Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> John "C" wrote:
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:5v6mn3F1l5935U1@mid.individual.net...
> >> 4Q wrote:
> >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> >>>> TheApostle wrote:
> >>>>> This post, Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2757CA69F5HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>>
> >>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in
> >>>>>> news:MPG.21f75d32fba3c24298973d@news.sharkpost.org :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> Message-ID:<<5v5hm5F1kaj69U1@mid.individual.net>>
> >>>>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> See "Kook of the Year" candidate #19.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Goodness, a Dustin's been Nominated for Kook of the Year.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let me know how it turns out. Wear the Badge with Honour!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> OH yes, I forgot about Rhonda... Lemme see.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rhonda hasn't said anything to me, therefore I wont say about it.
> >>>>> Alas with all them, they can't help from opening their mouths and
> >>>>> I do enjoy shutting them up. <WEFG>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> not much really to say that hasn't already been said.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm wagering that they believe that the AuK awards have merit?
> >>>>
> >>>> It depends on what you mean by "merit." See below.
> >>>>
> >>>> But wouldn't you agree that even a stopped clock is right twice a
> >>>> day?
> >>>>
> >>>> That would be auk's choice of Dustin.
> >>>>
> >>>>> I wouldn't fret too much about the nomination, considering the
> >>>>> people who are nominating you.
> >>>>
> >>>> I voted for him (before I was disenfranchised) because he posted my
> >>>> name, address and telephone number to alt. sex. He invited
> >>>> people--anyone at all--to come to my home.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Careful there Rhonda, do a bit of
> >>> background reading on Dustbin's new
> >>> friend... kOOk's of a feather flock together. ;]]
> >>
> >> As I said, even a stopped clock can be right twice a day.
> >>
> >> Dustin has a personality disorder and that makes him dangerous to
> >> anyone who trusts him.
> >>
> >>>>> I was nominated and never made the list (I was disappointed).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> CotM potential candidate.
> >>>
> >>>> I have Golden Killfile and Ministry of Circle Jerks, /and/ I'm in
> >>>> the Galactic Killfile.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> *heh* I think your history could be
> >>> re-written if you weren't Kadaitcha Mans
> >>> Ex-wife. If you hadn't fallen in
> >>> love with his pickled willy you might
> >>> have been AUK untouched.
> >>
> >> Actually, the real reasons I won the awards is that I agreed with
> >> Mike Cranston's position when he went head-to-head with the FNVW's
> >> main squeeze over the idea that if it's not okay for a kook to do
> >> something, it's not okay for a kookologist to do the same thing.
> >> Also, at nearly the same time, I went head-to-head with Lionel Lauer
Was Lionel the one dressed up in ladies
underwear?
4Q
=====================
> >> over his poking of a Formosa'd kook. There was another, similar
> >> incident that I can't remember right now, as well as some related
> >> fallout, but those two incidents were the impetus for what followed.
> >>
> >> My reaction to Rick's accusation that I'm an "emotional abuser" just
> >> gave them the leverage to take me on on an emotional rather than
> >> logical level. I should have realized when I gave him a book on
> >> abusive behavior to read, it was like lighting the fuse on a loaded
> >> cannon, but at the time, I was in love, and I didn't understand what
> >> I was dealing with. Silly me.
> >>
> >> The fact that I was also extremely ill made it easy for certain
> >> aukers to use me as a chew toy.
> >
> > It appears that you got the "last laugh" since Lional and Rick no
> > longer post here, or anywhere that I've seen.
>
> Truly, John, I don't think there will ever be anything at all about that
> episode to inspire me to laugh.
>
> Well...the awards, maybe. They kinda tickle me.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
> nimue@databasix.com
>
> Miller's Law: In order to understand what another
> person is saying, you must assume that it is true
> and try to imagine what it could be true of.



Reply With Quote