"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.217a83a481c5c2989ad0@adfree.Usenet.com...
> In article <47104095$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Spam@free says...
>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
>> news:feouo1$lv5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> > You are the only one promoting my websites.
>>
>> Not very often that I agree with you. Lythos seems to have no 'resist
>> temptation' button and you keep not pressing it )
>
> It's not about resisting "temptation", he's not worth being tempted
> for/over or about. It's about exposing him each time he unethically
> requires me to defend my name - and showing innocent people about his
> true self, by telling them (not showing them) about the filth on his
> site is the best method I can think of.
>
> I also just noticed, when reading my sig, that I was spamming his
> website name in my sig, which I didn't want to do, so, I've changed it,
> again, and he'll claim I had to change it - so I can put it back when he
> tells that lie, but I'll defend my name each time he posts it.
>
> --
> Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)
>
> Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like pcbutts1 that
> create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
> at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
> http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
> to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
> You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
> 'exposed to kids'.

Shouldn't that be "defend your nom de plume" }