"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in news:5nfplrFi3v3oU1
@mid.individual.net:

> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Does the name PA Bear sound familiar? he pissed me off, his actions
>> was the cost of your job. He tried to use his status as an MVP to
>> ruin me, and my job and in the long run all he did was costs others
>> theirs and really pissed off Chris Butts. I saw all his emails. This
>> goes way beyond you. He thought I was some smuck loser with too much
>> time on my hands. You can rest assured he won't mess with me again or
>> NASA.
>
> I do not want what I am about to write to be misconstrued, so I am
going
> to separate out the three issues as carefully as I can.
>
> The first issue is that I firmly believe anyone has the *right* to say
> any goddammed annoying, obnoxious, offensive thing that person feels
> like saying, regardless of how goddammed annoying, obnoxious and
> offensive that person and his words might happen to be. Even a
> sociopath--that means you, Chris--is entitled to a voice.
>
> If you take away the right of anyone to speak, you have endangered the
> right of everyone to speak. It's that simple.
>
> For most of my adult life, David Goldberger has been my hero, because
he
> understood and honored this concept even when it was personally
> abhorrent to him. To me, the owner of DataBasix is the David Goldberger
> of usenet, because he too understands and honors the same ideal,
> regardless of his personal feelings. I subscribe to DataBasix, and so
> long as it is in business, I will continue to do so, for that reason
> alone.
>
> The second issue is that just because I believe with my whole heart
what
> I wrote above, I also believe that there are words that should not be
> spoken and that individuals have the obligation to police themselves in
> this regard (as opposed to policing each other). You have a corner on
> the market of such words, Chris, and I find you reprehensible.
>
> With that said, the third and final issue, which is also the point, is
> this: it's not for nothin' that you subscribe to DataBasix, Chris. As
> long as you do not violate the DataBasix AUP, you know you can do
> whatever the **** you feel like, and you are teflon, because Gary's
> commitment to freedom of speech on usenet is unequivocal. The only
> reason you're able to get away with the **** you spew is that your
> provider remains true to an ideal that other providers have allowed to
> erode in the name of convenience.
>
> In other words, you can only talk your bull**** because you're

He can talk his bull**** because Databasix is a home for trolls and
spammers. As long as they don't piss Gary off, you meant to say.

> except to the extent that anyone who messes with you in a way that
> constitutes abuse of the net will pay the price for it, because Gary
> doesn't tolerate that any more than he tolerates a violation of his

What horse****. If someone or a group wanted databasix that bad, they
could take it. The real point is, nobody cares enough to bother to
dedicate the resources it would take anymore. What's the point? adding
databasix to your killfilter ensures very low troll/spam posts.




--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt