US Teen (Author of Bug****) Arrested as 'Spybot Mastermind'

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

4Q wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>> 4Q wrote:
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> the bizarre spawn of the
>>>>> Pillsbury Doughboy's drunken indiscretions in elephant seal
>>>>> territory
>>>>
>>>> That was beautiful. I'm in awe.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oi! Now don't you and Laura start
>>> fighting over Son-of-Rod
>>
>> Oh brother.
>>
>> Will it be okay if we fight over you too? Mud wrestling, maybe?
>>
>
> Yes, that would be fine! I'll even
> soap you both down after the fight.
> ;]]

I knew we could count on you.

>> <walks away shaking head> Men, men, men.
>
> I'm working on that mud wrestling
> idea with my erotic art sketch pad ;]]

<collapses in a fit of giggles>

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rqa88F13khtkU1
@mid.individual.net:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rnk3nF151e5nU1
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>>> "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to
>>>> figure out that every computer on this lan looks like the same
>>>> machine as
>>>> far as the internet is concerned."
>>>>
>>>> Hey! Am I on your LAN too, Dustin?
>>>
>>> At the rate Dustin is going, the entire usenet community is on his
>>> LAN.
>>>
>>
>> I'm responding to this purely for the amusement value, my own that is.
>
> You're responding to this because you're obsessed.

I'm responding for my own entertainment, as I said.
I wouldn't call me obsessed, you've made far more posts lately than I have,
and usually they are about me.

>> I have 4 computers where I reside, every single one of them as far as
>> the internet is concerned is one computer. Outside my lan, the
>> internet doesn't know (or care) which computer is doing what. The
>> router handles everything.
>
> Which has nothing to do with anything.

Yes actually, it has alot to do with it. Your claiming that I specifically
made the post in alt.sex; I've maintained from the beginning that I did not
do so. I did provide the required information for the post to be made, but
I didn't actually make the post. A small difference to you I suppose, but
an important one to me.

>> So when I say another user on my LAN made the post Rhonda is whining
>> about, it's true. And it will come from the same IP as this machine's
>> post.
>
> You're responsible for the post.

I'm responsible to an extint, yes.

> It was information only you had, it was information that was posted
> using one of your accounts, using your IP address and your signature
> "typo," i.e., the incorrect form for "you're."

As I said previously, unless I was the only one who recieved emails from
you with your personal information as a signature, I'm not the only one who
had the information. I'm just the only one to leak it publically.

> You continue to deflect from this by trying to give meaning to the idea
> that someone else hit the send key. It doesn't matter who hit the send
> key.

Not to you it doesn't, obviously. To me, it does.

>> Now, the amusing part, atleast one of you (rhonda) can't grasp such a
>> simple concept...all 4 computers here (3 intel, one amd pos) appear
>> to be one computer as far as the internet is concerned, and they are
>> all using the same IP on the WAN side.
>
> See above, dumbass.

No, stupid, you see above. You originally claimed that I had made the post,
when in fact I hadn't. Since you obviously cannot dispute the LAN argument,
your changing tactics ever so slightly.

> Dustin, the issue is not so much that you posted my address and phone
> number to alt. sex, but that you continue to commit immature and

Obviously Rhonda it is, it's your whole obsession with me. You bring it up
almost every single time you post to me, or about me.

> outright unethical acts. Not only that, you seem to believe that you can
> be a self-appointed arbiter of what is right and wrong (e.g., your
> attack on Laura, with respect to something that had nothing to do with
> you, all in the name of personal gain), while going along and doing
> things that are flat out against the law.

I'm not an arbiter of anything Rhonda. Laura was doing something that
wasn't kosher with me and I called her on it, simple as that. Laura made
some claims that she would remove pictures if asked to do so, I brought
that issue specifically up after sugien initiated contact with me.

