US Teen (Author of Bug****) Arrested as 'Spybot Mastermind'

[Laura Fredericks]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
<bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in post to Rhonda:
>I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>Acceptable terms?

Lots of times at work I've written a message in Outlook for an
associate, saved it as a *.msg file, given him the file on a floppy
and he's sent it from his e-mail account. Though I was the one who
actually *authored* the message, I didn't *send* it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBR1M6vaRseRzHUwOaEQKLHACdHRgRMfX7jEfpiwFM8OMvky 3ZFbQAoLyo
wAdIdn3KqNxB6Fj9fq+C7D21
=9pz2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Laura Fredericks
4Q's "wicked evil ***** of satire, parody, humor and trollism"

PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A

usenet flamewars:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/usenet/

Remove CLOTHES to reply.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

kurt wismer wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rd4ntF1472pkU1
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
> [snip]
>>>> I don't quiet understand why you want to debate
>>> You don't understand it's not a debate.
>>
>> *yawn* Substance, can you produce any substance?
>
> well, for once she produced truth, does that count?

For once?

I think I have more than once to my credit, o stingy one.

> it's not a debate... none of it is a debate, it's all just trolling
> and you keep falling for it... rhonda is a troll,

<sigh>

> 4q aka pzest aka
> paul zest is a troll (surprised you didn't pull out the nick pzest
> when evul asked who 4q was), and a few other people i could name are
> trolls...
> you clearly aren't going to go away as some trolling victims do,

No, because he seeks out trouble, and he trolls himself.

You'll recall he made the alt.sex post and did all the other things he
did because he convinced himself--without threat or other
provocation--that I was going to post his emails.

Funny thing, I still haven't posted his emails.

> so
> they latch on to you

You have it backwards. The remora here is Dustin. By the way, did you
know that the primary diet for some species of remora is feces of their
host?

Echeneis Dustbinis has a nice ring, don't you think?

> as a persistent source of 'nourishment' (don't
> feed the trolls)... and that is the answer to the question of
> "why?"... why they start **** with you

Again, backwards. He goes looking for ****.

> is because you give them the
> response they crave, you bring it on yourself by not ignoring them...

He brings it on himself by seeking it out.

> as long as you keep feeding them they'll keep coming around looking
> for more...

As long as he keeps looking for more, he'll keep being fed. It's human
nature.

> you need to learn to rise above attacks against your ego... reaction
> is proof of a vulnerable spot... "if neither foes nor loving friends
> can hurt you" (http://www.swarthmore.edu/~apreset1/docs/if.html)...

Ain't that the truth.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[4Q]

Laura Fredericks wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in post to Rhonda:
> >I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
> >made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
> >cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
> >Acceptable terms?
>
> Lots of times at work I've written a message in Outlook for an
> associate, saved it as a *.msg file, given him the file on a floppy
> and he's sent it from his e-mail account. Though I was the one who
> actually *authored* the message, I didn't *send* it.
>

Good point Laura, do you mean Dustbin
didn't invent some bull**** story about
having a kids tea party in his moms
basement and charging everyone $300 for
pretending they was he? C'mon!!! I was
starting to believe Dustbin had invited
a load of his immature basement dwellers
around to dance about like supersized
condoms.

http://fourq.host.sk/INFO/Nirodh_Cook/ <-- Dustbin the dancing Condom


4Q

[Sugien]

"Laura Fredericks" <anonomiss@CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6id6l3lgkia50qu3ov55v4bsreg9vseql1@4ax.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in post to Rhonda:
>>I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>>made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>>cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>>Acceptable terms?
>
> Lots of times at work I've written a message in Outlook for an

Work? I thought them made a person retire when they reached or exceded 67?
Oh that is right, you can continue working while you draw your Social
Security check; but after age 67, they don't deduct your salary from your
Social Security check.

Don't get your bloomers in a twist, all in good fun right or at least
that's when you tell me when trying to use a zinger in my direction. lol


--
From the Desk of Sugien CSK
/}
@###{ ]::::::Cyber Striker Knight::::::>
\}

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Sugien wrote:
> "Laura Fredericks" <anonomiss@CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6id6l3lgkia50qu3ov55v4bsreg9vseql1@4ax.com...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
>> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in post to Rhonda:
>>> I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>>> made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>>> cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>>> Acceptable terms?
>>
>> Lots of times at work I've written a message in Outlook for an
>
> Work? I thought them made a person retire when they reached or
> exceded 67? Oh that is right, you can continue working while you draw
> your Social Security check; but after age 67, they don't deduct your
> salary from your Social Security check.
>
> Don't get your bloomers in a twist, all in good fun right or at
> least that's when you tell me when trying to use a zinger in my
> direction. lol

But Sugien, her zingers are zingers.

This was just...a teeney, tiny, itty-bitty, tad...um...<looks for a kind
word>...flat. Yeah, that's it. Flat.

I would never call you lame. Not me.



P.S. How old are you? I'm betting you're older than Laura.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[Laura Fredericks]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:12:26 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
<rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in post to Dimbulb.
>P.S. How old are you? I'm betting you're older than Laura.

He is. ;-)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBR1NhS6RseRzHUwOaEQLCugCg/jNTtajYz97Kwzi6Db9kiFThNnUAoIzo
0EGarrYfFmXiA63AmIPfAmku
=7gLe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Laura Fredericks
4Q's "wicked evil ***** of satire, parody, humor and trollism"

PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A

usenet flamewars:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/usenet/

Remove CLOTHES to reply.

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rglf7F14h8tqU1
@mid.individual.net:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rft4hF1488r0U1
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> And does evul know you posted that chat?
>>
>> Yes, in fact he does.
>
> I'm not sure I believe you, Dustin.

You could always take Daito up on the invite and ask him yourself on irc.
You don't have to believe me, I don't have any reason to lie about it. He's
aware of the fact I posted a section of the logfile to usenet, Yes.

> But please be sure to let him know that Don Clark was an innocent
> bystander who had absolutely nothing to do with usenet.

He reads usenet.

--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

[Dustin Cook]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rglf7F14h8tqU2
@mid.individual.net:

> Dustin Cook wrote:
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rfuueF14e1ebU1
>> @mid.individual.net:
>>
>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>> 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:c3452a3b-d552-4264-8fd8-
>>>> 5a957cee4c96@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> That's right, you can't attack BugHunter anymore without looking
>>>> like a total and complete ****ing idiot,
>>>
>>> Do you get yet that there are people who sincerely believe that those
>>> who use your program are being set up to take a fall? You're engaging
>>
>> Sure. People sincerely believed the earth was flat and they'd fall
>> off of it too. It seems to be taking an awfully long time for this
>> setup to take place tho. going on.. 3 years now. You do realize,
>> the more you badmouth the program, the more curiosity you bring to it.
>>
>>> What kind of person posts a woman's information to alt.sex the way
>>> you did? What kind of character does it show, Dustin, but one that is
>>> deviant?
>>
>> I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>> made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>> cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>> Acceptable terms?
>
> No, Dustin.

Yes, Rhonda.

> It was made from your account, using information that none of your
> associates could have possessed unless you gave it to them.

And yet, *I* didn't make the post. Do you understand that yet?

>> FYI, slight hint regarding your evidence of my previous nick. It was
>> Gremlin, not "The Gremlin". I don't expect you to see the humour in
>> that, as you don't seem to understand the concept of LAN. Ask your
>> new best friend 4Q to explain it to you, obviously k**** couldn't
>> teach you.
>
> I love it. "The concept of a LAN." You ****ing idiot.

The only idiot here is you, Rhonda. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to
figure out that every computer on this lan looks like the same machine as
far as the internet is concerned.

> What part of the "concept" that "no one had that address but you, so
> trying to pass it off on someone else won't work" don't you understand?

I'm not so sure I believe you, considering it was your email signature.
Which is attached to all outgoing emails. Are you telling me i was the
only one you emailed during that time, Rhonda?





--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

[Dustin Cook]

Laura Fredericks <anonomiss@CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote in
news:6id6l3lgkia50qu3ov55v4bsreg9vseql1@4ax.com:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:00:36 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in post to Rhonda:
>>I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>>made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>>cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>>Acceptable terms?
>
> Lots of times at work I've written a message in Outlook for an
> associate, saved it as a *.msg file, given him the file on a floppy
> and he's sent it from his e-mail account. Though I was the one who
> actually *authored* the message, I didn't *send* it.

Your story is similar, I didn't author anything, I just sent the
information via IM to another user on the LAN one day. That individual
used the information and made the post. Rhonda doesn't really like those
boring details.

Rhonda also seems to have a hard time understanding why I would consider
the information to be public knowledge; It was the outgoing signature in
her emails for sometime.


--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

[Laura Fredericks]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 18:57:05 -0500, "Sugien" <paulbryantsr@gmail.com>
wrote in post:
>Work? I thought them made a person retire when they reached or
>exceded 67? Oh that is right, you can continue working while you
>draw your Social Security check; but after age 67, they don't
>deduct your salary from your Social Security check.

LMAO! You know I'm younger than you, Dimbulb. And about 1/4 the size
of your *snicker* Mae West-lookalike of a wife.

http://a813.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...f0dc18c6615e4c
5aabade9624ac.jpg
or... http://************/1ujaw
(Mrs. Dimbulb is on the right in the blue tent, uh, dress. This must
be what Elvis meant when he sang, "Hunka hunka burning love".)

Hey, Rhonda! Don't you think it's hilarious that someone who can't
hold a job because of a (supposed) medical disability (Mad Cow
Disease; Dimbulb used to work "separating infected cows") would make
the above statement?

P.S. Hi, Kurt.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBR1Nk7qRseRzHUwOaEQKF7gCgoBag14Rna1wlSFlEiZTAPn VK/HwAoI0q
Tp9O6gcGhlQPAq3EQXPGtB5Y
=Qu6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Laura Fredericks
4Q's "wicked evil ***** of satire, parody, humor and trollism"

PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A

usenet flamewars:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/usenet/

Remove CLOTHES to reply.