Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: Re: Firewall Software Recommendations?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    M.L. Guest

    Re: Firewall Software Recommendations?

    >> I don't know much about it, but I've read that a hardware firewall
    >> is supposed to provide more security, at an added cost.


    > Hardware based FireWall appliances are far better then software
    > FireWalls and don't hog resources.
    >
    > Even a NAT Router with simplistic FireWall constructs is preferred.


    Outbound protection only though.

    > Such devices can also be monitored with software such as WallWatcher.
    > http://www.wallwatcher.com/


  2. #2
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Firewall Software Recommendations?

    From: "M.L." <me@privacy.invalid>

    >>> I don't know much about it, but I've read that a hardware firewall
    >>> is supposed to provide more security, at an added cost.

    |
    >> Hardware based FireWall appliances are far better then software
    >> FireWalls and don't hog resources.
    >>
    >> Even a NAT Router with simplistic FireWall constructs is preferred.

    |
    | Outbound protection only though.
    |

    Not true at all !

    --
    Dave
    http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
    Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  3. #3
    Leythos Guest

    Re: Firewall Software Recommendations?

    In article <wA7sj.6869$R84.5236@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net> ,
    me@privacy.invalid says...
    > >> I don't know much about it, but I've read that a hardware firewall
    > >> is supposed to provide more security, at an added cost.

    >
    > > Hardware based FireWall appliances are far better then software
    > > FireWalls and don't hog resources.
    > >
    > > Even a NAT Router with simplistic FireWall constructs is preferred.

    >
    > Outbound protection only though.


    Actually, even the simple NAT appliances provide INBOUND protection from
    unsolicited traffic/scanning. As a matter of fact, in a 1:MANY NAT,
    which is how those cheap appliances are setup, unless you poke a hole in
    it, and the default is no holes mapped, you won't get any Unsolicited
    traffic inside the LAN.

    Additionally, most of the cheap NAT routers offer a way to make ports
    LOCAL, that can't leave your LAN - and I always make ports 135-139, 445,
    1433-1434 local ports.

    When you combine the cheap NAT routers with monitoring software like
    wallwatcher you have an effective means to monitor in/out traffic from
    your NAT appliance.

    --

    Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

    Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
    that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
    look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
    http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
    to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
    You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
    'exposed to kids'.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •