Re: Does a decent anonymous IP address method exist for a windows xp simpleton?

[Anonymous]

phreewarephan@nospamxxx.net wrote:

> Joan Battaglia <joanmaxwell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> news:8jUTi.433$yV6.228@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net:
>
> > I'm not real good with windows xp but I would like to find freeware to
> > post news, send mail,
>
> Not that I'm recommending it, but has anyone here ever reviewed or
> installed Sympa from erightsoft.com?
>
>
>
> http://www.erightsoft.com/sympa.html
>
> SYMPA (Send_Your_Mail_Privately_&_Anonymously)
> A multi-function FreeWare to be used ONLY for the following
> educational / training purposes:
>
>
> o Send totally Anonymous E-Mails. (Through Tunnel Proxy)

<snip>

The only thing this is totally, is snake oil. It's a simple one-hop
proxy that allows you to diddle mail/SMTP headers. Nothing anonymous
about it at all.

Any one-hop that spouts the "totally anonymous" line of crap can be
summarily dismissed. They're lying right up front, so there's no reason
to trust that anything else they say is true.

[Ari]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:17:29 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous wrote:

>> http://www.erightsoft.com/sympa.html
>>
>> SYMPA (Send_Your_Mail_Privately_&_Anonymously)
>> A multi-function FreeWare to be used ONLY for the following
>> educational / training purposes:
>>
>> o Send totally Anonymous E-Mails. (Through Tunnel Proxy)
>
> <snip>
>
> The only thing this is totally, is snake oil. It's a simple one-hop
> proxy that allows you to diddle mail/SMTP headers. Nothing anonymous
> about it at all.
>
> Any one-hop that spouts the "totally anonymous" line of crap can be
> summarily dismissed. They're lying right up front, so there's no reason
> to trust that anything else they say is true.

Now who does that sound like, lemme think...

Privacy li(e)!
--
"You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself"
Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust"
http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/