Leythos wrote:
> In article <5nim8jFi7dtoU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
> says...
>> Why don't you
>> let John carry this part of the argument? He's got firsthand
>> knowledge and his position, unlike yours, is sound.
>
> First, John had not entered until well past when this started, and
> it's great that he did.

John is logical. That gets big points from me.

He's also evenhanded, and he's willing to examine a different point of
view and he doesn't evade direct response to a statement or question.

I enjoy John. I'm not enjoying this.

> I know what was communicated and what was happening at the time, when
> butts was banned, and TOS violation is a very broad term for what he
> did.
>
> So, like it or not, violating a TOS is unethical and it fits.

We disagree that violating a TOS is unethical, but I've said that
already and I said why.

Unfortunately, you snipped my reason, and I'm not going to write it
again.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...766545e259d53c
Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007
Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007
Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003
NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle