TheApostle wrote:
> This post, Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2757CA69F5HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>
>> TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in
>> news:MPG.21f75d32fba3c24298973d@news.sharkpost.org :
>>
>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
>>> Message-ID:<<5v5hm5F1kaj69U1@mid.individual.net>>
>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>>
>>>> See "Kook of the Year" candidate #19.
>>>
>>> Goodness, a Dustin's been Nominated for Kook of the Year.
>>>
>>> Let me know how it turns out. Wear the Badge with Honour!
>>
>> OH yes, I forgot about Rhonda... Lemme see.
>
> Rhonda hasn't said anything to me, therefore I wont say about it.
> Alas with all them, they can't help from opening their mouths and
> I do enjoy shutting them up. <WEFG>
>
>> not much really to say that hasn't already been said.
>
> I'm wagering that they believe that the AuK awards have merit?

It depends on what you mean by "merit." See below.

But wouldn't you agree that even a stopped clock is right twice a day?

That would be auk's choice of Dustin.

> I wouldn't fret too much about the nomination, considering the
> people who are nominating you.

I voted for him (before I was disenfranchised) because he posted my
name, address and telephone number to alt. sex. He invited
people--anyone at all--to come to my home.

> I was nominated and never made the list (I was disappointed).

I have Golden Killfile and Ministry of Circle Jerks, /and/ I'm in the
Galactic Killfile.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Miller's Law: In order to understand what another
person is saying, you must assume that it is true
and try to imagine what it could be true of.