As far as unethical acts are concerned, That's primarily a different
viewpoint you and I have with regard to copyright laws; and it's a mute
point. I can find just as many people who agree with me as you can who
don't. It's a red herring. Your just going to have to find something better
to call me immature for doing. Copying music and movies just isn't going to
do. Most of the population now engages in such activities, hun.

> It doesn't wash. You're full of ****, and you have a lot of catching up
> to do before your mental age (teenage, that is) balances with your
> physical age.

I'm not full of **** anymore so than you know wtf your talking about when
it concerns computers, message headers or LANS. Your incurably stupid
Rhonda, I no longer have any doubt in my mind about it.

I do not do anything to hurt anyone (copyright viewpoints aside). I develop
an antimalware tool, and that's all. If that's unethical or the work of a
teenagers mind to you, I can live with it.

--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

[Dustin Cook]

"Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
news:reWdncCw7aQbT8TanZ2dnUVZ_o-mnZ2d@adelphia.com:

> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5rrpd3F168cfrU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Sugien wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> <big snip cause no one gives a ****>
> When a person grows up fat/ugly/different from the norm, it does
> most
> always have a *profound* impact on their character. For some it makes
> them stronger, for others it scars them for life. It isn't right; but
> it is a fact of life that those in the so called "IN" group or normal
> according to society teas/taunt/make fun of/and even physically attack
> those that are not. If you choose to not believe this *fact* you can
> then continue going through life with your blinders on. It takes.

Sugien, i really think she knows this. I suspect she's just trolling you.


She's been trolling me for awhile now.


--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:reWdncCw7aQbT8TanZ2dnUVZ_o-mnZ2d@adelphia.com:
>
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5rrpd3F168cfrU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Sugien wrote:
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> <big snip cause no one gives a ****>
>> When a person grows up fat/ugly/different from the norm, it does
>> most
>> always have a *profound* impact on their character. For some it
>> makes them stronger, for others it scars them for life. It isn't
>> right; but it is a fact of life that those in the so called "IN"
>> group or normal according to society teas/taunt/make fun of/and even
>> physically attack those that are not. If you choose to not believe
>> this *fact* you can then continue going through life with your
>> blinders on. It takes.
>
> Sugien, i really think she knows this.

I don't agree with it except to the extent it is--like everything else
about us as individuals--a factor in how we develop our relationship
with the world.

> I suspect she's just trolling you.

Paranoid much, Dustin?

> She's been trolling me for awhile now.

You trolled yourself. You convinced yourself that I was going to
share/post your emails to me, and you went berserk. I never wrote
anything to indicate that such a thought had ever entered my
mind...because it hadn't. But you were being flamed, and even though I
wasn't flaming you, I was friends with those who were, so in your mind,
I somehow had something to do with it.

Once and for all, Dustin, it was all in your head. The only involvement
I had up to the point that you started with all the "retaliation" for
things I had not done was to try--in email and even in a post or two--to
get some of them to ease up on you.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rqa88F13khtkU1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:5rnk3nF151e5nU1 @mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> BoaterDave wrote:
>>>>> "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to
>>>>> figure out that every computer on this lan looks like the same
>>>>> machine as
>>>>> far as the internet is concerned."
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey! Am I on your LAN too, Dustin?
>>>>
>>>> At the rate Dustin is going, the entire usenet community is on his
>>>> LAN.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm responding to this purely for the amusement value, my own that
>>> is.
>>
>> You're responding to this because you're obsessed.
>
> I'm responding for my own entertainment, as I said.

Right.

> I wouldn't call me obsessed, you've made far more posts lately than I
> have, and usually they are about me.

Really?

Are you also one of those ****heads who goes through the express line
with a full cart because he apparently can neither read nor count?

>>> I have 4 computers where I reside, every single one of them as far
>>> as the internet is concerned is one computer. Outside my lan, the
>>> internet doesn't know (or care) which computer is doing what. The
>>> router handles everything.
>>
>> Which has nothing to do with anything.
>
> Yes actually, it has alot to do with it. Your claiming that I
> specifically made the post in alt.sex; I've maintained from the
> beginning that I did not do so. I did provide the required
> information for the post to be made, but I didn't actually make the
> post. A small difference to you I suppose, but an important one to
> me.

Dustin, the mechanism by which the post arrived at every server that
carries alt.sex is irrelevant. No matter how it got there, you are
responsible for it.

You had the information, it came from your account and from your IP
address. We have all seen you blame your friends and even your own
mother for posts you do not wish to own.

It's laughable.

>>> So when I say another user on my LAN made the post Rhonda is whining
>>> about, it's true. And it will come from the same IP as this
>>> machine's post.
>>
>> You're responsible for the post.
>
> I'm responsible to an extint, yes.

Totally responsible.

>> It was information only you had, it was information that was posted
>> using one of your accounts, using your IP address and your signature
>> "typo," i.e., the incorrect form for "you're."
>
> As I said previously, unless I was the only one who recieved emails
> from you with your personal information as a signature, I'm not the
> only one who had the information. I'm just the only one to leak it
> publically.

I'm glad you've finally admitted to it.

>> You continue to deflect from this by trying to give meaning to the
>> idea that someone else hit the send key. It doesn't matter who hit
>> the send key.
>
> Not to you it doesn't, obviously. To me, it does.

<shakes head>

>>> Now, the amusing part, atleast one of you (rhonda) can't grasp such
>>> a simple concept...all 4 computers here (3 intel, one amd pos)
>>> appear to be one computer as far as the internet is concerned, and
>>> they are all using the same IP on the WAN side.
>>
>> See above, dumbass.
>
> No, stupid, you see above. You originally claimed that I had made the
> post, when in fact I hadn't. Since you obviously cannot dispute the
> LAN argument, your changing tactics ever so slightly.

My tactics have never changed. And I still believe you made the post.

The point is that whether or not you made the post, you are responsible
for the post either way.

>> Dustin, the issue is not so much that you posted my address and phone
>> number to alt. sex, but that you continue to commit immature and
>
> Obviously Rhonda it is, it's your whole obsession with me. You bring
> it up almost every single time you post to me, or about me.

What I'm bringing up is an illustration of your character--or rather,
the lack thereof.

Your attack on Laura is another.

There's one set of rules, Dustin, and you don't get to lambaste someone
else for not following rules you yourself don't follow. I realize you
don't get that, which is common in Borderline Personalities, but it's
still true.

>> outright unethical acts. Not only that, you seem to believe that you
>> can be a self-appointed arbiter of what is right and wrong (e.g.,
>> your attack on Laura, with respect to something that had nothing to
>> do with you, all in the name of personal gain), while going along
>> and doing things that are flat out against the law.
>
> I'm not an arbiter of anything Rhonda. Laura was doing something that
> wasn't kosher with me and I called her on it, simple as that. Laura
> made some claims that she would remove pictures if asked to do so, I
> brought that issue specifically up after sugien initiated contact
> with me.

You were sucking up to Sugien as a means to secure a place for yourself
in ahm. I also saw you sucking up to Hatter, as well as one or two
others. I find your behavior hilarious, except when you start attacking
others for things you yourself do.

> As far as unethical acts are concerned, That's primarily a different
> viewpoint you and I have with regard to copyright laws; and it's a
> mute point.

Then why did you attack Laura on the basis of violating Sugien's
copyright?

> I can find just as many people who agree with me as you
> can who don't. It's a red herring. Your just going to have to find
> something better to call me immature for doing. Copying music and
> movies just isn't going to do. Most of the population now engages in
> such activities, hun.

Most of the population speeds, and when it gets caught, it gets a
ticket.

Just because a lot of people (not "most," btw, as to your example) do
something doesn't make it okay.

>> It doesn't wash. You're full of ****, and you have a lot of catching
>> up to do before your mental age (teenage, that is) balances with your
>> physical age.
>
> I'm not full of **** anymore so than you know wtf your talking about
> when it concerns computers, message headers or LANS. Your incurably
> stupid Rhonda, I no longer have any doubt in my mind about it.

Your list of wrong ideas is so long at this point, it matters not,
Dustin.

> I do not do anything to hurt anyone (copyright viewpoints aside). I
> develop an antimalware tool, and that's all. If that's unethical or
> the work of a teenagers mind to you, I can live with it.

Good. Then stopy replying.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[4Q]

Dustbin Cook wrote:
> Daito <Daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote in news:20071209090548
> @daito.wickedsamurai.com:
>
> > On 2007-12-09, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>> "Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>> news:LZqdnTqU6IFVVcTanZ2dnUVZ_sKqnZ2d@adelphia.com :
> >>>
> >>>> "Daito" <Daito@NOSPAMwickedsamurai.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:20071207051925@daito.wickedsamurai.com...
> >>>>> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.hackers.malicious.]
> >>>>> On 2007-12-07, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
> >>>>> <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
> >>>>>> Sugien wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In my experience and over my lifetime I have found that fat and
> or
> >>>>>>> ugly people (men and women) tend to be more of a *real* person; I
> >>>>>>> guess
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But your experience is from the POV of an ugly deadbeat who
> >>>>>> measures ***** by the raw tonnage. If you were a festering leper
> >>>>>> shacking up with a corpse you'd be telling us rotting flesh was a
> >>>>>> sign of character too.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is mostly because men as a group don't care what other men
> >>>>>>> look like and as such they won't tease other men near as much
> >>>>>>> that are ugly and or fat as compared to what women will with
> other
> >>>>>>> women.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not being a real one, I suppose your misconceptions about men is
> >>>>>> only natural...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Well if you went out and got a job to help support your kid, maybe
> >>>>> then people would consider you a "real" man and you wouldn't have
> to
> >>>>> "suppose" so much, remailing ****stain.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HTH
> >>>>
> >>>> I hope you were replying to this thing **Cyberiade.it Anonymous
> >>>> Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it>** and not myself; but
> >>>> knowing you for years I think it was not indented for me I left
> >>>> off reading it's posts after it showed it's self to be what it is.
> >>>> It's a coward hiding behind remailers, sort of like a punk standing
> >>>> outside the bear cage poking at the bear through the bars with a
> >>>> stick. I have my reader set to ignore their posts.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Have you noticed that Rhonda isn't having as much fun now Sugien? She
> >>> actually thought Evul would be really pissed at me for that log
> >>> snippit. She's had several posts between herself and Evul, and yet,
> >>> for some silly reason; hasn't figured it out yet. How stupid do you
> >>> suppose she really is?
> >>
> >> Do you know what a non sequitur is, Dustin?
> >>
> > Someone who doesn't sequit. I am no sequitter. Well..I did stop smoking
> > cigs a while back.
>
> I quit and started back... *shrug*.
>

Yes you are a very weak minded
individual. Failure is your modus
operandi, we expected this from you.

What hope do we have you'll succeed
in any future projects, Hmmm? You can't
even hold down a job in a repair shop,
sweeping up or taking the back off old
alarm clock radios.


4Q

[catapulting the propaganda]

On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:45:13 +0000, Dustin Cook wrote:


> I don't quiet understand why you want to debate one's choice in tools
> anyway. It's as boring as the pascal vs c


c is **** gone hard.

pascal? better and easier than c.

> fights done long ago on

yeah but they are gone, c and pascal are still here, people can still
complain about c if they want ok?

> fidonet. It wasn't useful then either,

oh but it is, just don't waste your time on c unless you are some kind of
genius.

> People will write in whatever
> languages they please.

CORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But don't tell me what I cann or cannot talk (or complain about).

> It's the end result that matters to the masses,
> not whether or not it's pure assembler.
>
>
>
>
>> I say throw the ****er in jail!

yeah **** c.