<hal@not.here.com> wrote in message
news:diape31ng2snb5q4ovq5jl9361opf2b3dh@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:59:17 -0500, hal@not.here.com wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:28:07 -0500, "VanguardLH"
>><VanguardLH@mail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>hal wrote ...
>>>> I've recovered from my Spy Sweeper debacle and downloaded
>>>> SUPERAntiSpyware. I see it is supposed to have 'real time'
>>>> protection
>>>> built into it. Has anyone ever had it catch something in 'real
>>>> time?'
>>>
>>>
>>>Nope, but then I have yet to be infected (as can be so far detected by
>>>the suite of anti-malware tools that I use). SuperAntispyware
>>>cripples itself after the trial period so you don't get real-time
>>>(on-access) protection. Still makes for a good on-demand scanner,
>>>though, and why I immediately disabled the on-access protection since
>>>it was going to disappear anyway.
>>>
>>
>>You didn't think enuf of it to keep it?
>
> I meant buy it, not merely keep the freebie version.

Well I've never bought it for myself, but I have encouraged several
customers to buy it. In fact, if they demand html rendering of email I raise
hell if they don't buy it.

cmsix