Re: virus

[Leythos]

In article <FNmdnXoX94AQRfjanZ2dnUVZ8h6dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk >,
not@home.today says...
> I was interested in why Dustin had used this trick of malware writers.
> That is to say, not just the exe-packing alone but the additional
> obfuscation to hide the packer.

I can understand that line of thinking and even agree with it - there is
little reason to hide like that.

Maybe Dust will explain here for you/us?

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <Xns9A091B770FF6BHHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
bughunter.dustin@gmail.com says...
> Leythos, I thank you for calling 4Q on his activities which have been
> going on for far too long. I wonder tho how far this is going to go.
> You've clearly seen 4Q for what he really is.

Dust, don't take this wrong, but I would have called into question his
posting about anyone, it's not specific to you or in defense of you
personally.

I've already seen him in action, and should have kept him in my KF, as
he's an incompetent little twit that his mother should not let on her
computer any more

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[James Morrow]

In article <MPG.21ce45bcd54af3fc9898d0@Adfree.usenet.com>,
void@nowhere.lan says...
> In article <e447988f-8924-4301-93a6-cac878fa5425
> @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> > You've been called out, so put up or
> > shut up.
>
> You posted:
>
> > Another regular from ACV "Ant" also
> > discovered that Dust**** has been
> > hiding other **** into his malware
> > trojan, namely hiding the signature of
> > the packer he uses (a trick used by
> > malware writers)
> >
> > Well done Julie, well done Ant for
> > exposing the ****e meister D. Cook
>
> And I asked you for proof that He's "Hiding" something - you've not
> posted "Proof" once, that was YOUR POST CLAIMING IT and yet not one
> single bit of "PROOF" has been posted.
>

Gash! Why everybody knows that if you repeat a claim often enough it
must be true. We in this group are just one big cornspearasee.


--
James E. Morrow
Email to: jamesemorrow@email.com

[Leythos]

In article <06ceca57-8e3e-44c4-a62f-
c9bb295fd2cc@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
says...
> my latest ca

You might want to look in the mirror son, you exposed yourself as a liar
and unethical hack with no honor or morals.

So, keep showing yourself to be a fool, you're doing a good job of it.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <797dfd33-67d5-431c-9745-b1ca8a9ee0f6
@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> Liarthos wrote:
> > In article <06ceca57-8e3e-44c4-a62f-
> > c9bb295fd2cc@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
> > says...
> > > my latest ca
> >
> > You might want to look in the mirror son, you exposed yourself as a liar
> > and unethical hack with no honor or morals.
>
> *haha* Awe, poor Liarthos, he doesn't
> know which way to pull trying to spit
> the hook out.
>
> http://fourq.host.sk/chars/Liarthos/
>
> Keep checking the page, newly caught
> losers are always great fun to watch
> while they learn how to live with the
> hook.

In honor of your confirmed status as a liar, troll, unskilled non-
programmer, unable to even follow your own posts, I'll give you the
pleasure of the last post - you seem to be the type of kid that needs
that.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Julie]

James Morrow wrote:
> In article <MPG.21ce45bcd54af3fc9898d0@Adfree.usenet.com>,
> void@nowhere.lan says...
>> In article <e447988f-8924-4301-93a6-cac878fa5425
>> @q77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
>>> You've been called out, so put up or
>>> shut up.
>>
>> You posted:
>>
>>> Another regular from ACV "Ant" also
>>> discovered that Dust**** has been
>>> hiding other **** into his malware
>>> trojan, namely hiding the signature of
>>> the packer he uses (a trick used by
>>> malware writers)
>>>
>>> Well done Julie, well done Ant for
>>> exposing the ****e meister D. Cook
>>
>> And I asked you for proof that He's "Hiding" something - you've not
>> posted "Proof" once, that was YOUR POST CLAIMING IT and yet not one
>> single bit of "PROOF" has been posted.
>>
>
> Gash! Why everybody knows that if you repeat a claim often enough it
> must be true. We in this group are just one big cornspearasee.

/NOW/ you've caught on.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Ant]

"James Egan" wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:55:40 -0000, "Ant" <not@home.today> wrote:
>>I guess 4Q views this as proof
>>enough that there is mischief afoot
>
> I don't guess that and I have difficulty believing that you believe
> it.

Perhaps I didn't put that very well - it's not meant to indicate my
belief about what 4Q really believes but a conclusion one might draw
based on seeing what had been done to the executable.

> Putting diplomacy to one side because it's adding credence to
> fourqueue's claim where it's undeserved,

In the same post I said I held a different view.

> it's far more likely that
> fourqueue doesn't believe what he's saying any more than you or I do
> and it's all one very long drawn out troll.

In my post prior to that you'll notice I used the phrase "in reality
or for the sake of performance art" when referring to his beliefs.
Whatever he believes there's no doubt he prefers to discount Dustin's
explanation for the obfuscation and use my analysis in pursuance of
his 'art'.

> That russian business seems to have had an adverse effect on you
> speaking your mind, which if I may say so you do very fairly and
> accurately the vast majority of the time.

I don't know what you mean. Are you saying I should not have
apologised to Mr Ivanov for my error? I had no problem doing that.

[Ant]

"Leythos" wrote:

> not@home.today says...
>> I was interested in why Dustin had used this trick of malware writers.
>> That is to say, not just the exe-packing alone but the additional
>> obfuscation to hide the packer.
>
> I can understand that line of thinking and even agree with it - there is
> little reason to hide like that.
>
> Maybe Dust will explain here for you/us?

He already did, in links I gave earlier.

[pcbutts1]

> Before starting my own company about 8 years ago I ran a development
> shop with more than 2000 programmers, myself having been a programmer
> since the 70's, in more than 0xF languages over that time. I've always
> been a hardware guy, having to write/build my own boards in those days,
> just to be able to run machines and automated process systems. Coding in
> machine language was the norm and is often the only way to write code
> for the small systems that control equipment. In the early days we even
> had to erase the EPROMS using "Grow" lamps because we could not afford
> the UV Lamps 13 Hours to erase on EPROM to try again. I loved it when
> we got our first assembler software, no more hex!

What a crock of ****, Prove it!

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.21d03aaa2e5809cf9898f4@Adfree.usenet.com. ..
> In article <hqydnSHnKO-MqPjanZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>,
> not@home.today says...
>> I believe his field is network management and firewalls, on which he
>> gives advice. As for binary analysis, malware, your role in ACV or
>> Dustin's history, perhaps not.
>

[James Egan]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:32:46 -0000, "Ant" <not@home.today> wrote:

>
>I don't know what you mean. Are you saying I should not have
>apologised to Mr Ivanov for my error? I had no problem doing that.
>

Never mind.