Re: virus

[Leythos]

In article <11c5b99d-df2f-4309-92a5-07fee772eef4
@e67g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <e447988f-8924-4301-93a6-cac878fa5425
> > @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> > > Even Dustbin can vouch for my code, but
> > > I doubt he can vouch for you, even thou
> > > you'r his biggest (idiot) supporter.
> >
> > Just noticed, you're telling lies again. I've NOT supported him in this
> > thread once, not at all, but I can see how a liar like you would take my
> > asking for proof as supporting him.
> >
> > I read your post, that he's hiding stuff, and I asked for proof, you
> > posted a snippet of 6 commands, which proves NOTHING.
> >
> > Still waiting for you to back up your claims - and it has nothing to do
> > with Dust, not a thing, it has to do with you not being able to prove
> > what you've posted.
> >
>
> I've looked all over this post and I
> can't see any of your code Liarthos

Until you provide proof of your claim that Dust is producing virus code
you won't.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <3b290def-b588-45d4-af2e-
61ca216302bd@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
says...
> More smoke and mirrors ey, Liarthos?

You posted the following and I asked for proof:

> Another regular from ACV "Ant" also
> discovered that Dust**** has been
> hiding other **** into his malware
> trojan, namely hiding the signature of
> the packer he uses (a trick used by
> malware writers)
>
> Well done Julie, well done Ant for
> exposing the ****e meister D. Cook

Where is the proof that it's maware?

Still unable to provide the proof because you don't really know, not at
all, you've show everyone that you don't have the skill to prove that
Dust is producing malware....

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <fad2b454-d587-4fe4-8d7e-511050395309@
1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> > > > CLAIMING IT and yet not one
> > > > single bit of "PROOF" has been posted.
> > >
>
> I proved it.
>
> *He's always been malicious, he never
> stopped. Checkout the signature exposed
> by Ant.

No, you've quoted something that was not reported as what you say.

Prove that the "Signature" makes it malicious - you specifically said
"malware trojan" - prove that the snippet of code makes his code a
trojan and/or malware.

I've yet to see anything from you that indicates you can even read code
- I certainly expect you to keep running from the claim you made - so,
either prove it was malware or continue to look like a little troll
coward that got exposed as another liar.



--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <6d453b27-696d-4807-880e-407d3a544b21
@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> It just makes your
> credibility evaporate away when you
> make these basic errors, Grandad.

Read the above, it applies directly to you. You've NOT SHOWN THE CODE HE
PRODUCES TO HE MALICIOUS. I'm still waiting for you to support your
claim and you've diverted from it with every post sonny, so post the
code that has the trojan or you will be seen as a liar for a long time.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Ant]

"4Q" wrote:

> Ant wrote:
>> "Leythos" wrote:
>>> - show, exactly, where his code is malicious
>>
>> That will be difficult, since I don't actually believe it is.
>
> *heh* That's the art of a good skank,

Maybe, but I'm inclined to think he wouldn't attempt it.

> Btw did you read the archives about
> his "Stormtrooper" idea?

No, I wasn't aware of that. Unless it comes up quickly with suitable
search keywords I don't fancy trawling around for it.

> *Awe* Ant you are too much of a
> gentleman for your own good.

Well, I try to be fair to all parties!

> I don't
> know why you've labeled that stupid
> twat one of the "good guys", he does
> nothing but stalk Butts and support
> Dustbin the criminal, have you ever
> seen anything technical from him that
> would make you believe he has a clue?

I believe his field is network management and firewalls, on which he
gives advice. As for binary analysis, malware, your role in ACV or
Dustin's history, perhaps not.

[Ant]

"Leythos" wrote:

> not@home.today says...
>> It appears you can't tell the difference between what I have said and
>> what 4Q has said.
>
> Yes, that was correct, I made the mistake of thinking your post was from
> the childish liar - they had the same tone and I don't look at the
> "From" on posts or read headers unless needed.

Oops! That was careless.

> Yep, I didn't read your other posts, as a mentioned above in this reply,
> because I assumed you were that idiot 4Q.
>
> I apologize for confusing you with that idiot 4q.

Accepted (the apology, that is). 4Q's fight is with Dustin Cook, a
reformed virus writer. 4Q doesn't believe (in reality or for the sake
of performance art) that Cook has put aside his malicious tendencies.
Those two go back a long way.

[Ant]

"pcbutts1" wrote:

> I don't put people in my sig file for no reason. Get a
> ****ing clue.

That's funny coming from someone who thinks "George Orwell", a nym
used by an anonymising service, is attributable to any particular
person.

[pcbutts1]

I know exactly what a George Orwell is. Has any George Orwell ever gave any
helpful advice in this or any group? Go ahead and do your Google search now
to try and prove me wrong.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in message
news:hqydnSPnKO-OqPjanZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk...
> "pcbutts1" wrote:
>
>> I don't put people in my sig file for no reason. Get a
>> ****ing clue.
>
> That's funny coming from someone who thinks "George Orwell", a nym
> used by an anonymising service, is attributable to any particular
> person.
>
>

[Leythos]

In article <hqydnSDnKO-PqPjanZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
not@home.today says...
> "Leythos" wrote:
>
> > not@home.today says...
> >> It appears you can't tell the difference between what I have said and
> >> what 4Q has said.
> >
> > Yes, that was correct, I made the mistake of thinking your post was from
> > the childish liar - they had the same tone and I don't look at the
> > "From" on posts or read headers unless needed.
>
> Oops! That was careless.
>
> > Yep, I didn't read your other posts, as a mentioned above in this reply,
> > because I assumed you were that idiot 4Q.
> >
> > I apologize for confusing you with that idiot 4q.
>
> Accepted (the apology, that is). 4Q's fight is with Dustin Cook, a
> reformed virus writer. 4Q doesn't believe (in reality or for the sake
> of performance art) that Cook has put aside his malicious tendencies.
> Those two go back a long way.

Yep, I had 4Q in my KF for a long time and purged it a couple days ago,
that's when I saw his claim that Dust was creating malware again...

I asked him to prove it and he snipped something you wrote and pasted it
here and made the claim it was proof that Dust was writing a trojan...

So far, 4Q has only been able to prove he knows how to type, not to code
and certainly not that Dust is doing bad....

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Ant]

"Leythos" wrote:

> not@home.today says...
>> Accepted (the apology, that is). 4Q's fight is with Dustin Cook, a
>> reformed virus writer. 4Q doesn't believe (in reality or for the sake
>> of performance art) that Cook has put aside his malicious tendencies.
>> Those two go back a long way.
>
> Yep, I had 4Q in my KF for a long time and purged it a couple days ago,
> that's when I saw his claim that Dust was creating malware again...
>
> I asked him to prove it and he snipped something you wrote and pasted it
> here and made the claim it was proof that Dust was writing a trojan...

He originally posted a link to a post where I implicitly questioned
the use of an executable obfuscation technique. I showed that did not
prevent me from analysing the binary.

I was interested in why Dustin had used this trick of malware writers.
That is to say, not just the exe-packing alone but the additional
obfuscation to hide the packer. Subsequent exchanges revealed why; it
appears that old habits die hard. I guess 4Q views this as proof
enough that there is mischief afoot, maybe not now but perhaps at some
future date. However, I don't hold that view.