"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:fivoj9$7pj$1
@news.datemas.de:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rglf7F14h8tqU2
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:5rfuueF14e1ebU1 @mid.individual.net:
>>>>
>>>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>>>> 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:c3452a3b-d552-4264-8fd8-
>>>>>> 5a957cee4c96@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's right, you can't attack BugHunter anymore without looking
>>>>>> like a total and complete ****ing idiot,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you get yet that there are people who sincerely believe that
>>>>> those who use your program are being set up to take a fall? You're
>>>>> engaging
>>>>
>>>> Sure. People sincerely believed the earth was flat and they'd fall
>>>> off of it too. It seems to be taking an awfully long time for this
>>>> setup to take place tho. going on.. 3 years now. You do realize,
>>>> the more you badmouth the program, the more curiosity you bring to
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>>> What kind of person posts a woman's information to alt.sex the way
>>>>> you did? What kind of character does it show, Dustin, but one that
>>>>> is deviant?
>>>>
>>>> I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>>>> made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>>>> cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>>>> Acceptable terms?
>>>
>>> No, Dustin.
>>
>> Yes, Rhonda.
>
> I'm afraid you don't decide what is or is not acceptable to me.
>
> Too bad for you.

Can't blame me for trying.

>>> It was made from your account, using information that none of your
>>> associates could have possessed unless you gave it to them.
>>
>> And yet, *I* didn't make the post. Do you understand that yet?
>
> I don't believe you. Why don't you take a poll and see if anyone

I don't care. Your incurably stupid, I accept this. I'm willing to move
on.
>> The only idiot here is you, Rhonda. It doesn't take a rocket
>> scientist to figure out that every computer on this lan looks like
>> the same machine as far as the internet is concerned.
>
> Dustin, no one is buying it.

Good thing, I'm not selling anything.

>>> What part of the "concept" that "no one had that address but you, so
>>> trying to pass it off on someone else won't work" don't you
>>> understand?
>>
>> I'm not so sure I believe you, considering it was your email
>> signature. Which is attached to all outgoing emails. Are you telling
>> me i was the only one you emailed during that time, Rhonda?
>
> I certainly didn't email anyone who would be using your email address
> and LAN, Dustin. Except you, of course.

Poor spin, especially from you. The question was simple. Was I the only
person you were in email contact with when your personal information was
a signature on your outgoing emails? (We call that a business card here
you know.)

Your the first person to consider the information offered freely to be
private and somehow confidential in this respect. Yes, the alt.sex post
was in very poor taste; yes I do hold some responsibility for it
existing. I have already apologized for my participation in the creation
of the post to no avail. As far as I'm concerned, it's now a closed
matter.




--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt