Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>> In article <femiv5$6e2$1@registered.motzarella.org>, X-No-
>> archive@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
>>>> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
>>>> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
>>>> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of
>>>> erotica and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on
>>>> pcbutts' links is slim to none (leaning towards none).
>>>>
>>> Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make
>>> a point before one risks becoming overbearing.
>>
>> yea, but like community service announcements, it's worth the risk.
>
> Speaking as a denizen of his sig, as well as one of the subjects of
> his "art," I respectfully disagree.
>
> I think that making an issue of butts' petty little vengence just
> feeds his glee at the repeated failures to shut him down. Fighting a
> genuine ethical violation--the intellectual property theft--is a
> valid endeavor, and I would suggest that soliciting donations on
> behalf of the victims of that theft so that they can take him to
> court is the way to go. But the incessant *****ing and whining about
> "porn, porn, porn" removes the focus from where it truly belongs. I
> suspect, too, that it has probably put you in more than a few
> killfiles, because it's boring.
> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
> limitless. "Porn" is not the issue, Lethyos, even if it is a personal
> issue for you.
>
> Fight him where it hurts. Him, not you.

<non le snip>

Hahahahahahahaha, Lethyos, Oi loik it. Where *do* you dig them up from?