all the baggage, and
> really like it.
> -
>
> Bob
these people have something to say on it:
They have delisted it as rogue, but reading what they say, i wouldnt trust
it.
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm
Gaz
From: "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com>
|
| these people have something to say on it:
|
| They have delisted it as rogue, but reading what they say, i wouldnt trust
| it.
| http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm
|
| Gaz
|
SpwareWarrior is now out-of-date. De-listed utilities such as XoftSpy should be put back on
the rogue list!
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
news:PLMsj.338$Cs.229@trnddc04:
> From: "Gaz" <gazter@msn.com>
>
>
>|
>| these people have something to say on it:
>|
>| They have delisted it as rogue, but reading what they say, i wouldnt
>| trust it.
>| http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm
>|
>| Gaz
>|
>
> SpwareWarrior is now out-of-date. De-listed utilities such as XoftSpy
> should be put back on the rogue list!
>
>
Dave, do you have a more updated rogue list comparison such as Spyware
Warrior? I'm going thru the collection of rogues BugHunter detects, and I
want to make sure I'm not still detecting things that shouldn't be
considered rogue, and vice versa.
--
Regards,
Dustin Cook - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
BugHunter v2.2e AntiMalware Removal Utility
From: "Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
| Dave, do you have a more updated rogue list comparison such as Spyware
| Warrior? I'm going thru the collection of rogues BugHunter detects, and I
| want to make sure I'm not still detecting things that shouldn't be
| considered rogue, and vice versa.
|
Dustin:
Contact made offline...
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
On Feb 13, 8:16 pm, "Gaz" <gaz...@msn.com> wrote:
> Bob Adkins wrote:
> >http://www.spywareterminator.com/
>
> > Haven't tried it yet. Don't know if it has nags to "upgrade" to the
> > horrendous Web Security Guard and/or Crawler Metasearch abomination.
>
> > I still use the older "light" version without all the baggage, and
> > really like it.
> > -
>
> > Bob
>
> these people have something to say on it:
>
> They have delisted it as rogue, but reading what they say, i wouldnt trust
> it.http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm
>
> Gaz
Used it for years....nothing wrong with it.
SWT is (IMO) the best free antispyware program out there and Gizmo,
agrees.
http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...tilities.htm#3
I'm using Spy Sweeper, but just for the hell of it, I downloaded the
latest version of SWT, and it's faster than it's ever been.
Bob Adkins wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:22:14 -0800 (PST), "use_a_hammer@yahoo.com"
> <use_a_hammer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Used it for years....nothing wrong with it.
>>
>> SWT is (IMO) the best free antispyware program out there and Gizmo,
>> agrees.
>>
>> http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...tilities.htm#3
>>
>> I'm using Spy Sweeper, but just for the hell of it, I downloaded the
>> latest version of SWT, and it's faster than it's ever been.
>
> I agree... up until now.
>
> The author is now force feeding you "Web Security Guard" and "Crawler
> Metasearch". If you don't buy the software, it keeps warning you that
> the above are not installed.
> -
>
> Bob
I have yet to find a better anti spyware then superantispyware, avg
antispyware is prettty good, but misses a few things that superantispyware
gets.
Gaz
On Feb 20, 3:38 pm, "Gaz" <gaz...@msn.com> wrote:
> Bob Adkins wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:22:14 -0800 (PST), "use_a_ham...@yahoo.com"
> > <use_a_ham...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Used it for years....nothing wrong with it.
>
> >> SWT is (IMO) the best free antispyware program out there and Gizmo,
> >> agrees.
>
> >>http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...tilities.htm#3
>
> >> I'm using Spy Sweeper, but just for the hell of it, I downloaded the
> >> latest version of SWT, and it's faster than it's ever been.
>
> > I agree... up until now.
>
> > The author is now force feeding you "Web Security Guard" and "Crawler
> > Metasearch". If you don't buy the software, it keeps warning you that
> > the above are not installed.
> > -
>
> > Bob
>
> I have yet to find a better anti spyware then superantispyware, avg
> antispyware is prettty good, but misses a few things that superantispyware
> gets.
>
> Gaz
They all find different things.
use_a_hammer@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 20, 3:38 pm, "Gaz" <gaz...@msn.com> wrote:
>> Bob Adkins wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:22:14 -0800 (PST), "use_a_ham...@yahoo.com"
>>> <use_a_ham...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Used it for years....nothing wrong with it.
>>
>>>> SWT is (IMO) the best free antispyware program out there and Gizmo,
>>>> agrees.
>>
>>>> http://www.techsupportalert.com/best...tilities.htm#3
>>
>>>> I'm using Spy Sweeper, but just for the hell of it, I downloaded
>>>> the latest version of SWT, and it's faster than it's ever been.
>>
>>> I agree... up until now.
>>
>>> The author is now force feeding you "Web Security Guard" and
>>> "Crawler Metasearch". If you don't buy the software, it keeps
>>> warning you that the above are not installed.
>>> -
>>
>>> Bob
>>
>> I have yet to find a better anti spyware then superantispyware, avg
>> antispyware is prettty good, but misses a few things that
>> superantispyware gets.
>>
>> Gaz
>
> They all find different things.
And all, but about a dozen, make things up to get you to buy them.
Gaz
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote