Remove-it v 14 released

[Leythos]

In article <5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <Xns99C3E42EDDB07HHI2948AJD832@69.28.186.121>,
> > bughunter.dustin@gmail.com says...
> >> As a side note, You are one sick ****ing dude.. seriously. To
> >> collect the material you needed to put that piece together, ****
> >> man, you need serious ****ing help.
> >
> > Just look at the PORNO on his website, he's absolutely a sick MF.
> > Only a really ill person could pirate parts of porn from others and
> > then want to edit them and then claim they were his own works - and
> > he doesn't even protect kids from being exposed to it.
>
> Leythos,
>
> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of erotica
> and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on pcbutts'
> links is slim to none (leaning towards none).

Yea, I could, but that would mean that I should/must ignore the ethical
issue of him pointing kids and grannies to his porno hosting site,
something that a real malware fighter would never do. Most of the people
that get suckered by him are surprised to learn about his filth and
never go back to his site again - and they seem to spread the word on
their own :-)

--
Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[joe black]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of erotica
> and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on pcbutts' links
> is slim to none (leaning towards none).
>
Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make a point
before one risks becoming overbearing.

[Leythos]

In article <femiv5$6e2$1@registered.motzarella.org>, X-No-
archive@invalid.invalid says...
>
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
> > You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
> > issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
> > **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
> > obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of erotica
> > and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on pcbutts' links
> > is slim to none (leaning towards none).
> >
> Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make a point
> before one risks becoming overbearing.

yea, but like community service announcements, it's worth the risk.

--
Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

Leythos wrote:
> In article <femiv5$6e2$1@registered.motzarella.org>, X-No-
> archive@invalid.invalid says...
>>
>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
>>> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
>>> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
>>> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of
>>> erotica and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on
>>> pcbutts' links is slim to none (leaning towards none).
>>>
>> Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make
>> a point before one risks becoming overbearing.
>
> yea, but like community service announcements, it's worth the risk.

Speaking as a denizen of his sig, as well as one of the subjects of his
"art," I respectfully disagree.

I think that making an issue of butts' petty little vengence just feeds
his glee at the repeated failures to shut him down. Fighting a genuine
ethical violation--the intellectual property theft--is a valid endeavor,
and I would suggest that soliciting donations on behalf of the victims
of that theft so that they can take him to court is the way to go. But
the incessant *****ing and whining about "porn, porn, porn" removes the
focus from where it truly belongs. I suspect, too, that it has probably
put you in more than a few killfiles, because it's boring.

It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
limitless. "Porn" is not the issue, Lethyos, even if it is a personal
issue for you.

Fight him where it hurts. Him, not you.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...766545e259d53c
Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007
Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007
Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003
NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

[Leythos]

In article <5n90rmFh6d6mU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
says...
> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
> limitless.

But the places that host the same crap as he does are not posting here
claiming to help others, not posting here claiming to be ethical, not
posting here for mothers and grandmothers to connect to their sites like
porno butts does.

--
Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)

Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
'exposed to kids'.

[lanic@adria.net]

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:47:55 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>But the places that host the same crap as he does are not posting here
>claiming to help others, not posting here claiming to be ethical, not
>posting here for mothers and grandmothers to connect to their sites like
>porno butts does.

I see your point. Imagine the damage done to a granny that has been
exposed to one of his german shizer video.

Chances are that granny arrived there via your sig...

[Double Z]

> Chances are that granny arrived there via your sig...

Yah, you're encouraging others to visit his site whether you realize it or
not.

[pcbutts1]

What did you forget already? The alleged victim, who btw stole the program
from me, did take up a collection for a lawsuit and guess what? the thief
stole their money. Took all those donations from the fools who believed him
and spent their money.


--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5n90rmFh6d6mU1@mid.individual.net...
> Leythos wrote:
>> In article <femiv5$6e2$1@registered.motzarella.org>, X-No-
>> archive@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhondalea@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5n1467FfmlpnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> You'd do a lot better if you would just stick to the real
>>>> issue--intellectual property theft, because the whole <screaming>
>>>> **PORNO** </screaming> schtik is making you look just a teensy bit
>>>> obsessive. I understand your point, but the internet is full of
>>>> erotica and pornography, and the likelihood of any kids clicking on
>>>> pcbutts' links is slim to none (leaning towards none).
>>>>
>>> Yes, there is a subjective limit to the number of times one can make
>>> a point before one risks becoming overbearing.
>>
>> yea, but like community service announcements, it's worth the risk.
>
> Speaking as a denizen of his sig, as well as one of the subjects of his
> "art," I respectfully disagree.
>
> I think that making an issue of butts' petty little vengence just feeds
> his glee at the repeated failures to shut him down. Fighting a genuine
> ethical violation--the intellectual property theft--is a valid endeavor,
> and I would suggest that soliciting donations on behalf of the victims of
> that theft so that they can take him to court is the way to go. But the
> incessant *****ing and whining about "porn, porn, porn" removes the focus
> from where it truly belongs. I suspect, too, that it has probably put you
> in more than a few killfiles, because it's boring.
>
> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
> limitless. "Porn" is not the issue, Lethyos, even if it is a personal
> issue for you.
>
> Fight him where it hurts. Him, not you.
>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> AUK Galactic Killfile, 15 May 2007
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...766545e259d53c
> Winner, Golden Killfile, April 2007
> Co-Office Holder, Ministry of Circle Jerks, April and May 2007
> Member, Human O-Ring Society, March 2003
> NCB#16 BJDS#2 INAC#77 PSLCK#1 SBG#1 A-29204
>
> Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
> as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
> are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle
>

[pcbutts1]

Get real. You are the only kid that visits newsgroups. You are the only one
promoting my websites. Tell everyone why newsfeeds.com pulled your account
for spamming my website until you changed your sig.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.217928f88239b327989ab9@adfree.Usenet.com. ..
> In article <5n90rmFh6d6mU1@mid.individual.net>, rhondalea@gmail.com
> says...
>> It's as I said before, the 'net is full of porn, and the potential for
>> children to be exposed to far worse than what is on butts' pages is
>> limitless.
>
> But the places that host the same crap as he does are not posting here
> claiming to help others, not posting here claiming to be ethical, not
> posting here for mothers and grandmothers to connect to their sites like
> porno butts does.
>
> --
> Leythos - spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 to email me)
>
> Fight exposing kids to porn, complain about sites like PCBUTTS1.COM that
> create filth and put it on the web for any kid to see: Just take a look
> at some of the FILTH he's created and put on his website:
> http://forums.speedguide.net/archive.../t-223485.html all exposed
> to children (the link I've include does not directly display his filth).
> You can find the same information by googling for 'PCBUTTS1' and
> 'exposed to kids'.

[---Fitz---]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in message
news:feouo1$lv5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> Get real. You are the only kid that visits newsgroups.

Apparently not. You must have visited some to get those pictures or else
you posed for them. Which is it?