Re: virus

[pcbutts1]

I'll see what I can dig up.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:fc7bd113-3280-4abf-81e2-b456819ccd21@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> > Before starting my own company about 8 years ago I ran a development
>> > shop with more than 2000 programmers, myself having been a programmer
>> > since the 70's, in more than 0xF languages over that time. I've always
>> > been a hardware guy, having to write/build my own boards in those days,
>> > just to be able to run machines and automated process systems. Coding
>> > in
>> > machine language was the norm and is often the only way to write code
>> > for the small systems that control equipment. In the early days we even
>> > had to erase the EPROMS using "Grow" lamps because we could not afford
>> > the UV Lamps 13 Hours to erase on EPROM to try again. I loved it
>> > when
>> > we got our first assembler software, no more hex!
>>
>> What a crock of ****, Prove it!
>>
>
> *haha* Yes I see what you've done there
> Liarthos makes up some cock and bull
> story trying to con everyone into
> believing he knows something about code
> uses a load of buzz words to give his
> tale some depth... then you come along
> and **** his fantasy up by saying
> "prove it" That's cruel!
>
> He's already lost his ****in shirt this
> weekend making a complete twat of
> himself confusing ASM code with a HEX
> signature... And you yer ******* have
> to go and make his life a misery by
> pulling the "prove it" trick out of the
> hat!
>
>
> 4Q
> p.s. have got any pictures of Liarthos
> for me, ones without him munching on
> **** I mean? For his new webpage.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in
> news:hqydnSDnKO-PqPjanZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk:
>
>> "Leythos" wrote:
>>
>>> not@home.today says...
>>>> It appears you can't tell the difference between what I have said
>>>> and what 4Q has said.
>>>
>>> Yes, that was correct, I made the mistake of thinking your post was
>>> from the childish liar - they had the same tone and I don't look at
>>> the "From" on posts or read headers unless needed.
>>
>> Oops! That was careless.
>>
>>> Yep, I didn't read your other posts, as a mentioned above in this
>>> reply, because I assumed you were that idiot 4Q.
>>>
>>> I apologize for confusing you with that idiot 4q.
>>
>> Accepted (the apology, that is). 4Q's fight is with Dustin Cook, a
>> reformed virus writer. 4Q doesn't believe (in reality or for the sake
>> of performance art) that Cook has put aside his malicious tendencies.
>> Those two go back a long way.
>
> 4Q doesn't really care about malicious tendencies. He's just using
> that for material to justify the trolling manevuers. His fight
> started with me after being turned down for shell accounts he needs
> for his information harvesting bots.

No it didn't.

> I turned him down simply because
> he's an arsehole and everytime I've provided him access of any sort
> in the past, he's abused it in some way shape or form.

No you didn't. You posted why you didn't give him what he asked for, and
this isn't the reason. Stop rewriting history, Dustin.

> 4Q can badmouth me all he likes, it isn't doing as much harm as he
> wishes. People can and do change, and whether or not he likes it, I'm
> not the same individual I was nearly 8 years ago.

You just don't get it, Dustin. Not now, not ever.

Leythos is not a bad guy, so I don't know why he's taken up for you. But
it sure is interesting that as soon as you think you've got a little
support, you're right back at it again.

Will you ever stand on your own two feet?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[Leythos]

In article <5soofgF1a5t1kU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
says...
> Leythos is not a bad guy, so I don't know why he's taken up for you.

Rhonda, look at my posts, I didn't stick up for Dust, I asked 4Q to
prove his claim, that's not quite the same.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <fk77h5$jdu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, pcbutts1
@leythosthestalker.com says...
> I'll see what I can dig up.

