In article <FNmdnXoX94AQRfjanZ2dnUVZ8h6dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk >,
not@home.today says...
> I was interested in why Dustin had used this trick of malware writers.
> That is to say, not just the exe-packing alone but the additional
> obfuscation to hide the packer.

I can understand that line of thinking and even agree with it - there is
little reason to hide like that.

Maybe Dust will explain here for you/us?

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.