Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314
Results 131 to 137 of 137

Thread: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

  1. #131
    John Adams Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    Sebastian G. wrote:

    > Because, with respect to the demands of a normal home user, Windows is
    > secure out of the box?


    Hahaha...thanks for the laugh. Now pull the other leg.

  2. #132
    John Adams Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    Sebastian G. wrote:

    > Nothing? So far a recent Windows installation is secure out-of-the-box.


    Come, come, even noobs know that is not true.

    > As an additional recommendation, a global no-exec policy is actually
    > very feasible, since the demands of users typically only change rarely.


    Well, that wouldn't work for me or most other people I know as we are
    always installing new software and games etc.

  3. #133
    John Adams Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    Sebastian G. wrote:

    > Mozilla Seamonkey


    What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox? I don't want a
    browser that is an all-in-one app anyway.


    http://www.seamonkey-project.org/


    > Under the hood, SeaMonkey uses much of the same Mozilla source code which powers such successful siblings as Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, Sunbird and Miro. Legal backing is provided by the Mozilla Foundation.


  4. #134
    Sebastian G. Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    John Adams wrote:


    >> Mozilla Seamonkey

    >
    > What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?



    Competent programmers who actually care for the users?

    > I don't want a browser that is an all-in-one app anyway.



    And the funny thing is that it's still less bloated than Firefox.

  5. #135
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
    @mid.dfncis.de:

    > John Adams wrote:
    >
    >
    >>> Mozilla Seamonkey

    >>
    >> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?

    >
    >
    > Competent programmers who actually care for the users?


    Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or continue to
    ignore them?

    It's painfully obvious you don't know wtf your talking about here and
    haven't for sometime, but I think I've been more than fair with you.



    --
    Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
    Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
    Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
    PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

  6. #136
    Sebastian G. Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    Dustin Cook wrote:

    > "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
    > @mid.dfncis.de:
    >
    >> John Adams wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>> Mozilla Seamonkey
    >>> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?

    >>
    >> Competent programmers who actually care for the users?

    >
    > Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or continue to
    > ignore them?



    If you want a detailed analysis of the differences you'd need to carefully
    study the architecture of the mentioned programs, as well as the
    configuration of the particular components.

    One classical example: Mozilla Firefox doesn't expose the SSL configuration
    options and has all weak chiffre/hash options allowed by default.

  7. #137
    Dustin Cook Guest

    Re: Jetico Personal Firewall freeware asks way to many questions

    "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
    news:5qlqgoF10b33tU1@mid.dfncis.de:

    > Dustin Cook wrote:
    >
    >> "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
    >> @mid.dfncis.de:
    >>
    >>> John Adams wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>> Mozilla Seamonkey
    >>>> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?
    >>>
    >>> Competent programmers who actually care for the users?

    >>
    >> Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or
    >> continue to ignore them?

    >
    >
    > If you want a detailed analysis of the differences you'd need to
    > carefully study the architecture of the mentioned programs, as well as
    > the configuration of the particular components.
    >
    > One classical example: Mozilla Firefox doesn't expose the SSL
    > configuration options and has all weak chiffre/hash options allowed by
    > default.
    >


    I wasn't talking about Firefox. I was talking about your comments related
    to BugHunter, specifically.


    --
    Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
    Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
    Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
    Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
    PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •