On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:40:11 -0500, TheApostle
<likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote:

>This post, <KooK Krusher>
>Message-ID:<<hopqo3l588n7tp5e65ugk7a120qcmmcja6@4ax.com>>
>may be monitored for quality assurance:
>|
>|On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:04:37 -0500, TheApostle
>|<likes-to-****@mailme.org> wrote:
>|
>[..]
>|>
>|>Recently, Jack 'GitRDunn' Cohen expressed his pedophile thoughts about my
>|>pre-teen neice.
>|>
>|> From: GitRDunn <Git@RDunn.hk>
>|> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
>|> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:54:55 GMT
>|> Message-ID: <jW8ij.81$s67.30@trndny05>
>|>
>|> "Your niece sounds like a tasty little morsel.
>|>
>|>Since he had _expressed_ these thoughts, I was able to tell him to keep his
>|>pedophile thoughts out of the group.
>|>
>|>It is not me professing to know how a pedophile thinks, merely me witnesssing
>|>the thoughts of a pedophile as he wrote them..
>|
>|How did you recognize the thoughts of a pedophile when you yourself
>|claim you must be one to recognize their thinking? Tell it to someone
>|that believes your backpedaling, kook.
>
>Are you really this stupid - you must be.
>
>First off,
>
>No, I did not claim that I could not recognize the thoughts of a pedophile.
>
>If you were to tell me that you wanted to have sexual relations with a enfant
>child - clearly those would be one of the many pedophile thoughts you are
>expressing.
>
>Secondly,
>
>Read this closely.
>
>I'm not professing to know what a pedophile thinks.
>
>That does not mean that I cannot recognize the thoughts of a pediophile when
>they are freely expressing those thoughts in a public group. I am edcuated
>enough to know that when a grown adult has sexual fantasies about young
>children he is a pedophile.
>
>When he expresses these thoughts - he is expressing his pedophile thoughts.
>
>You, on the other hand do not know very much, and I feel sorry that you have
>to continually humiliate yourself. Even more so with the beliefs that a reply
>to a person is a "Boot****" and educating your stupid ass is a "backpedal".
>
>A "Backpedal" is when a person changes their position.
>
> "It means to try to reverse direction in a metaphorical sense. It is
> often used to describe someone who says something and then tries to
> take it back. Politicians are often accused of back peddling when they
> say something controversial. The metaphor comes from riding a bicycle.
> If you try to make it go in reverse you can peddle backwards, but on
> most bikes the gears just spin futilely. Which is the same result as
> trying to unsay something you've already said. It is futile."
>
>Similar to when Bill Clinton had stated that he had no had sexual intercourse
>with that woman, and later changed his story to state he had. Or President GW
>Bush had said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and now they do not.
>
>I have not changed my position.
>
>I have stated I do not profess to know what pedophile think. I have stated
>that many pedophiles have _expressed_ their thoughts in these groups and I
>have had words with them urging them to keep their sexual fantasies out of
>these groups.
>
>This is how you "BOOT****" someone --- I hope you're taking notes <smiles>
>
>Do..... try again. <laughs out loud>

Give it up kook. We all watched you defend a pedo for months on end.
Do you always jump to the defense of someone you don't know when
others confront him with his past?