How sweet, I'm "touched" no really that brought tears to my eyes.
Bwaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaahaaa! you're a funny troll.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5nfplrFi3v3oU1@mid.individual.net...
> pcbutts1 wrote:
>> Does the name PA Bear sound familiar? he pissed me off, his actions
>> was the cost of your job. He tried to use his status as an MVP to
>> ruin me, and my job and in the long run all he did was costs others
>> theirs and really pissed off Chris Butts. I saw all his emails. This
>> goes way beyond you. He thought I was some smuck loser with too much
>> time on my hands. You can rest assured he won't mess with me again or
>> NASA.
>
> I do not want what I am about to write to be misconstrued, so I am going
> to separate out the three issues as carefully as I can.
>
> The first issue is that I firmly believe anyone has the *right* to say any
> goddammed annoying, obnoxious, offensive thing that person feels like
> saying, regardless of how goddammed annoying, obnoxious and offensive that
> person and his words might happen to be. Even a sociopath--that means you,
> Chris--is entitled to a voice.
>
> If you take away the right of anyone to speak, you have endangered the
> right of everyone to speak. It's that simple.
>
> For most of my adult life, David Goldberger has been my hero, because he
> understood and honored this concept even when it was personally abhorrent
> to him. To me, the owner of DataBasix is the David Goldberger of usenet,
> because he too understands and honors the same ideal, regardless of his
> personal feelings. I subscribe to DataBasix, and so long as it is in
> business, I will continue to do so, for that reason alone.
>
> The second issue is that just because I believe with my whole heart what I
> wrote above, I also believe that there are words that should not be spoken
> and that individuals have the obligation to police themselves in this
> regard (as opposed to policing each other). You have a corner on the
> market of such words, Chris, and I find you reprehensible.
>
> With that said, the third and final issue, which is also the point, is
> this: it's not for nothin' that you subscribe to DataBasix, Chris. As long
> as you do not violate the DataBasix AUP, you know you can do whatever the
> **** you feel like, and you are teflon, because Gary's commitment to
> freedom of speech on usenet is unequivocal. The only reason you're able to
> get away with the **** you spew is that your provider remains true to an
> ideal that other providers have allowed to erode in the name of
> convenience.
>
> In other words, you can only talk your bull**** because you're protected
> from the consequences (up to the point you violate the AUP, and then
> you're protected from nothing), but that protection is not an endorsement
> of you or your words, it's just the same generic protection that anyone
> with a DataBasix account would receive. Your claims of dire consequences
> to those who mess with you is nothing but lame bull****, except to the
> extent that anyone who messes with you in a way that constitutes abuse of
> the net will pay the price for it, because Gary doesn't tolerate that any
> more than he tolerates a violation of his AUP.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...766545e259d53c
> Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007
> Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007
> Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003
> NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204
>
> Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
> as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
> are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle
>