Oh, come on, you know you have a predisposition for anal things, for
male oriented pornography and even bestiality - it's all on your website
where your claim to help people. You should easily be able to steal some
more porn and cobble images together into something else you claim is
your own.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[4Q]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > "Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in
> > news:hqydnSDnKO-PqPjanZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk:
> >
> >> "Leythos" wrote:
> >>
> >>> not@home.today says...
> >>>> It appears you can't tell the difference between what I have said
> >>>> and what 4Q has said.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, that was correct, I made the mistake of thinking your post was
> >>> from the childish liar - they had the same tone and I don't look at
> >>> the "From" on posts or read headers unless needed.
> >>
> >> Oops! That was careless.
> >>
> >>> Yep, I didn't read your other posts, as a mentioned above in this
> >>> reply, because I assumed you were that idiot 4Q.
> >>>
> >>> I apologize for confusing you with that idiot 4q.
> >>
> >> Accepted (the apology, that is). 4Q's fight is with Dustin Cook, a
> >> reformed virus writer. 4Q doesn't believe (in reality or for the sake
> >> of performance art) that Cook has put aside his malicious tendencies.
> >> Those two go back a long way.
> >
> > 4Q doesn't really care about malicious tendencies. He's just using
> > that for material to justify the trolling manevuers. His fight
> > started with me after being turned down for shell accounts he needs
> > for his information harvesting bots.
>
> No it didn't.
>

*heh* It's amazing that Dustbin keeps
harping on about that ****. I've never
trusted that ****. What's weird, he has
another tale up his sleeve that he
pulls out like a magic trick from time
to time, and you know what, he spins it
so well I half believe it myself
sometimes (till I give myself a wakeup
slap).


Apparently out of the goodness of his
heart he asked Gigabyte to give me an
account on Coderz.net II, but what the
little **** tries to brush over is that
I have this account on HOST.SK with
a shell and long before Giga got her
stupid mitts on Coderz II,,, Now why
the **** would I want an account on
Coderz without a shell, hosted by some
idiot that can't admin or secure a box
(a school kid)... the only thing I'd
do with Coderz II is the same thing I'd
did with Coderz I... root the ****er
(however Coderz II was already 0wned by
a hacker I know).

Anyhow a little while later Rob gave me
a shell account on his vmyths network
(of course I behaved myself, and
promised Rob I wouldn't **** with his
network)... Now if you look back a
few years ago in the ACV Google
archives you will see that malicious
twat Raid / Dustbin Cook tried to get
my account cancelled, telling Rob all
sorts of **** that I couldnt be trusted

It's a joke for ****house Dustbin to
think I would land my feet under a box
of his, given the long history between
us... I don't trust him, I never have.
The only thing I would do with HHI if
I got my hands on it would be to turn
the ****er it into a molton block of
metal, there would be a burnt hole in
the server floor where it once stood. ;]]

Nah, I BCC'd a load of people with the
same message for a legitimate shell
account... but the message was for Rob
Rosenberger, to get him to pull his
finger out so I could set up my infobot
on IRC... (this was part of the
Google grepping project that Jimbob
Fagen keeps reminding me of). I even
joked about it to Kadaicha Man, asking
for a shell... Anyway Rob never came
up with the goods (he did offer me
something else though)... in the
meanwhile I could do the same thing
with HOST.SK and the Expect toolkit.
Run *****X on a public server control'd
by my local *nix box running the Expect
interface to the infobot.

The thing that pissed me off about that
clown Dust**** was after he posted
on a thread back in February regarding
the ACVSC source code. He started the
**** about Rapture again and here's the
red rag to a bull the "non-coder"
remark... It's true that I'm not known
outside of some very close circles
as a coder and that's because I don't
tell people like Dustbin what I do
(or what I've done) I've seen too many
hackers and VXers profiled because they
tell their little secrets to some
tithead like Raid or Gigabyte...
(Now the Coderz box is in the hands of
the Police, complete with all the
details of about half the VX community)
All those people that met that stupid
school girl in real life or emailed her
their details ended up nicely stored
in some FBI evidence box in the USA.

