Ad-Aware 2007

[Ed]

I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and it
seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.

Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
product. Does it run more efficiently or what?


Ed

[JD]

Ed wrote:
> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and it
> seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>
> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>
>
> Ed
>
Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not sure I
want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't think you
can upgrade.

http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
Operating Systems:
Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server 2003,
Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)

How do you do the manual updates?

--
JD..

[jmv]

"JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:PR1jj.136617$MJ6.5733@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> How do you do the manual updates?

Go here and click on Ad-Aware SE on the right side of the screen.
http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/

[Ed]

On 15/01/08 12:41, JD wrote:
> Ed wrote:
>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and it
>> seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>>
>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>>
>>
>> Ed
>>
> Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not sure I
> want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't think you
> can upgrade.
>
> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
> Operating Systems:
> Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server 2003,
> Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)


Oh well, I'm sticking with Ad-Aware SE then.

>
> How do you do the manual updates?
>

I usually wait for the heads up message on updates that
siljaline@nospam.com sends out to this newsgroup. And in that he
quotes the url for those doing the manual update. I think the url is:

http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/

Ed

[Ed]

On 15/01/08 13:10, FredW wrote:
> Ed laid this down on her/his screen :
>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and it
>> seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>
>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>
> Lavasoft AdAware 2007 is not for Windows98:
> http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_...hp?t=techspecs
>
> Why don't you switch to SuperAntiSpyware (Free):
> http://www.superantispyware.com/download.html
> System requirements: Windows 98, 98SE, ME, 2000, XP, Vista
> http://www.superantispyware.com/superantispyware.html
>


I run both Ad-Aware SE and SuperAntiSpyware. And Spybot S&D.

Ed

[JD]

jmv wrote:
> "JD" <JD@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:PR1jj.136617$MJ6.5733@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> How do you do the manual updates?
>
> Go here and click on Ad-Aware SE on the right side of the screen.
> http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/
>
>
Got them, thanks!

--
JD..

[JD]

Ed wrote:
> On 15/01/08 12:41, JD wrote:
>> Ed wrote:
>>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and
>>> it seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>>>
>>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>> Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not sure
>> I want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't think
>> you can upgrade.
>>
>> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
>> Operating Systems:
>> Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server
>> 2003, Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)
>
>
> Oh well, I'm sticking with Ad-Aware SE then.
>
>>
>> How do you do the manual updates?
>>
>
> I usually wait for the heads up message on updates that
> siljaline@nospam.com sends out to this newsgroup. And in that he
> quotes the url for those doing the manual update. I think the url is:
>
> http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/
>
> Ed
>
>
>
Got them, thanks!

--
JD..

[JD]

Ed wrote:
> On 15/01/08 12:41, JD wrote:
>> Ed wrote:
>>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and
>>> it seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>>>
>>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>> Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not sure
>> I want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't think
>> you can upgrade.
>>
>> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
>> Operating Systems:
>> Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server
>> 2003, Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)
>
>
> Oh well, I'm sticking with Ad-Aware SE then.
>
>>
>> How do you do the manual updates?
>>
>
> I usually wait for the heads up message on updates that
> siljaline@nospam.com sends out to this newsgroup. And in that he
> quotes the url for those doing the manual update. I think the url is:
>
> http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/
>
> Ed
>
>
>
Got them but now Ad-Aware SE says my defs may be out of date although it
shows the correct def date as 14.01.08.

--
JD..

[Ed]

On 16/01/08 13:02, JD wrote:
> Ed wrote:
>> On 15/01/08 12:41, JD wrote:
>>> Ed wrote:
>>>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and
>>>> it seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>>>>
>>>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>>>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>> Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not sure
>>> I want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't think
>>> you can upgrade.
>>>
>>> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
>>> Operating Systems:
>>> Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server
>>> 2003, Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)
>>
>>
>> Oh well, I'm sticking with Ad-Aware SE then.
>>
>>>
>>> How do you do the manual updates?
>>>
>>
>> I usually wait for the heads up message on updates that
>> siljaline@nospam.com sends out to this newsgroup. And in that he
>> quotes the url for those doing the manual update. I think the url is:
>>
>> http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
> Got them but now Ad-Aware SE says my defs may be out of date although it
> shows the correct def date as 14.01.08.
>

Yes, I get a similar message too that says my defs are 730384 days out
of date!!

I don't know how to deal with that problem.

Maybe someone here can help?

Ed

[JD]

Ed wrote:
> On 16/01/08 13:02, JD wrote:
>> Ed wrote:
>>> On 15/01/08 12:41, JD wrote:
>>>> Ed wrote:
>>>>> I've been using Ad-Aware SE for some years now under Windows 98 and
>>>>> it seems to work fine apart from that I now have to do manual updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apart from that, is there any advantage in moving on to the 2007
>>>>> product. Does it run more efficiently or what?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed
>>>>>
>>>> Like you, I've been using Ad-Aware SE for many years and I'm not
>>>> sure I want to upgrade to Ad-Aware 2007 Free. In your case, I don't
>>>> think you can upgrade.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/...hp?t=techspecs
>>>> Operating Systems:
>>>> Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XP (Home and Pro), Windows Server
>>>> 2003, Windows 2000 (Pro and Server)
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh well, I'm sticking with Ad-Aware SE then.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you do the manual updates?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I usually wait for the heads up message on updates that
>>> siljaline@nospam.com sends out to this newsgroup. And in that he
>>> quotes the url for those doing the manual update. I think the url is:
>>>
>>> http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Got them but now Ad-Aware SE says my defs may be out of date although
>> it shows the correct def date as 14.01.08.
>>
>
> Yes, I get a similar message too that says my defs are 730384 days out
> of date!!
>
> I don't know how to deal with that problem.
>
> Maybe someone here can help?
>
> Ed
>
Probably because we're manually updating? It still scans and works OK,
right?

--
JD..