On Sep 16, 2:18 am, h...@not.here.com wrote:
> Here is the last paragraph of the review athttp://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2127239,00.asp
>
> "SUPERAntiSpyware costs the same as the non-AntiVirus versions of Spy
> Sweeper and Spyware Doctor, but in my testing, it didn't remove malware
> as well as those two. And it did even worse at keeping malware out of a
> clean system. It installs quickly, scans quickly, and doesn't bog down
> your system, which is good. The problem is that SAS needs to get better
> at doing its primary job-removing malware and keeping it out of a clean
> system. Until then, I can't recommend it."
>
> Bummer. I'm now thinking of trying Spyware Doctor if it come w/o the AV
> part. At least this time I didn't get stuck for any money by using the
> trial version.
>
> Oh, yeah. I sent a copy of my previous post regarding Spy Sweeper to
> Webroot and asked for a refund. When I think about them reading it, I
> gotta chuckle. Lot's of luck on my getting a refund.
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

If you read the review, we basically scored the same on malware
removal (what we do) as the top programs - we got dinged because we
didn't detect or remove keyloggers, which we had informed Neil before
he did the review. Neil also didn't mention that we have a Free
Edition that detects and removes the same as the top programs.

No single product can catch everything on a given day, that's the
bottom line. We often detect and remove spyware/malware that the
other's miss, that's why we have millions of users.