Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5rglf7F14h8tqU2
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:5rfuueF14e1ebU1 @mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> Dustin Cook wrote:
>>>>> 4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:c3452a3b-d552-4264-8fd8-
>>>>> 5a957cee4c96@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right, you can't attack BugHunter anymore without looking
>>>>> like a total and complete ****ing idiot,
>>>>
>>>> Do you get yet that there are people who sincerely believe that
>>>> those who use your program are being set up to take a fall? You're
>>>> engaging
>>>
>>> Sure. People sincerely believed the earth was flat and they'd fall
>>> off of it too. It seems to be taking an awfully long time for this
>>> setup to take place tho. going on.. 3 years now. You do realize,
>>> the more you badmouth the program, the more curiosity you bring to
>>> it.
>>>
>>>> What kind of person posts a woman's information to alt.sex the way
>>>> you did? What kind of character does it show, Dustin, but one that
>>>> is deviant?
>>>
>>> I tell you what Rhonda, since this is beyond old. You *prove* *I*
>>> made the post, and I'll apologize for it. On the other hand, if you
>>> cannot prove *I* made the post, you'll quit bringing it up?
>>> Acceptable terms?
>>
>> No, Dustin.
>
> Yes, Rhonda.

I'm afraid you don't decide what is or is not acceptable to me.

Too bad for you.

>> It was made from your account, using information that none of your
>> associates could have possessed unless you gave it to them.
>
> And yet, *I* didn't make the post. Do you understand that yet?

I don't believe you. Why don't you take a poll and see if anyone
believes that a post that came from your email address, your IP address,
containing your standard misuse of the word "your" wasn't a post made by
you.

Do you think everyone is as stupid as you, Dustin?

>>> FYI, slight hint regarding your evidence of my previous nick. It was
>>> Gremlin, not "The Gremlin". I don't expect you to see the humour in
>>> that, as you don't seem to understand the concept of LAN. Ask your
>>> new best friend 4Q to explain it to you, obviously k**** couldn't
>>> teach you.
>>
>> I love it. "The concept of a LAN." You ****ing idiot.
>
> The only idiot here is you, Rhonda. It doesn't take a rocket
> scientist to figure out that every computer on this lan looks like
> the same machine as far as the internet is concerned.

Dustin, no one is buying it.

>> What part of the "concept" that "no one had that address but you, so
>> trying to pass it off on someone else won't work" don't you
>> understand?
>
> I'm not so sure I believe you, considering it was your email
> signature. Which is attached to all outgoing emails. Are you telling
> me i was the only one you emailed during that time, Rhonda?

I certainly didn't email anyone who would be using your email address
and LAN, Dustin. Except you, of course.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@databasix.com

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle