Ping 4Q

[4Q]

gregvk wrote:
> TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in

<snip> what useless Les said

>
> Welcome to the Esteemed KF Club. Now you can post awful things about her
> and she'll never know.

Greg, I feel for you man it must be
lonely in everybodys KF, at least you
still have your Grandmother to think
about.


;]]

[4Q]

TheApostle wrote:
> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>

> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie. <snickers>

That's because you are Leslie dumbass.
And Leslie is a nice sounding ghay name,
it suits you.

http://fourq.host.sk/img/Les_TheApauling.jpg

;]]

[Sugien]

"gregvk" <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote in message
news:Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2...
> "Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:47954e64$0$10932$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>
>>
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5vkirhF1mq76pU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> TheApostle wrote:
>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
>>>> Message-ID:<<5vkfg6F1n23ikU1@mid.individual.net>>
>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>>>
>>>>> TheApostle wrote:
>>>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Message-ID:<<5vjhgnF1n2b6iU1@mid.individual.net>>
>>>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stop crying you idiot. You made a
>>>>>>>> complete twat of yourself. You lied,
>>>>>>>> you cheated and you got kicked in the
>>>>>>>> ass every step of the way. Tell Les
>>>>>>>> why I decided to do the Google grepping
>>>>>>>> in the first place... *cuts to the chase*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BECAUSE you are a worm wriggling ****er
>>>>>>>> and you need nailing down, so people can
>>>>>>>> see all your tricks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://fourq.host.sk/img/sooogeworm.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ;]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find it interesting that he is criticising you for reposting
>>>>>>> information he himself posted but he had nothing to say about
>>>>>>> Dustin posting information that was given to him privately with
>>>>>>> the expectation that it would remain private--information that
>>>>>>> had never been posted to usenet and was not available on the
>>>>>>> internet at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pardon me for interjecting at this point, Rhonda, but do you also
>>>>>> find it interesting that Pauls hypocrisy is only matched by his
>>>>>> habitual need for lying? Surely you have something to say about
>>>>>> him doing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've already commented on Dustins posting of information and as
>>>>>> such I said it would be hypocritical of me to condem him. While
>>>>>> I don't agree with it - how it is any different then what Paul is
>>>>>> doing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As everyone knows the knife cuts both ways whether they are our
>>>>>> friends or not. There is no excuse for any of us to be doing it
>>>>>> and to excuse your friend of doing and attacking another for doing
>>>>>> it is pure hypocrisy and a double-standards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Surely as a reasonable person you would have to agree. You aren't
>>>>>> really going to show favoritism just because Paul is your friend
>>>>>> are you?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the difference between reposting information that Sugien
>>>>> himself posted about himself and posting information that was
>>>>> divulged to Dustin in email but not publicly available anywhere
>>>>> else?
>>>>
>>>> Availibility makes no difference.
>>>
>>> We disagree.
>>>
>>> Apparently 4Q reposted some of Sugien's own posts which are archived
>>> in Google.
>>>
>>>>> None? Is that the case you're trying to make?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> You said that "availability makes no difference," so you're
>>> contradicting yourself when you say no.
>>>
>>> I don't care. I think that posting real life information is ****ful,
>>> and I don't think there's any excuse for it. I just think it's weird
>>> that everyone wants to come down hard on 4Q for reposting Sugien's
>>> own posts of his address, but no one wants to take Dustin to task for
>>> posting my information to alt.sex (with a clear invitation to the
>>> world to stop by for sex).
>>>
>>> To Sugien, I would say this: you have the ability to nuke your own
>>> posts in Google. Perhaps you should avail yourself of the
>>> opportunity.
>>>
>> I have asked them to remove the posts with my RL info; but they
>> haven't. I did get them to remove a copyrighted poem of mine; but not
>> the posts where my RL info was part of my sigline.
>
> If you switch news providers, post under a different name and e-mail
> address, and never post any personal data again, then it doesn't matter

It really doesn't matter anyway; because in RL I am quite secure in my
ability to take care of me and mine. Besides who knows maybe they have all
been taken in by quite an elaborate SE that is not only multi-layered; but
also has taken years to come to its own and be at full strength SE.
But then again maybe it is my RL info, I guess the only way for anyone
to know for sure would be to go to the address and see who comes to the door
and if *they* know anything about Usenet or if I just *borrowed* some poor
joe smoe's info to use as my own. Or same same with a relatives info.

> very much because your old posts will never be associated with your
> current posting identity. If you flame/annoy people they may decide to
> go on a sockpuppet hunt (i.e., search for other names you posted under)
> to find things to harass you with, but such endeavors will be fruitless
> if you are careful.

Naw, not worth the trouble
>
> Another idea you might want to think about is purposely posting false
> personal data about yourself, such as a fake address and phone number.

Hmmm, maybe I already did, roflmao

> Make them totally fake, but make them seem as real as possible. Just be
> careful not to accidentally post some stranger's real number or address.
> The idea is twofold: (a) Give potential stalkers bull**** info to waste
> their time on so they will spend less time looking for your real info.
> (b) Introduce doubt as to the validity of previously posted personal
> info.

You know that they have had phone forwarding for quite some time even way
back in 1998, and when I was called by a a-hole from ACV, maybe that number
was forwarded to my *real* number; but maybe not, lol. Who knows that web
cam I had up could have been to someone other then me and maybe I am living
in the shadows using them as a front; but most likely it is my RL info and
who knows maybe I interdispursed real info about me with SE info, maybe I
was not in Nam but ran off to Canada, or maybe I was a combat vet; but would
rather be thought to be a rear area guy because I don't want anyone to know;
but then again, there is nothing wrong with being a clerk in a war zone;
because for every guy on the line it takes 10 to support them and in a war
zone, especially Nam the local right beside you can work with you in the day
and blow you up with a IED that night. A war zone does give your A-Hole
pucker power, lol
--
From the Desk of Sugien CSK
/}
@###{ ]::::::Cyber Striker Knight::::::>
\}

[Sugien]

"TheApostle" <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.21ff24436e1a0298989796@news.sharkpost.org ...
> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC928439FBA5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |
> |TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in
> |news:MPG.21ff21d8d5e20051989794@news.sharkpost.or g:
> |
> |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> |> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |>|
> |>|"Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> |>|news:47954e64$0$10932$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> |>|
> |>|>
> |>|> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> |>|> news:5vkirhF1mq76pU1@mid.individual.net...
> |>|>> TheApostle wrote:
> |>|>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> |>|>>> Message-ID:<<5vkfg6F1n23ikU1@mid.individual.net>>
> |>|>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |>|>>>>
> |>|>>>> TheApostle wrote:
> |>|>>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> |>|>>>>> Message-ID:<<5vjhgnF1n2b6iU1@mid.individual.net>>
> |>|>>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |>|>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>> Stop crying you idiot. You made a
> |>|>>>>>>> complete twat of yourself. You lied,
> |>|>>>>>>> you cheated and you got kicked in the
> |>|>>>>>>> ass every step of the way. Tell Les
> |>|>>>>>>> why I decided to do the Google grepping
> |>|>>>>>>> in the first place... *cuts to the chase*
> |>|>>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>> BECAUSE you are a worm wriggling ****er
> |>|>>>>>>> and you need nailing down, so people can
> |>|>>>>>>> see all your tricks.
> |>|>>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>> http://fourq.host.sk/img/sooogeworm.jpg
> |>|>>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>>> ;]]
> |>|>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>> I find it interesting that he is criticising you for reposting
> |>|>>>>>> information he himself posted but he had nothing to say about
> |>|>>>>>> Dustin posting information that was given to him privately with
> |>|>>>>>> the expectation that it would remain private--information that
> |>|>>>>>> had never been posted to usenet and was not available on the
> |>|>>>>>> internet at all.
> |>|>>>>>>
> |>|>>>>>> Interesting.
> |>|>>>>>
> |>|>>>>> Pardon me for interjecting at this point, Rhonda, but do you
> |>|>>>>> also find it interesting that Pauls hypocrisy is only matched by
> |>|>>>>> his habitual need for lying? Surely you have something to say
> |>|>>>>> about him doing it.
> |>|>>>>>
> |>|>>>>> I've already commented on Dustins posting of information and as
> |>|>>>>> such I said it would be hypocritical of me to condem him. While
> |>|>>>>> I don't agree with it - how it is any different then what Paul
> |>|>>>>> is doing?
> |>|>>>>>
> |>|>>>>> As everyone knows the knife cuts both ways whether they are our
> |>|>>>>> friends or not. There is no excuse for any of us to be doing it
> |>|>>>>> and to excuse your friend of doing and attacking another for
> |>|>>>>> doing it is pure hypocrisy and a double-standards.
> |>|>>>>>
> |>|>>>>> Surely as a reasonable person you would have to agree. You
> |>|>>>>> aren't really going to show favoritism just because Paul is your
> |>|>>>>> friend are you?
> |>|>>>>
> |>|>>>> What's the difference between reposting information that Sugien
> |>|>>>> himself posted about himself and posting information that was
> |>|>>>> divulged to Dustin in email but not publicly available anywhere
> |>|>>>> else?
> |>|>>>
> |>|>>> Availibility makes no difference.
> |>|>>
> |>|>> We disagree.
> |>|>>
> |>|>> Apparently 4Q reposted some of Sugien's own posts which are
> |>|>> archived in Google.
> |>|>>
> |>|>>>> None? Is that the case you're trying to make?
> |>|>>>
> |>|>>> No.
> |>|>>
> |>|>> You said that "availability makes no difference," so you're
> |>|>> contradicting yourself when you say no.
> |>|>>
> |>|>> I don't care. I think that posting real life information is
> |>|>> ****ful, and I don't think there's any excuse for it. I just think
> |>|>> it's weird that everyone wants to come down hard on 4Q for
> |>|>> reposting Sugien's own posts of his address, but no one wants to
> |>|>> take Dustin to task for posting my information to alt.sex (with a
> |>|>> clear invitation to the world to stop by for sex).
> |>|>>
> |>|>> To Sugien, I would say this: you have the ability to nuke your own
> |>|>> posts in Google. Perhaps you should avail yourself of the
> |>|>> opportunity.
> |>|>>
> |>|> I have asked them to remove the posts with my RL info; but they
> |>|> haven't. I did get them to remove a copyrighted poem of mine; but
> |>|> not the posts where my RL info was part of my sigline.
> |>|
> |>|If you switch news providers, post under a different name and e-mail
> |>|address, and never post any personal data again, then it doesn't
> |>|matter very much because your old posts will never be associated with
> |>|your current posting identity. If you flame/annoy people they may
> |>|decide to go on a sockpuppet hunt (i.e., search for other names you
> |>|posted under) to find things to harass you with, but such endeavors
> |>|will be fruitless if you are careful.
> |>
> |> Good idea - it's easier to start over than remove adn Usenet providers
> |> are pretty cheap these days and even ...erm.. well Paul can't afford a
> |> real NSP. ROFL!
> |>
> |>|Another idea you might want to think about is purposely posting false
> |>|personal data about yourself, such as a fake address and phone number.
> |>| Make them totally fake, but make them seem as real as possible. Just
> |>|be careful not to accidentally post some stranger's real number or
> |>|address. The idea is twofold: (a) Give potential stalkers bull****
> |>|info to waste their time on so they will spend less time looking for
> |>|your real info. (b) Introduce doubt as to the validity of previously
> |>|posted personal info.
> |>
> |> A little too late to suggest this..it's the one I used many many moons
> |> ago when I first witnessed Whiterabbit harrassing Zulu in alt.cracks
> |> and believe me, if you do this right it can work out to your advantage
> |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie.
> |> <snickers>
> |
> |Do you have a fake address and phone number, too?
> |
> |I guess I could go Google that name, and find out for myself... But that
> |sounds like too much work.
> |
> |/lazy
>
> I even posted a resume... <laughs out loud> It's perfection!
> --
Ole Q must be waiting for me to send him my archived pages from his site;
because he only has a blank page up in my honor, lol

http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dimbulb/

[4Q]

Sugien wrote:
> "TheApostle" <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21ff24436e1a0298989796@news.sharkpost.org ...
> > This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> > Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC928439FBA5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> > may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |
> > |TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in
> > |news:MPG.21ff21d8d5e20051989794@news.sharkpost.or g:
> > |
> > |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> > |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> > |> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|
> > |>|"Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> > |>|news:47954e64$0$10932$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> > |>|
> > |>|>
> > |>|> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > |>|> news:5vkirhF1mq76pU1@mid.individual.net...
> > |>|>> TheApostle wrote:
> > |>|>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> > |>|>>> Message-ID:<<5vkfg6F1n23ikU1@mid.individual.net>>
> > |>|>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|>>>>
> > |>|>>>> TheApostle wrote:
> > |>|>>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> > |>|>>>>> Message-ID:<<5vjhgnF1n2b6iU1@mid.individual.net>>
> > |>|>>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> Stop crying you idiot. You made a
> > |>|>>>>>>> complete twat of yourself. You lied,
> > |>|>>>>>>> you cheated and you got kicked in the
> > |>|>>>>>>> ass every step of the way. Tell Les
> > |>|>>>>>>> why I decided to do the Google grepping
> > |>|>>>>>>> in the first place... *cuts to the chase*
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> BECAUSE you are a worm wriggling ****er
> > |>|>>>>>>> and you need nailing down, so people can
> > |>|>>>>>>> see all your tricks.
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> http://fourq.host.sk/img/sooogeworm.jpg
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> ;]]
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>> I find it interesting that he is criticising you for reposting
> > |>|>>>>>> information he himself posted but he had nothing to say about
> > |>|>>>>>> Dustin posting information that was given to him privately with
> > |>|>>>>>> the expectation that it would remain private--information that
> > |>|>>>>>> had never been posted to usenet and was not available on the
> > |>|>>>>>> internet at all.
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>> Interesting.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> Pardon me for interjecting at this point, Rhonda, but do you
> > |>|>>>>> also find it interesting that Pauls hypocrisy is only matched by
> > |>|>>>>> his habitual need for lying? Surely you have something to say
> > |>|>>>>> about him doing it.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> I've already commented on Dustins posting of information and as
> > |>|>>>>> such I said it would be hypocritical of me to condem him. While
> > |>|>>>>> I don't agree with it - how it is any different then what Paul
> > |>|>>>>> is doing?
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> As everyone knows the knife cuts both ways whether they are our
> > |>|>>>>> friends or not. There is no excuse for any of us to be doing it
> > |>|>>>>> and to excuse your friend of doing and attacking another for
> > |>|>>>>> doing it is pure hypocrisy and a double-standards.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> Surely as a reasonable person you would have to agree. You
> > |>|>>>>> aren't really going to show favoritism just because Paul is your
> > |>|>>>>> friend are you?
> > |>|>>>>
> > |>|>>>> What's the difference between reposting information that Sugien
> > |>|>>>> himself posted about himself and posting information that was
> > |>|>>>> divulged to Dustin in email but not publicly available anywhere
> > |>|>>>> else?
> > |>|>>>
> > |>|>>> Availibility makes no difference.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> We disagree.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> Apparently 4Q reposted some of Sugien's own posts which are
> > |>|>> archived in Google.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>>>> None? Is that the case you're trying to make?
> > |>|>>>
> > |>|>>> No.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> You said that "availability makes no difference," so you're
> > |>|>> contradicting yourself when you say no.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> I don't care. I think that posting real life information is
> > |>|>> ****ful, and I don't think there's any excuse for it. I just think
> > |>|>> it's weird that everyone wants to come down hard on 4Q for
> > |>|>> reposting Sugien's own posts of his address, but no one wants to
> > |>|>> take Dustin to task for posting my information to alt.sex (with a
> > |>|>> clear invitation to the world to stop by for sex).
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> To Sugien, I would say this: you have the ability to nuke your own
> > |>|>> posts in Google. Perhaps you should avail yourself of the
> > |>|>> opportunity.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|> I have asked them to remove the posts with my RL info; but they
> > |>|> haven't. I did get them to remove a copyrighted poem of mine; but
> > |>|> not the posts where my RL info was part of my sigline.
> > |>|
> > |>|If you switch news providers, post under a different name and e-mail
> > |>|address, and never post any personal data again, then it doesn't
> > |>|matter very much because your old posts will never be associated with
> > |>|your current posting identity. If you flame/annoy people they may
> > |>|decide to go on a sockpuppet hunt (i.e., search for other names you
> > |>|posted under) to find things to harass you with, but such endeavors
> > |>|will be fruitless if you are careful.
> > |>
> > |> Good idea - it's easier to start over than remove adn Usenet providers
> > |> are pretty cheap these days and even ...erm.. well Paul can't afford a
> > |> real NSP. ROFL!
> > |>
> > |>|Another idea you might want to think about is purposely posting false
> > |>|personal data about yourself, such as a fake address and phone number.
> > |>| Make them totally fake, but make them seem as real as possible. Just
> > |>|be careful not to accidentally post some stranger's real number or
> > |>|address. The idea is twofold: (a) Give potential stalkers bull****
> > |>|info to waste their time on so they will spend less time looking for
> > |>|your real info. (b) Introduce doubt as to the validity of previously
> > |>|posted personal info.
> > |>
> > |> A little too late to suggest this..it's the one I used many many moons
> > |> ago when I first witnessed Whiterabbit harrassing Zulu in alt.cracks
> > |> and believe me, if you do this right it can work out to your advantage
> > |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie.
> > |> <snickers>
> > |
> > |Do you have a fake address and phone number, too?
> > |
> > |I guess I could go Google that name, and find out for myself... But that
> > |sounds like too much work.
> > |
> > |/lazy
> >
> > I even posted a resume... <laughs out loud> It's perfection!
> > --
> Ole Q must be waiting for me to send him my archived pages from his site;
> because he only has a blank page up in my honor, lol
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dimbulb/


It's blank like your mind Dimbulb.


CaptnNiceGuy:
Don't worry dad ive been prayin for you

DadDimbulb:
Thx son I am a little ank shus

CaptnNiceGuy:
RETARD! Itz speldit anxioushus


;]]

[4Q]

Sugien wrote:
> "TheApostle" <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21ff24436e1a0298989796@news.sharkpost.org ...
> > This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> > Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC928439FBA5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> > may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |
> > |TheApostle <likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote in
> > |news:MPG.21ff21d8d5e20051989794@news.sharkpost.or g:
> > |
> > |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> > |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> > |> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|
> > |>|"Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> > |>|news:47954e64$0$10932$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> > |>|
> > |>|>
> > |>|> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > |>|> news:5vkirhF1mq76pU1@mid.individual.net...
> > |>|>> TheApostle wrote:
> > |>|>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> > |>|>>> Message-ID:<<5vkfg6F1n23ikU1@mid.individual.net>>
> > |>|>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|>>>>
> > |>|>>>> TheApostle wrote:
> > |>|>>>>> This post, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com>
> > |>|>>>>> Message-ID:<<5vjhgnF1n2b6iU1@mid.individual.net>>
> > |>|>>>>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> Stop crying you idiot. You made a
> > |>|>>>>>>> complete twat of yourself. You lied,
> > |>|>>>>>>> you cheated and you got kicked in the
> > |>|>>>>>>> ass every step of the way. Tell Les
> > |>|>>>>>>> why I decided to do the Google grepping
> > |>|>>>>>>> in the first place... *cuts to the chase*
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> BECAUSE you are a worm wriggling ****er
> > |>|>>>>>>> and you need nailing down, so people can
> > |>|>>>>>>> see all your tricks.
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> http://fourq.host.sk/img/sooogeworm.jpg
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>>> ;]]
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>> I find it interesting that he is criticising you for reposting
> > |>|>>>>>> information he himself posted but he had nothing to say about
> > |>|>>>>>> Dustin posting information that was given to him privately with
> > |>|>>>>>> the expectation that it would remain private--information that
> > |>|>>>>>> had never been posted to usenet and was not available on the
> > |>|>>>>>> internet at all.
> > |>|>>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>>> Interesting.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> Pardon me for interjecting at this point, Rhonda, but do you
> > |>|>>>>> also find it interesting that Pauls hypocrisy is only matched by
> > |>|>>>>> his habitual need for lying? Surely you have something to say
> > |>|>>>>> about him doing it.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> I've already commented on Dustins posting of information and as
> > |>|>>>>> such I said it would be hypocritical of me to condem him. While
> > |>|>>>>> I don't agree with it - how it is any different then what Paul
> > |>|>>>>> is doing?
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> As everyone knows the knife cuts both ways whether they are our
> > |>|>>>>> friends or not. There is no excuse for any of us to be doing it
> > |>|>>>>> and to excuse your friend of doing and attacking another for
> > |>|>>>>> doing it is pure hypocrisy and a double-standards.
> > |>|>>>>>
> > |>|>>>>> Surely as a reasonable person you would have to agree. You
> > |>|>>>>> aren't really going to show favoritism just because Paul is your
> > |>|>>>>> friend are you?
> > |>|>>>>
> > |>|>>>> What's the difference between reposting information that Sugien
> > |>|>>>> himself posted about himself and posting information that was
> > |>|>>>> divulged to Dustin in email but not publicly available anywhere
> > |>|>>>> else?
> > |>|>>>
> > |>|>>> Availibility makes no difference.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> We disagree.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> Apparently 4Q reposted some of Sugien's own posts which are
> > |>|>> archived in Google.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>>>> None? Is that the case you're trying to make?
> > |>|>>>
> > |>|>>> No.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> You said that "availability makes no difference," so you're
> > |>|>> contradicting yourself when you say no.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> I don't care. I think that posting real life information is
> > |>|>> ****ful, and I don't think there's any excuse for it. I just think
> > |>|>> it's weird that everyone wants to come down hard on 4Q for
> > |>|>> reposting Sugien's own posts of his address, but no one wants to
> > |>|>> take Dustin to task for posting my information to alt.sex (with a
> > |>|>> clear invitation to the world to stop by for sex).
> > |>|>>
> > |>|>> To Sugien, I would say this: you have the ability to nuke your own
> > |>|>> posts in Google. Perhaps you should avail yourself of the
> > |>|>> opportunity.
> > |>|>>
> > |>|> I have asked them to remove the posts with my RL info; but they
> > |>|> haven't. I did get them to remove a copyrighted poem of mine; but
> > |>|> not the posts where my RL info was part of my sigline.
> > |>|
> > |>|If you switch news providers, post under a different name and e-mail
> > |>|address, and never post any personal data again, then it doesn't
> > |>|matter very much because your old posts will never be associated with
> > |>|your current posting identity. If you flame/annoy people they may
> > |>|decide to go on a sockpuppet hunt (i.e., search for other names you
> > |>|posted under) to find things to harass you with, but such endeavors
> > |>|will be fruitless if you are careful.
> > |>
> > |> Good idea - it's easier to start over than remove adn Usenet providers
> > |> are pretty cheap these days and even ...erm.. well Paul can't afford a
> > |> real NSP. ROFL!
> > |>
> > |>|Another idea you might want to think about is purposely posting false
> > |>|personal data about yourself, such as a fake address and phone number.
> > |>| Make them totally fake, but make them seem as real as possible. Just
> > |>|be careful not to accidentally post some stranger's real number or
> > |>|address. The idea is twofold: (a) Give potential stalkers bull****
> > |>|info to waste their time on so they will spend less time looking for
> > |>|your real info. (b) Introduce doubt as to the validity of previously
> > |>|posted personal info.
> > |>
> > |> A little too late to suggest this..it's the one I used many many moons
> > |> ago when I first witnessed Whiterabbit harrassing Zulu in alt.cracks
> > |> and believe me, if you do this right it can work out to your advantage
> > |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie.
> > |> <snickers>
> > |
> > |Do you have a fake address and phone number, too?
> > |
> > |I guess I could go Google that name, and find out for myself... But that
> > |sounds like too much work.
> > |
> > |/lazy
> >
> > I even posted a resume... <laughs out loud> It's perfection!
> > --
> Ole Q must be waiting for me to send him my archived pages from his site;
> because he only has a blank page up in my honor, lol
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Dimbulb/


