Re: virus

[Leythos]

In article <7f05da1e-433c-4931-ad79-
c5155580c49a@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
says...
> Julie wrote:
> > Kimlagoon wrote:
> > > can any one tell how to download a virus. I have been virus free for
> > > a long time and its become very boring.
> >
> > Download "Bughunter" -- it's full of viruses.
> >
>
> Thanks for the useful tip off Julie.
>
> Another regular from ACV "Ant" also
> discovered that Dust**** has been
> hiding other **** into his malware
> trojan, namely hiding the signature of
> the packer he uses (a trick used by
> malware writers)
>
> Well done Julie, well done Ant for
> exposing the ****e meister D. Cook

Provide proof please

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <3cebac7e-0423-45a3-a2c1-
0e2b245bd11f@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <7f05da1e-433c-4931-ad79-
> > c5155580c49a@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
> > says...
> > > Julie wrote:
> > > > Kimlagoon wrote:
> > > > > can any one tell how to download a virus. I have been virus free for
> > > > > a long time and its become very boring.
> > > >
> > > > Download "Bughunter" -- it's full of viruses.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the useful tip off Julie.
> > >
> > > Another regular from ACV "Ant" also
> > > discovered that Dust**** has been
> > > hiding other **** into his malware
> > > trojan, namely hiding the signature of
> > > the packer he uses (a trick used by
> > > malware writers)
> > >
> > > Well done Julie, well done Ant for
> > > exposing the ****e meister D. Cook
> >
> > Provide proof please
>
>
> As you asked so nicely
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa

Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order to
prove that he's doing something malicious you would need to provide the
entire code of the malicious section.



--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <1e7b37ae-489b-4ba0-be1f-
7eb9ef3b99eb@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
says...
> > > As you asked so nicely
> > >
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa
> >
> > Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order to
>
> Sorry you don't know what the **** you
> are talking about... think of the "6
> commands" you mentioned as a redherring
> i.e. nothing much to do with Ant's
> original point re: the signature of the
> packer. Next time get a clue about why
> Ant put the first six lines of the ASIC disassembly up there before
> you make
> smartarse remarks.

Sorry, but I'm not going to believe someone is a hack unless you can
prove, beyond a doubt, that they are being malicious. Those six commands
prove nothing without the rest of the code.

You posted this saying that you had proof and you've not shown any
proof, you've shown 6 commands that have no impact on anything the way
they are presented. Show the rest of the code, then document how it's
malicious (since I bet there only a handful here that can actually read
assembler) and you will have a case - until that time you're just
blowing hot air.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <1fcc7f07-eb69-4f1f-841b-c8783dcde9d7
@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <1e7b37ae-489b-4ba0-be1f-
> > 7eb9ef3b99eb@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
> > says...
> > > > > As you asked so nicely
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order to
> > >
> > > Sorry you don't know what the **** you
> > > are talking about... think of the "6
> > > commands" you mentioned as a redherring
> > > i.e. nothing much to do with Ant's
> > > original point re: the signature of the
> > > packer. Next time get a clue about why
> > > Ant put the first six lines of the ASIC disassembly up there before
> > > you make
> > > smartarse remarks.
> >
> > Sorry, but I'm not going to believe someone is a hack unless you can
> > prove, beyond a doubt, that they are being malicious. Those six commands
> > prove nothing without the rest of the code.
>
> hmmm I notice you're still going on
> about "those six commands"

Because that's all you've posted.

> > You posted this saying that you had proof and you've not shown any
> > proof, you've shown 6 commands that have no impact on anything the way
> > they are presented. Show the rest of the code, then document how it's
> > malicious (since I bet there only a handful here that can actually read
> > assembler) and you will have a case - until that time you're just
> > blowing hot air.
>
> You are a total clueless **** aren't
> ya. Forget the "6 commands" (like as if
> you'd know what they were anyhow!!!
> malicious or not. *hint* NOT). The
> disassembly was uploaded for Dust****s
> benefit, just to deflate his fat head
> with the *pin* Ant was holding. What
> you keep failing to observe is the
> hex signature, *CLUE* stop looking at
> the disassembled code and look at the
> hex signatures.

And you don't seem to understand that you've posted a snippet without
proof of where it came from, that we have no proof of what you claim,
that you've only blown hot air so far.

If you've got proof of some wrong doing, post it.

You also need to get a real Usenet service, as you lack all credibility
by not being able to properly post (not to mention your history in these
and other groups).

So, either post proof or appear as a liar again.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Ant]

"Leythos" wrote:

> paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa
>
> Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order to
> prove that he's doing something malicious you would need to provide the
> entire code of the malicious section.

I posted that code snippet to show I'd removed the packer.

For my other thoughts on the matter, including Dustin's responses,
please see these messages which were posted only in ACV:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...f7e466a8fb55e4
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...f2870db02f95a5

[pcbutts1]

I like this part " lookout for the really stupid (that's people like you)
who will fall for anything." It describes Leythos to a "T"


--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz, Beauregard T.
Shagnasty,Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"4Q" <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:80492e29-f033-4f88-8611-2bee1498d2e3@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> Leythos wrote:
>> In article <1fcc7f07-eb69-4f1f-841b-c8783dcde9d7
>> @l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
>> > Leythos wrote:
>> > > In article <1e7b37ae-489b-4ba0-be1f-
>> > > 7eb9ef3b99eb@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com
>> > > says...
>> > > > > > As you asked so nicely
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order
>> > > > > to
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry you don't know what the **** you
>> > > > are talking about... think of the "6
>> > > > commands" you mentioned as a redherring
>> > > > i.e. nothing much to do with Ant's
>> > > > original point re: the signature of the
>> > > > packer. Next time get a clue about why
>> > > > Ant put the first six lines of the ASIC disassembly up there before
>> > > > you make
>> > > > smartarse remarks.
>> > >
>> > > Sorry, but I'm not going to believe someone is a hack unless you can
>> > > prove, beyond a doubt, that they are being malicious. Those six
>> > > commands
>> > > prove nothing without the rest of the code.
>> >
>> > hmmm I notice you're still going on
>> > about "those six commands"
>>
>> Because that's all you've posted.
>>
>
> You are either playing stupid (extemely
> well) or you are extremely stupid.
>
>> > > You posted this saying that you had proof and you've not shown any
>> > > proof, you've shown 6 commands that have no impact on anything the
>> > > way
>> > > they are presented. Show the rest of the code, then document how it's
>> > > malicious (since I bet there only a handful here that can actually
>> > > read
>> > > assembler) and you will have a case - until that time you're just
>> > > blowing hot air.
>> >
>> > You are a total clueless **** aren't
>> > ya. Forget the "6 commands" (like as if
>> > you'd know what they were anyhow!!!
>> > malicious or not. *hint* NOT). The
>> > disassembly was uploaded for Dust****s
>> > benefit, just to deflate his fat head
>> > with the *pin* Ant was holding. What
>> > you keep failing to observe is the
>> > hex signature, *CLUE* stop looking at
>> > the disassembled code and look at the
>> > hex signatures.
>>
>> And you don't seem to understand that you've posted a snippet without
>> proof of where it came from, that we have no proof of what you claim,
>> that you've only blown hot air so far.
>>
>> If you've got proof of some wrong doing, post it.
>>
>> You also need to get a real Usenet service, as you lack all credibility
>> by not being able to properly post (not to mention your history in these
>> and other groups).
>>
>> So, either post proof or appear as a liar again.
>>
>
> I conclude you are stupid. This is the
> Nth time you've posted and the Nth time
> the 0xDCFCBCCD clue has whooshed right
> over your numbskull.
>
> Now given no one has any doubt you have
> no credibility to comment on malware.
> I'll just add a few more pieces into
> the jigsaw (not for your clueless self)
> for the benefit of others.
>
> Dustbin Cook is a malware author (thou
> **** code), he has managed to grasp the
> basics of what is required to spread
> his ****. His training ground was IRC
> where he could infect the easy prey
> with DCC auto transfers.
>
> The above method is a very old and
> simple trick. You target the weaklings
> and unsuspecting with a Trojan horse
> gift disguised as areally good whatever
> The victim clicks on his *gift* and
> without a clue is now infected with an
> active malware Trojan. These tricks are
> a variant of email malware.
>
> New variations on the theme are
> invented because the old ones don't
> work as effectively. What your friend
> Dustbin is upto now is setting himself
> up a new infection vector based on
> the ignorant coming to him. You start
> off by establishing yourself a cover
> story... "the new reformed turd story"
> and you start peddling some heap of
> cobbled together crap *as the good
> stuff* meanwhile as per the old IRC
> days, you are on constant lookout for
> the really stupid (that's people like
> you) who will fall for anything.
>
> Once an easy target(s) has been
> selected they start to groom and court
> the hopeless victim. Next when the
> timing is right the *Trojanized* crud
> is swapped for the *cover story dupe*
> and instead of running the 'so called
> good guy stuff' they are running a pre
> loaded dropper with BO2K, Sub7, Netbus
> (take your pick)... along with the
> unhitched 'good stuff'
>
> You do know that your hero promised to
> release his "Stormtrooper" malware
> don't ya? Welcome to Dustbin's
> Stormtrooper crap. Do a bit of reseach
> on the ****o before you defend him to
> the hilt, Dustbin is the worst of the
> worst.
>
>
> 4Q
>
>

[Leythos]

In article <80492e29-f033-4f88-8611-2bee1498d2e3
@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> You do know that your hero promised to
> release his "Stormtrooper" malware
> don't ya? Welcome to Dustbin's
> Stormtrooper crap. Do a bit of reseach
> on the ****o before you defend him to
> the hilt, Dustbin is the worst of the
> worst.

And all you seem to be able to do is post trash, since you don't seem to
have any technical skills at all - If you've got the good on him then
post it, so far you've shown nothing.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Leythos]

In article <KaSdnY2QtbMpcP7anZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@brightview.co.uk >,
not@home.today says...
> "Leythos" wrote:
>
> > paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ea8cae456080aa
> >
> > Sorry, but 6 commands do not make it a malware problem. In order to
> > prove that he's doing something malicious you would need to provide the
> > entire code of the malicious section.
>
> I posted that code snippet to show I'd removed the packer.

So, you don't really have any proof, only a idea, and not enough skill
of your own to show the truth.....

If you've got any honor you will prove what you've said - show, exactly,
where his code is malicious - based on all your other posts I'm sure you
don't have half the skill needed to show what you've suggested.

--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Ant]

"Leythos" wrote:

> not@home.today says...
>> I posted that code snippet to show I'd removed the packer.
>
> So, you don't really have any proof, only a idea, and not enough skill
> of your own to show the truth.....

Read the links I provided and the conversation between myself and
Dustin Cook before you start making unfounded slurs against me.

> If you've got any honor you will prove what you've said

It appears you can't tell the difference between what I have said and
what 4Q has said.

> - show, exactly, where his code is malicious

That will be difficult, since I don't actually believe it is.

> - based on all your other posts I'm sure you
> don't have half the skill needed to show what you've suggested.

Oh, really? And how adept are you at analysing executable code? It's
quite obvious to me that you either haven't read or haven't understood
my other posts. If I were a self-confessed ******* like 4Q or a
shameless thief and purveyor of nastiness like Butts I'd call you
stupid. However, I've always thought you were one of the "good guys"
so I'll refrain from doing that.

[Leythos]

In article <ff41c909-a3db-4eca-869b-2b85d8435176
@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <80492e29-f033-4f88-8611-2bee1498d2e3
> > @r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, paul_zest@hushmail.com says...
> > > You do know that your hero promised to
> > > release his "Stormtrooper" malware
> > > don't ya? Welcome to Dustbin's
> > > Stormtrooper crap. Do a bit of reseach
> > > on the ****o before you defend him to
> > > the hilt, Dustbin is the worst of the
> > > worst.
> >
> > And all you seem to be able to do is post trash, since you don't seem to
> > have any technical skills at all
>
> Oh really, I don't have "any technical
> skills"... "at all". And yet it was me
> that posted the 'so called' 6 lines of
> Assembly code weren't Dustbin's code
> at all, how do you suppose I know that,
> ****face (with no skills n ****). Yet
> you continued to post your confused
> crap about these 6 lines of ASM, what,
> three times already?

Anyone can post snippets of any code from anywhere, there are tons of
examples on the net for you to use.

If you had any skill as a programmer you would already know that your
snippet means nothing without the rest of the code for proof.

> Do you have the slightest clue what
> those 6 lines do? Maybe you could
> save some face by Googling on it. Not
> that those 6 lines are anything to do
> with the packer signature.

Maybe you could prove you know something by contacting a programmer and
getting information on programming, since you don't appear to have a
clue.

> Does anyone in these groups think you
> are technically qualified to comment on
> code? Have you actually written any
> code? C'mon amaze us Liarthos, fork
> some of your technical skills, let's
> see your Assembly code.

I was coding "Machine Language" in hex before you were born son. Face
it, you've been caught again, with your pants down - you posted a
snippet of some code that proves you know something, but you can't prove
it, can't show how it means anything.

> > - If you've got the good on him then
> > post it, so far you've shown nothing.
> >
>
> I told you how the ****er is doing it
> using his old methods... He's probably
> got your box (or someone as stupid as
> you) setup as a bot farm right acting
> as a HHI relay station.

LOL - so, since you can't prove your case, since you don't have a clue,
you will resort to attacks. The attack when backed into a corner is an
old troll/liars method - face it, post the truth or you're a liar.


--

Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS 1.COM
that create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a
look at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.