VanguardLH wrote:

>A bit odd that NATO would waste their time describing MITM for SSL
>interception
>(http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubF...IST-041-19.pdf)
>if, according to you, it were impossible.

I don't know whether to laugh at or feel sorry for all these clueless
n00bs trying to assume there way out of being wrong. They're easy
targets for anyone who wants to exploit their ignorance.