"VanguardLH" <VanguardLH@mail.invalid> wrote:

> Yeah, the "trust" in SSL, per your comments and others, is NOT to
> trust them. Instead the user has to go investigate. Yep, wonderful
> trust model there.

You have to investigate errors and warnings in *ANY* trust model.
That's how trust is established. It's what a trust model *IS* you
ignorant SOB.

<SHEESH!>

>