Sebastian G. wrote:
> Because, with respect to the demands of a normal home user, Windows is
> secure out of the box?
Hahaha...thanks for the laugh. Now pull the other leg.
Sebastian G. wrote:
> Because, with respect to the demands of a normal home user, Windows is
> secure out of the box?
Hahaha...thanks for the laugh. Now pull the other leg.
Sebastian G. wrote:
> Nothing? So far a recent Windows installation is secure out-of-the-box.
Come, come, even noobs know that is not true.
> As an additional recommendation, a global no-exec policy is actually
> very feasible, since the demands of users typically only change rarely.
Well, that wouldn't work for me or most other people I know as we are
always installing new software and games etc.
Sebastian G. wrote:
> Mozilla Seamonkey
What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox? I don't want a
browser that is an all-in-one app anyway.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
> Under the hood, SeaMonkey uses much of the same Mozilla source code which powers such successful siblings as Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, Sunbird and Miro. Legal backing is provided by the Mozilla Foundation.
John Adams wrote:
>> Mozilla Seamonkey
>
> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?
Competent programmers who actually care for the users?
> I don't want a browser that is an all-in-one app anyway.
And the funny thing is that it's still less bloated than Firefox.
"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
@mid.dfncis.de:
> John Adams wrote:
>
>
>>> Mozilla Seamonkey
>>
>> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?
>
>
> Competent programmers who actually care for the users?
Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or continue to
ignore them?
It's painfully obvious you don't know wtf your talking about here and
haven't for sometime, but I think I've been more than fair with you.
--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt
Dustin Cook wrote:
> "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
> @mid.dfncis.de:
>
>> John Adams wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Mozilla Seamonkey
>>> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?
>>
>> Competent programmers who actually care for the users?
>
> Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or continue to
> ignore them?
If you want a detailed analysis of the differences you'd need to carefully
study the architecture of the mentioned programs, as well as the
configuration of the particular components.
One classical example: Mozilla Firefox doesn't expose the SSL configuration
options and has all weak chiffre/hash options allowed by default.
"Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in
news:5qlqgoF10b33tU1@mid.dfncis.de:
> Dustin Cook wrote:
>
>> "Sebastian G." <seppi@seppig.de> wrote in news:5qjfduFvlpftU1
>> @mid.dfncis.de:
>>
>>> John Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Mozilla Seamonkey
>>>> What makes Seamonkey a safer browser than Firefox?
>>>
>>> Competent programmers who actually care for the users?
>>
>> Do you intend to address my questions directed to you sir? Or
>> continue to ignore them?
>
>
> If you want a detailed analysis of the differences you'd need to
> carefully study the architecture of the mentioned programs, as well as
> the configuration of the particular components.
>
> One classical example: Mozilla Firefox doesn't expose the SSL
> configuration options and has all weak chiffre/hash options allowed by
> default.
>
I wasn't talking about Firefox. I was talking about your comments related
to BugHunter, specifically.
--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)