US Teen (Author of Bug****) Arrested as 'Spybot Mastermind'

[4Q]

Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:fisvbs$kgr$1
> @news.datemas.de:
>
> > Daito wrote:
> >> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.hackers.malicious.]
> >> On 2007-12-01, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snipped>
> >
> >> I don't think evul reads ahm much anymore. You should just hop on
> >> exilenet and have real time flamewars with raid.
> >
> > If it were possible to have a real flamewar with Dustin, it would be
> > worth it, but watching him wobble like a Weeble when he tries to spin
> > the facts makes me dizzy. Had it not been for his unprovoked attack on
>
> Spin what facts? usenet previous posts (some anyway) are available for
> everyone to read.
>
>
> > Laura Fredericks, I'd not have had much, if anything, to say to him
> > again.
>
> The attack wasn't unprovoked. And it's resolved, and was resolved without
> you having anything to do with it.
>
> > For me, the real draw in all this is reading 4Q's hilarious parodies.
>
> > Dustin is just a sideshow, if that.
>
> And yet, you find it necessary to hijack any thread I might post in.
> How many times in the past week now have you mentioned the alt.sex post?
>

If anything it's quite appropriate to
keep mentioning your malicious sexual
deviance in a group 'AHM' that tracks
down sexual deviants. A bit of
background on how you play fire,
aligning yourself with potential
sexual predators might be useful to
AHMers so they don't find themselves
in a bit of a contraction (morality
wise).

I wonder if they found it interesting
that you tried to buy Rhonda off with
your $300 hush money?



4Q
p.s. Rhonda check your email.

[4Q]

4Q wrote:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:fisvbs$kgr$1
> > @news.datemas.de:
> >
> > > Daito wrote:
> > >> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.hackers.malicious.]
> > >> On 2007-12-01, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snipped>
> > >
> > >> I don't think evul reads ahm much anymore. You should just hop on
> > >> exilenet and have real time flamewars with raid.
> > >
> > > If it were possible to have a real flamewar with Dustin, it would be
> > > worth it, but watching him wobble like a Weeble when he tries to spin
> > > the facts makes me dizzy. Had it not been for his unprovoked attack on
> >
> > Spin what facts? usenet previous posts (some anyway) are available for
> > everyone to read.
> >
> >
> > > Laura Fredericks, I'd not have had much, if anything, to say to him
> > > again.
> >
> > The attack wasn't unprovoked. And it's resolved, and was resolved without
> > you having anything to do with it.
> >
> > > For me, the real draw in all this is reading 4Q's hilarious parodies.
> >
> > > Dustin is just a sideshow, if that.
> >
> > And yet, you find it necessary to hijack any thread I might post in.
> > How many times in the past week now have you mentioned the alt.sex post?
> >
>
> If anything it's quite appropriate to
> keep mentioning your malicious sexual
> deviance in a group 'AHM' that tracks
> down sexual deviants. A bit of
> background on how you play fire,
> aligning yourself with potential
> sexual predators might be useful to
> AHMers so they don't find themselves
> in a bit of a contraction (morality
> wise).

*contradiction

>
> I wonder if they found it interesting
> that you tried to buy Rhonda off with
> your $300 hush money?
>
>
>
> 4Q
> p.s. Rhonda check your email.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

4Q wrote:
> 4Q wrote:
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:fisvbs$kgr$1
>>> @news.datemas.de:
>>>
>>>> Daito wrote:
>>>>> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.hackers.malicious.]
>>>>> On 2007-12-01, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>>> I don't think evul reads ahm much anymore. You should just hop on
>>>>> exilenet and have real time flamewars with raid.
>>>>
>>>> If it were possible to have a real flamewar with Dustin, it would
>>>> be worth it, but watching him wobble like a Weeble when he tries
>>>> to spin the facts makes me dizzy. Had it not been for his
>>>> unprovoked attack on
>>>
>>> Spin what facts? usenet previous posts (some anyway) are available
>>> for everyone to read.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Laura Fredericks, I'd not have had much, if anything, to say to him
>>>> again.
>>>
>>> The attack wasn't unprovoked. And it's resolved, and was resolved
>>> without you having anything to do with it.
>>>
>>>> For me, the real draw in all this is reading 4Q's hilarious
>>>> parodies.
>>>
>>>> Dustin is just a sideshow, if that.
>>>
>>> And yet, you find it necessary to hijack any thread I might post in.
>>> How many times in the past week now have you mentioned the alt.sex
>>> post?
>>>
>>
>> If anything it's quite appropriate to
>> keep mentioning your malicious sexual
>> deviance in a group 'AHM' that tracks
>> down sexual deviants. A bit of
>> background on how you play fire,
>> aligning yourself with potential
>> sexual predators might be useful to
>> AHMers so they don't find themselves
>> in a bit of a contraction (morality
>> wise).
>
> *contradiction
>

No one likes outer filth, and Dustin compounded his sin by exposing my
family and me to danger from sexual opportunists. It's too bad he still
doesn't comprehend the gravity of what he did.

I wonder if he will ever understand that if one of the women in my
household had been sexually assaulted as a result, he would've been held
criminally liable?

>> I wonder if they found it interesting
>> that you tried to buy Rhonda off with
>> your $300 hush money?
>>

That was the most amazing part of the whole thing, I think.
Unfortunately, he feels that because the FBI failed to show up at his
door, he can continue to do as he was doing. He doesn't quite understand
that he builds a case against himself with each new post.

>>
>> 4Q
>> p.s. Rhonda check your email.

Tag. You're it.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[4Q]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> 4Q wrote:
> > 4Q wrote:
> >> Dustin Cook wrote:
> >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:fisvbs$kgr$1
> >>> @news.datemas.de:
> >>>
> >>>> Daito wrote:
> >>>>> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.hackers.malicious.]
> >>>>> On 2007-12-01, Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> <snipped>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't think evul reads ahm much anymore. You should just hop on
> >>>>> exilenet and have real time flamewars with raid.
> >>>>
> >>>> If it were possible to have a real flamewar with Dustin, it would
> >>>> be worth it, but watching him wobble like a Weeble when he tries
> >>>> to spin the facts makes me dizzy. Had it not been for his
> >>>> unprovoked attack on
> >>>
> >>> Spin what facts? usenet previous posts (some anyway) are available
> >>> for everyone to read.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Laura Fredericks, I'd not have had much, if anything, to say to him
> >>>> again.
> >>>
> >>> The attack wasn't unprovoked. And it's resolved, and was resolved
> >>> without you having anything to do with it.
> >>>
> >>>> For me, the real draw in all this is reading 4Q's hilarious
> >>>> parodies.
> >>>
> >>>> Dustin is just a sideshow, if that.
> >>>
> >>> And yet, you find it necessary to hijack any thread I might post in.
> >>> How many times in the past week now have you mentioned the alt.sex
> >>> post?
> >>>
> >>
> >> If anything it's quite appropriate to
> >> keep mentioning your malicious sexual
> >> deviance in a group 'AHM' that tracks
> >> down sexual deviants. A bit of
> >> background on how you play fire,
> >> aligning yourself with potential
> >> sexual predators might be useful to
> >> AHMers so they don't find themselves
> >> in a bit of a contraction (morality
> >> wise).
> >
> > *contradiction
> >
>
> No one likes outer filth, and Dustin compounded his sin by exposing my
> family and me to danger from sexual opportunists. It's too bad he still
> doesn't comprehend the gravity of what he did.
>
> I wonder if he will ever understand that if one of the women in my
> household had been sexually assaulted as a result, he would've been held
> criminally liable?
>
> >> I wonder if they found it interesting
> >> that you tried to buy Rhonda off with
> >> your $300 hush money?
> >>
>
> That was the most amazing part of the whole thing, I think.
> Unfortunately, he feels that because the FBI failed to show up at his
> door, he can continue to do as he was doing. He doesn't quite understand
> that he builds a case against himself with each new post.
>
> >>
> >> 4Q
> >> p.s. Rhonda check your email.
>
> Tag. You're it.
>

Tag you back

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

4Q wrote:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>> 4Q wrote:

>>>> p.s. Rhonda check your email.
>>
>> Tag. You're it.
>>
>
> Tag you back

But you're still "it."

rl