4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in news:b0550f52-d55b-4503-8b48-
00fd43e1af57@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:


> and especially **** written in b'ASIC
> (described as a lamer tool for people
> that can't code in Assembly)

As for assembler, we all know better than that. As far as ASIC is
concerned, this is really a pointless arguement. It's simply a tool for
doing some things in. I quit writing malware almost 8 years ago 4Q, do
you honestly think in all that time I haven't learned assembler? Don't
kid yourself. I have spent nearly 3 years developing a DOS (basically,
doesn't require windows to be operational for scanning/disabling/removal
purposes) based malware removal tool that currently scans for over 11,000
malicious bhos, trojans, keyloggers, etc... The fact I'm able to write
such a tool certainly proves I do know assembler.

I don't quiet understand why you want to debate one's choice in tools
anyway. It's as boring as the pascal vs c fights done long ago on
fidonet. It wasn't useful then either, People will write in whatever
languages they please. It's the end result that matters to the masses,
not whether or not it's pure assembler.




> I say throw the ****er in jail!



--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt