On Jan 18, 1:53 pm, Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> cbgerry <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net> wrote innews:ed2a4eca-a52f-4d72-9e5c-0d60758abb86@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 12:14 am, Dustin Cook <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/NEWSIG.TXT
>
> >> --
> >> Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2e
> >> Email.: bughunter.dus...@gmail.com
> >> Web...:http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
> >> Pad...:http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
> >> PGP...:http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt
>
> > Hey Mr. Cook.... don't know if you remember me ? Probably not and I
> > don't know how I got on this mailing list, but that's okay - I think
> > I'll stay. We did have some back to back emails awhile back and I
> > think you had the wrong impression of me. Number one - I have a Data
> > Processor Certificate 1970. Number two I have "discovery" in the
> > signature based heuristics commercial software removers as the malware
> > RASautodial entrants. NONE have I ever seen remove those and having
> > Programmers in my family including and an retired Air Force agent -
> > well they declined to set up a distributable removal utility and I
> > passed them onto the companies. My comment was I believe you thought I
> > was just an average user.
>
> Hi Gerald, Yes I remember you.
>
> > But.... here is a question I hope if you have the time you could
> > possibly make some comments on as I am well aware of your software
> > authorship product. Do you find the comments at this web as basically
> > true - meaning using the DOS to do what is said ? (create undetectable
> > malware - I know, ILLEGAL - but is a proof of concept in context
> > writing with the warnings posted).
>
> > Web:
> >http://hacksafe.com.au/blog/2007/01/...w-undetectable
> > -virus-in-3-easy-steps/
>
> Well, sadly, it's that easy yes to modify and/or create something that
> won't be scanned, atleast not for the time being. It's an old war.
> Antivirus/antimalware is always going to be retroactive in nature; It's
> just not possible for us to determine good software from bad at an
> automatic level that would do any good.
>
> > I am on Google Groups and really do not want a bunch of vulnerable
> > open source reader software on my 'puter - so forgive the format post
> > or recommend a free reader and thank you very, very much for your time
> > if you have it to spare.
>
> I'm a fan of Xnews myself; it's based on the old win3.x program
> NewsXpress.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dustin Cook / Raid

Thank you very much for a qualified answer. I appreciate the time and
response.