It's blank like your mind Dimbulb.


CaptnNiceGuy:
Don't worry dad ive been prayin for you

DadDimbulb:
Thx son I am a little ank shus

CaptnNiceGuy:
RETARD! Itz speldit anxioushus


;]]

[4Q]

TheApostle wrote:
> This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
> Message-ID:<<6612850c-660a-4f9c-88af-9753a06e22e7@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |
> |TheApostle wrote:
> |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> |
> |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie. <snickers>
> |
> |That's because you are Leslie dumbass.
>
> Sure it is sweetie, you just keep telling yourself that
> and maybe Running Rhonda will believe you ... <laffs>
>
> |And Leslie is a nice sounding ghay name, it suits you.
>
> You like ghey sounds eh, Pedo Paul!! <HAHAHAHAAH>

"Pedo Paul"? I've never been accused of
being a pedo before Leslie are you
going to back this libelous statement
up liar. Whereas a quick Google on your
posting is a history is full of
accusations of your pedo involvements.

>
> |http://fourq.host.sk/img/Les_TheApauling.jpg
>
> Such a hamdsome looking man.
>

You're a bit on the short side to be
considered a man, dwarf maybe. How
tall are you exactly Leslie, have you
got a few big cushions under your seat
to lift you upto the keyboard. Eyes
just peeking over the desktop, ey lil
fella?


;]]

[TheApostle]

This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
Message-ID:<<c70d22cc-c864-44db-bfc9-2315ed370346
@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
|
|TheApostle wrote:
|> This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
|> Message-ID:<<6612850c-660a-4f9c-88af-9753a06e22e7@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>>
|> may be monitored for quality assurance:
|> |
|> |TheApostle wrote:
|> |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
|> |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
|> |
|> |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie. <snickers>
|> |
|> |That's because you are Leslie dumbass.
|>
|> Sure it is sweetie, you just keep telling yourself that
|> and maybe Running Rhonda will believe you ... <laffs>
|>
|> |And Leslie is a nice sounding ghay name, it suits you.
|>
|> You like ghey sounds eh, Pedo Paul!! <HAHAHAHAAH>
|
|"Pedo Paul"?

Yuppers.

|I've never been accused of being a pedo before Leslie

Perhaps, no one has seen your admissions

....but don't worry - that can be fixed (BSEG)!

__________________________________________________ ____________________________

From: 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus,,,alt.usenet.kooks
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:20:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b5e88821-60ae-46e0-beaf-439f2c55cbcf@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Stop and think for a minute why the clown is behind "SharkPost". A tool for
uploading masses of files *alarm bells* to alt.binary.pictures Surely your
pedophile hunter friends must have done some research on ways the pedos
operate. Maybe you should get a few buddies to take a look, ey?

__________________________________________________ ____________________________

In this post you _admit_ that a Usenet posting tool named Sharkpost,
whom you ignorantly claim that I am behind creating, is uploading
masses of files, which you say raises *alarm bells* in reference to
binary pictures being posted in to alt.binary.pictures, by "pedos".

Watch how you get exposed, Pedophile Paul!

Are you paying attention?????

The _only_ way you would be able to know what program is being used in
that group, to upload those files you claim are raising *alarm bells*,
is if you are _downloading_ the headers, and thereby viewing the files
being posted by those "pedo" ppl in those groups.

Can you say BUSTED!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

|are you going to back this libelous statement up liar.

Me thinks tho does protest too much, Pervert Paul

|Whereas a quick Google on your posting is a history is full of
|accusations of your pedo involvements.

<laffs> You read it on Google? Just like this article......(BSEG)

|>
|> |http://fourq.host.sk/img/Les_TheApauling.jpg
|>
|> Such a hamdsome looking man.
|>
|
|You're a bit on the short side to be considered a man, dwarf maybe.

Says the, Mental Midget.

|How tall are you exactly Leslie, have you got a few big cushions under
|your seat to lift you upto the keyboard. Eyes just peeking over the
|desktop, ey lil fella?

It's always telling when me slave emulates his master. <laffs>
--
X=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
Join the Pirate Party! http://www.pirate-party.us
Sharkpost Home http://www.sharkpost.net
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Pedophile-Supporter Jack 'GitRDunn' Cohen uses the First
Amendment Rights argument to protect the rights of kiddie
porn posters and pedophiles to post what they "likes".

From: Jack 'GitRDunn' Cohen <Git@RDunn.hk>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:28:49 EST
Message-ID: <5RThj.26$6F6.8@trndny09>

I hate pedos and pervs as much as anyone else but I
don't have the right to stop them from their first
amendment rights to post what "they" like.



X=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

4Q wrote:
> TheApostle wrote:
>> This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
>> Message-ID:<<6612850c-660a-4f9c-88af-9753a06e22e7@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>>
>> may be monitored for quality assurance:
>>>
>>> TheApostle wrote:
>>>> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
>>>> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
>>>
>>>> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie.
>>>> <snickers>
>>>
>>> That's because you are Leslie dumbass.
>>
>> Sure it is sweetie, you just keep telling yourself that
>> and maybe Running Rhonda will believe you ... <laffs>
>>
>>> And Leslie is a nice sounding ghay name, it suits you.
>>
>> You like ghey sounds eh, Pedo Paul!! <HAHAHAHAAH>
>
> "Pedo Paul"? I've never been accused of
> being a pedo before Leslie are you
> going to back this libelous statement
> up liar. Whereas a quick Google on your
> posting is a history is full of
> accusations of your pedo involvements.

He's gone over the edge, hasn't he.

He's like the crazy guy who used to frequent Palmer Square. Most of the
time, he was relatively harmless--quietly talking to the air. But every
now and again, the voices would tell him something, and he'd start
screaming and ranting at the passers-by.

Poor man.

>>> http://fourq.host.sk/img/Les_TheApauling.jpg
>>
>> Such a hamdsome looking man.
>>
>
> You're a bit on the short side to be
> considered a man, dwarf maybe. How
> tall are you exactly Leslie, have you
> got a few big cushions under your seat
> to lift you upto the keyboard. Eyes
> just peeking over the desktop, ey lil
> fella?
>
>
> ;]]

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Miller's Law: In order to understand what another
person is saying, you must assume that it is true
and try to imagine what it could be true of.

[4Q]

TheApostle wrote:
> This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
> Message-ID:<<c70d22cc-c864-44db-bfc9-2315ed370346
> @p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>>
> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |
> |TheApostle wrote:
> |> This post, 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
> |> Message-ID:<<6612850c-660a-4f9c-88af-9753a06e22e7@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>>
> |> may be monitored for quality assurance:
> |> |
> |> |TheApostle wrote:
> |> |> This post, gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx>
> |> |> Message-ID:<<Xns9A2CC69E122A9A5G2M61033T4QCY@204.153.245.2 2>>
> |> |
> |> |> very well. Look at how many people I have calling me Leslie. <snickers>
> |> |
> |> |That's because you are Leslie dumbass.
> |>
> |> Sure it is sweetie, you just keep telling yourself that
> |> and maybe Running Rhonda will believe you ... <laffs>
> |>
> |> |And Leslie is a nice sounding ghay name, it suits you.
> |>
> |> You like ghey sounds eh, Pedo Paul!! <HAHAHAHAAH>
> |
> |"Pedo Paul"?
>
> Yuppers.
>
> |I've never been accused of being a pedo before Leslie
>
> Perhaps, no one has seen your admissions
>
> ....but don't worry - that can be fixed (BSEG)!
>
> __________________________________________________ ____________________________
>
> From: 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus,,,alt.usenet.kooks
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:20:02 -0800 (PST)
> Message-ID: <b5e88821-60ae-46e0-beaf-439f2c55cbcf@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
>
> Stop and think for a minute why the clown is behind "SharkPost". A tool for
> uploading masses of files *alarm bells* to alt.binary.pictures Surely your
> pedophile hunter friends must have done some research on ways the pedos
> operate. Maybe you should get a few buddies to take a look, ey?
>
> __________________________________________________ ____________________________
>
> In this post you _admit_ that a Usenet posting tool named Sharkpost,
> whom you ignorantly claim that I am behind creating, is uploading
> masses of files, which you say raises *alarm bells* in reference to
> binary pictures being posted in to alt.binary.pictures, by "pedos".
>
> Watch how you get exposed, Pedophile Paul!
>
> Are you paying attention?????
>
> The _only_ way you would be able to know what program is being used in
> that group, to upload those files you claim are raising *alarm bells*,
> is if you are _downloading_ the headers, and thereby viewing the files
> being posted by those "pedo" ppl in those groups.
>
> Can you say BUSTED!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>

The problem with your analysis and where
it falls down is that the Google groups
reader cannot access "any" alt.binary.*
groups (read or write) and I do not
use/have an NSP.

* Looking back in your Google
archived history it can be seen that
accusing people of pedophiles is your
modus operandi

* There are several post where you are
accussed of your connections with pedo
sympathies.

* This tactic of yours is transparent

* The tool you are so proudly hosting,
promoting, defending "SharkPost" is a
Usenet mass uploader of binary files
and I would assume the kind of tool a
pervert would use.

* My heads up to AHM and Pedophile
trackers is that they should take a
closer look at you and your associates
involved with all mass binary file
uploader.

* As much as I like to taunt Dimbulb
for being a dimbulb. I do understand
that he has a passion for using his
hacking knowledge to track pedophiles
and it would be very silly of him not
to get wise to you before its too late.
And it would be great fun to see him
wise up fast like Rhonda did.


> |are you going to back this libelous statement up liar.
>
> Me thinks tho does protest too much, Pervert Paul
>

Now I can see why you have a long
history using these very same tactics.
You certainly are an interesting one
LesLIE, a real k00k. No wonder you
gravitated like a magnet to Dustin Cook.



> |Whereas a quick Google on your posting is a history is full of
> |accusations of your pedo involvements.
>
> <laffs> You read it on Google? Just like this article......(BSEG)
>
> |>
> |> |http://fourq.host.sk/img/Les_TheApauling.jpg
> |>
> |> Such a hamdsome looking man.
> |>
> |
> |You're a bit on the short side to be considered a man, dwarf maybe.
>
> Says the, Mental Midget.
>

Is your aggression linked to your
short stature, a small man syndrome?

http://fourq.host.sk/img/dwarf_apostle.jpg

http://fourq.host.sk/img/henri_apostle_lautrec.jpg





> |How tall are you exactly Leslie, have you got a few big cushions under
> |your seat to lift you upto the keyboard. Eyes just peeking over the
> |desktop, ey lil fella?
>
> It's always telling when me slave emulates his master. <laffs>

As I read more of your history I see
the exact same lames used on everyone
else. The "oh the irony", "lil fella"
Don't you have anything new?


4Q