Hows that for an Underground scene?!?
All the lamers tagged and marked
because they let stupid teenagers
like malicious Raid or Gigabyte hold their fate.

http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/Gigabyte/


> > I turned him down simply because
> > he's an arsehole and everytime I've provided him access of any sort
> > in the past, he's abused it in some way shape or form.
>
> No you didn't. You posted why you didn't give him what he asked for, and
> this isn't the reason. Stop rewriting history, Dustin.
>


And the last thing that pissed me off
about the clown Dustbin was his
constant bull**** regarding the shell
Did anyone notice what he said around
the time I lost my rag with the ****?
"Oh you had an account 3 weeks ago
but I decided to hold you off" It's
like a 6th sense , I knew the **** was
****ing around and this confirmed
that nagging doubt people sense when
they deal with an untrustworthy twat
like him. Everyone has experianced those
type of people, it's a malicious game
for them.

> > 4Q can badmouth me all he likes, it isn't doing as much harm as he
> > wishes. People can and do change, and whether or not he likes it, I'm
> > not the same individual I was nearly 8 years ago.
>
> You just don't get it, Dustin. Not now, not ever.

That's what kind of bugs me, is that
I know Dustbin is upto no good but you
can never 100% prove it. The **** will
continue to be a career criminal and
a malicious cretin, and he'll continue
to laugh at Liarthos, Lipman, and the
others behind their back knowing that
he's secretly ****ing them over (in
the mind)... Not that I could really
give a crap he's going to screw them,
it's the fact I know what he's like
but I cannot get the message through.


>
> Leythos is not a bad guy, so I don't know why he's taken up for you. But
> it sure is interesting that as soon as you think you've got a little
> support, you're right back at it again.
>
> Will you ever stand on your own two feet?

I hope he drags Liarthos down with him
Liarthos is an ideal candidate for the
4Q site. The mightier they think they
are the harder they get kicked up the
arse... And it makes people laugh.

Liarthos has really made a hole for
himself, he thought he was being clever
but all he's managed to do is show
himself up for a liar about his flakey
knowledge of code... Oh and confirm
that I'm a troll (What a****in Sherlock
Holmes detective he is, ey!)


4Q (Big bad Troll, and I don't give a ****)

[4Q]

Dustbin Cook wrote:

<snip>
>
> He's a leech, always has been.
>

Stupid ****, a leech is a very specific
thing. I'm a parasite (generic)

Parasites are wonderful things...

I wonder if anyone still has the video
I uploaded to 4Q site about the life
cycle of a parasite... The parasite
that target tadpoles and burrow into
their developing limbs, so that the
frog develops multiple legs. Of course
the frog is then easily caught be their
predators the 'heron'. The parasite
develops in the herons gut, sexually
reproduces and the lovely little baby
parasites are pooped back out into the
water to find new tadpoles... and the
wonderful cycle continues. Now that is
amazing the fact nature has developed
a way to manipulate a closed loop.

See if you were actually interested in
virus and malware rather than just
being a malicious ****, you'd see the
beauty of parasites too.


4Q

[James Egan]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:49:06 -0800 (PST), 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com>
wrote:

>Jim, yer bitter because Liarthos has
>stolen your place in the queue ;]P

I have to admit it did cross my mind. I've been waiting years.


Jim

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Leythos wrote:
> In article <5soofgF1a5t1kU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
> says...
>> Leythos is not a bad guy, so I don't know why he's taken up for you.
>
> Rhonda, look at my posts, I didn't stick up for Dust, I asked 4Q to
> prove his claim, that's not quite the same.

True.

For me, there are two issues re Dustin. The first is hilarity. He has
shown time and again that no one has to troll him, because he gets right
in there, grabs the hook, baits it, sticks it in his own mouth and
swallows hard.

The second, though, is serious. I don't really believe that Bughunter is
dangerous at the moment. What Dustin has proved, however, is that he's
not stable, and when he becomes angry, he also becomes dangerous. If one
must deal with those who live to avenge petty wrongs with nuclear
devices, it is always best to be safe rather than sorry. For example, I
still have a copy of an early version of Bughunter, but I will never
again use the program because I simply don't trust Dustin.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle