In article <thljg3tj6u6g35qdbooc4p0ddkps0pjirk@4ax.com>, lanic@adria.net
says...
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:12:57 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
> >If you consider downloading what is suggested as anti-malware code from
> >a porno hosting site, from a suspected hack, and warning people about it
> >to be a kook think, then I bet not.
>
> Sure, but seems to me that those exposing a kook/hack are usually their
> colegues. "Exposed to Kids" LOL
So, are you just a kid yourself? If you consider that exposing kids to
PORN is a crime, it makes anything else he does very suspect, and if you
take into account his ethics history, there is no reason to trust
anything he says anywhere.
He doesn't even tell you upfront that his hack tool will block access to
malware removal tools from reputable sites and doesn't often tell you
that it will screw with your Outlook Express to block posts from me -
provided he doesn't screw up anything else in Outlook Express. He also
doesn't have a web page detailing the workings/functions of the tools
and you have to email him for a password - because he thinks that it
protects him from the owners of the code he's copied and claimed is his.
--
Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)
Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.


Reply With Quote
)))