Remove-it v 14 released

[Joosy]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
news:feouo1$lv5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> You are the only one promoting my websites.

Not very often that I agree with you. Lythos seems to have no 'resist
temptation' button and you keep not pressing it )


--
Stevie
"Build a man a fire and he will be warm for one night. Set a man on fire,
and he will be warm for the rest of his life."
~ Sun-Tzu on Fire

[Black Watch]

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
> Leythos wrote:
>> In article <femiv5$6e2$1@registered.motzarella.org>, X-No-
>> archive@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
>>>> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
>>>> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
>>>> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of
>>>> erotica and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on
>>>> pcbutts' links is slim to none (leaning towards none).
>>>>
>>> Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make
>>> a point before one risks becoming overbearing.
>>
>> yea, but like community service announcements, it's worth the risk.
>
> Speaking as a denizen of his sig, as well as one of the subjects of
> his "art," I respectfully disagree.
>
> I think that making an issue of butts' petty little vengence just
> feeds his glee at the repeated failures to shut him down. Fighting a
> genuine ethical violation--the intellectual property theft--is a
> valid endeavor, and I would suggest that soliciting donations on
> behalf of the victims of that theft so that they can take him to
> court is the way to go. But the incessant *****ing and whining about
> "porn, porn, porn" removes the focus from where it truly belongs. I
> suspect, too, that it has probably put you in more than a few
> killfiles, because it's boring.
> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
> limitless. "Porn" is not the issue, Lethyos, even if it is a personal
> issue for you.
>
> Fight him where it hurts. Him, not you.

<non le snip>

Hahahahahahahaha, Lethyos, Oi loik it. Where *do* you dig them up from?

[Leythos]

In article <47104095$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Spam@free says...
> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
> news:feouo1$lv5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > You are the only one promoting my websites.
>
> Not very often that I agree with you. Lythos seems to have no 'resist
> temptation' button and you keep not pressing it )

It's not about resisting "temptation", he's not worth being tempted
for/over or about. It's about exposing him each time he unethically
requires me to defend my name - and showing innocent people about his
true self, by telling them (not showing them) about the filth on his
site is the best method I can think of.

I also just noticed, when reading my sig, that I was spamming his
website name in my sig, which I didn't want to do, so, I've changed it,
again, and he'll claim I had to change it - so I can put it back when he
tells that lie, but I'll defend my name each time he posts it.

--
Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like pcbutts1 that
create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Double Z]

> IAWTP.

whatzat? sorry i've been away from the groups for a while

[jomama]

On Oct 12, 4:07 pm, "pcbutts1" <pcbut...@leythosthestalker.com> wrote:
> Get real. You are the only kid that visits newsgroups. You are the only one
> promoting my websites. Tell everyone why newsfeeds.com pulled your account
> for spamming my website until you changed your sig.
>
> --
>
> Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine herehttp://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
> The list grows. Leythos the stalkerhttp://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
> H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
> Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell
>
> "Leythos" <v...@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.217928f88239b327989ab9@adfree.Usenet.com. ..
>
>
>
> > In article <5n90rmFh6d6...@mid.individual.net>, rhonda...@gmail.com
> > says...
> >> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
> >> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
> >> limitless.
>
> > But the places that host the same crap as he does are not posting here
> > claiming to help others, not posting here claiming to be ethical, not
> > posting here for mothers and grandmothers to connect to their sites like
> > porno butts does.
>
> > --
> > Leythos - spam999f...@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)
>
> > Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
> > create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
> > at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
> >http://forums.speedguide.net/archive...223485.htmlall exposed
> > to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
> > You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
> > 'exposed to kids'.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

your son patty

[jen]

"Double Z" <zzinkmetairie@nospammingplzbellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:rIadnVK8mNl1rYzanZ2dnUVZ_vumnZ2d@giganews.com ...
>> IAWTP.
> whatzat? sorry i've been away from the groups for a while

IAWTP
Acronym: I Agree With This Post.
Normally used on bulletin board systems.

in reply to another post on a message board: IAWTP!

HTH,
-jen

[Double Z]

> IAWTP
> Acronym: I Agree With This Post.
> Normally used on bulletin board systems.
> in reply to another post on a message board: IAWTP!

TYFCTU!

[jen]

"Double Z" <zzinkmetairie@nospammingplzbellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:BPudnRpt9J6d9YzanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@giganews.com ...
>> IAWTP
>> Acronym: I Agree With This Post.
>> Normally used on bulletin board systems.
>> in reply to another post on a message board: IAWTP!
> TYFCTU!
YW

[Joosy]

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.217a83a481c5c2989ad0@adfree.Usenet.com...
> In article <47104095$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>, Spam@free says...
>> "pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
>> news:feouo1$lv5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> > You are the only one promoting my websites.
>>
>> Not very often that I agree with you. Lythos seems to have no 'resist
>> temptation' button and you keep not pressing it )
>
> It's not about resisting "temptation", he's not worth being tempted
> for/over or about. It's about exposing him each time he unethically
> requires me to defend my name - and showing innocent people about his
> true self, by telling them (not showing them) about the filth on his
> site is the best method I can think of.
>
> I also just noticed, when reading my sig, that I was spamming his
> website name in my sig, which I didn't want to do, so, I've changed it,
> again, and he'll claim I had to change it - so I can put it back when he
> tells that lie, but I'll defend my name each time he posts it.
>
> --
> Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)
>
> Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like pcbutts1 that
> create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
> at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
> http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
> to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
> You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
> 'exposed to kids'.

Shouldn't that be "defend your nom de plume" }