Re: Webroot's Spy Sweeper Bombs Out BIG Time.

[use_a_hammer2@yahoo.com]

On Sep 14, 5:17 pm, h...@not.here.com wrote:
> Well, I just bought the program the other day. Right from the start, I
> did have problems with loading Kaspersky AV after installing Spy
> Sweeper. After a few reboots, everything seemed to be working okay,
> even though I found Spy Sweeper to be a real memory hog. However, in
> the last 24 hours, I found it to be a real pain in arse to the point
> where I finally uninstalled it.
>
> It began by conflicting with my Kaspersky AV. Then I noticed Tea Timer
> having problems with Spy Sweeper. Thinking that many people in the past
> have had problems running Spybot's Tea Timer, even though I haven't had
> any problems with it for years, I decided to sacrifice Tea Timer and
> turned it off.
>
> Then Spy Sweeper began anew with keeping Kaspersky from loading at
> times. Then it destroyed my firewall by locking up the comp after I had
> updated Spy Sweeper and did a sweep with it. No key would work. The
> comp would freeze completely, stranding my Best Crypt drives in the wide
> open position, forcing me to boot the machine in order to regain
> control. My firewall paid the price after a few times of this nonsense.
>
> The dang program even locked out certain other programs from working,
> such as Directory Snoop. It also forced me to double click a number of
> times on CleanCache, which simply wouldn't respond for about 30 seconds
> or so after my clicking on it. Even then, it would go right to the
> system tray instead of opening.
>
> So I decided I would turn off Spy Sweeper, keeping it from booting, and
> using it only in an On Demand fashion for sweeps. Well, I'll tell you
> that little bas***d didn't appreciate that at all. The s.o.b. thing went
> on an interminable sweep when called up, telling me that different
> pieces of my perfectly good software were a threat. The damn thing
> wouldn't turn off - not even after a cold boot. It came back on with a
> vengeance after I turned the comp back on after the cold boot. Finally,
> I don't know how or why, the dang thing turned itself off, allowing me
> to click on the system tray icon and close the damn thing. THAT'S when I
> had it and uninstalled the bleeping thing before it could re-energize
> itself and come back to life.
>
> KEE-RIST!! I haven't seen crap software like this thing since the days
> of Workshop for Windows 3.1 trying to run Norton crap.
>
> So much for trusting products produced by 'well known' companies.
>
> Enuf are enuf. Goodbye Spy Sweeper. Rot on my drive, nevermore to be
> installed. Matter of fact, now that I think of it, as soon as I
> complete this email, I'm gonna wipe the damn thing from the drive,
> precluding my ever forgetting this lesson and trying to reinstall it
> someday. As they say, good riddance to bad garbage.
>
> Kiss $25 goodbye.
>
> Lordy! What a mess it had made of a perfectly operating comp.

Like I wrote earlier, over 2 yrs and never a problem. My dad also uses
it and he's never had a problem, and I installed on my friends
computer that I told about (the one with HotBar) and she hasn't had
any problems.

Don't know why you are having so many problems with it.

Why don't you call customer support before ditching it?

http://www.webroot.com/company/contactus.html?

[cmsix]

<hal@not.here.com> wrote in message
news:b4ame3he7dnnmdne9aitjr9kbh1fei93vk@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:21:29 -0700, use_a_hammer2@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>On Sep 14, 5:17 pm, h...@not.here.com wrote:
>>> Well, I just bought the program the other day. Right from the start, I
>>> did have problems with loading Kaspersky AV after installing Spy
>>> Sweeper. After a few reboots, everything seemed to be working okay,
>>> even though I found Spy Sweeper to be a real memory hog. However, in
>>> the last 24 hours, I found it to be a real pain in arse to the point
>>> where I finally uninstalled it.
>>>
>>> It began by conflicting with my Kaspersky AV. Then I noticed Tea Timer
>>> having problems with Spy Sweeper. Thinking that many people in the past
>>> have had problems running Spybot's Tea Timer, even though I haven't had
>>> any problems with it for years, I decided to sacrifice Tea Timer and
>>> turned it off.
>>>
>>> Then Spy Sweeper began anew with keeping Kaspersky from loading at
>>> times. Then it destroyed my firewall by locking up the comp after I had
>>> updated Spy Sweeper and did a sweep with it. No key would work. The
>>> comp would freeze completely, stranding my Best Crypt drives in the wide
>>> open position, forcing me to boot the machine in order to regain
>>> control. My firewall paid the price after a few times of this nonsense.
>>>
>>> The dang program even locked out certain other programs from working,
>>> such as Directory Snoop. It also forced me to double click a number of
>>> times on CleanCache, which simply wouldn't respond for about 30 seconds
>>> or so after my clicking on it. Even then, it would go right to the
>>> system tray instead of opening.
>>>
>>> So I decided I would turn off Spy Sweeper, keeping it from booting, and
>>> using it only in an On Demand fashion for sweeps. Well, I'll tell you
>>> that little bas***d didn't appreciate that at all. The s.o.b. thing went
>>> on an interminable sweep when called up, telling me that different
>>> pieces of my perfectly good software were a threat. The damn thing
>>> wouldn't turn off - not even after a cold boot. It came back on with a
>>> vengeance after I turned the comp back on after the cold boot. Finally,
>>> I don't know how or why, the dang thing turned itself off, allowing me
>>> to click on the system tray icon and close the damn thing. THAT'S when I
>>> had it and uninstalled the bleeping thing before it could re-energize
>>> itself and come back to life.
>>>
>>> KEE-RIST!! I haven't seen crap software like this thing since the days
>>> of Workshop for Windows 3.1 trying to run Norton crap.
>>>
>>> So much for trusting products produced by 'well known' companies.
>>>
>>> Enuf are enuf. Goodbye Spy Sweeper. Rot on my drive, nevermore to be
>>> installed. Matter of fact, now that I think of it, as soon as I
>>> complete this email, I'm gonna wipe the damn thing from the drive,
>>> precluding my ever forgetting this lesson and trying to reinstall it
>>> someday. As they say, good riddance to bad garbage.
>>>
>>> Kiss $25 goodbye.
>>>
>>> Lordy! What a mess it had made of a perfectly operating comp.
>>
>>Like I wrote earlier, over 2 yrs and never a problem. My dad also uses
>>it and he's never had a problem, and I installed on my friends
>>computer that I told about (the one with HotBar) and she hasn't had
>>any problems.
>>
>>Don't know why you are having so many problems with it.
>>
>>Why don't you call customer support before ditching it?
>>
>>http://www.webroot.com/company/contactus.html?
>
> I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
> software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and usually
> know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to the
> 'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
> absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.
>
> Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
> trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence on
> the Net. My mistake.

Well, it used to work, I had it for a couple of years. All of a sudden the
new version(no, I don't remember which one)was a piece of crap. To me it
seemed like they were spending more time on sales than they were on
developement.

If you buy something that give you that much trouble it isn't worth the time
to get them to help you fix it. It should work when you buy it.

SuperAntiSpyware always works for me.

cmsix

>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----

[Gerald309]

---------------------------------/ You Wrote:

""I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and
usually
know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to
the
'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.

Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence
on
the Net. My mistake. ""

REPLY...
In reference to professional tests performed and results posted about
Webroot Spysweeper Support: ..... (brief clip):

Spy Sweeper Reviewer's Comments
http://anti-spyware-review.toptenrev...er-review.html
Help/Support:
Webroot supports Spy Sweeper through embedded help, online FAQs and
email support. Unlike many software providers, Webroot provides free
toll-free support. They answered our phone calls and emails promptly.

So my friend, your comments about poor product Support certainly do
not apply to Webroot Spysweeper. Again, I am not promoting Webroot - I
am promoting Computing Safety which in turn needs getting rid of "old
wives tales" or just plain lying about security protection software.
Well, that may be taken as offense but is not and raises the question
rather that if you were to give your opinion - what do you recommend
to everyone as an adware/spyware catagory threats protection ?

How about Prevx ? Ever here of them ?

Prevx Home Anti-Malware: Next Generation Already Here ?
http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=360

[use_a_hammer2@yahoo.com]

On Sep 15, 4:18 am, "cmsix" <cm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> <h...@not.here.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b4ame3he7dnnmdne9aitjr9kbh1fei93vk@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:21:29 -0700, use_a_hamm...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>On Sep 14, 5:17 pm, h...@not.here.com wrote:
> >>> Well, I just bought the program the other day. Right from the start, I
> >>> did have problems with loading Kaspersky AV after installing Spy
> >>> Sweeper. After a few reboots, everything seemed to be working okay,
> >>> even though I found Spy Sweeper to be a real memory hog. However, in
> >>> the last 24 hours, I found it to be a real pain in arse to the point
> >>> where I finally uninstalled it.
>
> >>> It began by conflicting with my Kaspersky AV. Then I noticed Tea Timer
> >>> having problems with Spy Sweeper. Thinking that many people in the past
> >>> have had problems running Spybot's Tea Timer, even though I haven't had
> >>> any problems with it for years, I decided to sacrifice Tea Timer and
> >>> turned it off.
>
> >>> Then Spy Sweeper began anew with keeping Kaspersky from loading at
> >>> times. Then it destroyed my firewall by locking up the comp after I had
> >>> updated Spy Sweeper and did a sweep with it. No key would work. The
> >>> comp would freeze completely, stranding my Best Crypt drives in the wide
> >>> open position, forcing me to boot the machine in order to regain
> >>> control. My firewall paid the price after a few times of this nonsense.
>
> >>> The dang program even locked out certain other programs from working,
> >>> such as Directory Snoop. It also forced me to double click a number of
> >>> times on CleanCache, which simply wouldn't respond for about 30 seconds
> >>> or so after my clicking on it. Even then, it would go right to the
> >>> system tray instead of opening.
>
> >>> So I decided I would turn off Spy Sweeper, keeping it from booting, and
> >>> using it only in an On Demand fashion for sweeps. Well, I'll tell you
> >>> that little bas***d didn't appreciate that at all. The s.o.b. thing went
> >>> on an interminable sweep when called up, telling me that different
> >>> pieces of my perfectly good software were a threat. The damn thing
> >>> wouldn't turn off - not even after a cold boot. It came back on with a
> >>> vengeance after I turned the comp back on after the cold boot. Finally,
> >>> I don't know how or why, the dang thing turned itself off, allowing me
> >>> to click on the system tray icon and close the damn thing. THAT'S when I
> >>> had it and uninstalled the bleeping thing before it could re-energize
> >>> itself and come back to life.
>
> >>> KEE-RIST!! I haven't seen crap software like this thing since the days
> >>> of Workshop for Windows 3.1 trying to run Norton crap.
>
> >>> So much for trusting products produced by 'well known' companies.
>
> >>> Enuf are enuf. Goodbye Spy Sweeper. Rot on my drive, nevermore to be
> >>> installed. Matter of fact, now that I think of it, as soon as I
> >>> complete this email, I'm gonna wipe the damn thing from the drive,
> >>> precluding my ever forgetting this lesson and trying to reinstall it
> >>> someday. As they say, good riddance to bad garbage.
>
> >>> Kiss $25 goodbye.
>
> >>> Lordy! What a mess it had made of a perfectly operating comp.
>
> >>Like I wrote earlier, over 2 yrs and never a problem. My dad also uses
> >>it and he's never had a problem, and I installed on my friends
> >>computer that I told about (the one with HotBar) and she hasn't had
> >>any problems.
>
> >>Don't know why you are having so many problems with it.
>
> >>Why don't you call customer support before ditching it?
>
> >>http://www.webroot.com/company/contactus.html?
>
> > I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
> > software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and usually
> > know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to the
> > 'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
> > absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.
>
> > Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
> > trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence on
> > the Net. My mistake.
>
> Well, it used to work, I had it for a couple of years. All of a sudden the
> new version(no, I don't remember which one)was a piece of crap. To me it
> seemed like they were spending more time on sales than they were on
> developement.
>
> If you buy something that give you that much trouble it isn't worth the time
> to get them to help you fix it. It should work when you buy it.
>
> SuperAntiSpyware always works for me.
>
> cmsix
>
>

It still works, it just doesn't work for him for some reason.

While in the grocery store this morning I noticed that PC Magazine ( I
think it was PC Mag I was in a hurry) had a top ten list of anti
spyware programs and they had Spy Sweeper ranked 3rd.

[use_a_hammer2@yahoo.com]

On Sep 15, 6:29 am, Gerald309 <gerald...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------------------------------/ You Wrote:
>
> ""I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
> software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and
> usually
> know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to
> the
> 'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
> absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.
>
> Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
> trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence
> on
> the Net. My mistake. ""
>
> REPLY...
> In reference to professional tests performed and results posted about
> Webroot Spysweeper Support: ..... (brief clip):
>
> Spy Sweeper Reviewer's Commentshttp://anti-spyware-review.toptenreviews.com/spy-sweeper-review.html
> Help/Support:
> Webroot supports Spy Sweeper through embedded help, online FAQs and
> email support. Unlike many software providers, Webroot provides free
> toll-free support. They answered our phone calls and emails promptly.
>
> So my friend, your comments about poor product Support certainly do
> not apply to Webroot Spysweeper. Again, I am not promoting Webroot - I
> am promoting Computing Safety which in turn needs getting rid of "old
> wives tales" or just plain lying about security protection software.
> Well, that may be taken as offense but is not and raises the question
> rather that if you were to give your opinion - what do you recommend
> to everyone as an adware/spyware catagory threats protection ?
>
> How about Prevx ? Ever here of them ?
>
> Prevx Home Anti-Malware: Next Generation Already Here ?
> http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=360

I tried Prevx when it was offered for free at http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/
a couple of months ago and encountered similar problems to what the OP
is experiencing with SS.

Locked up my computer several times while trying to run a sweep, and
then I had a hell of a time removing the program from my computer.

[cmsix]

Who wrote you dumbass. You choped off the part of the message that told who
you were replying to. See that little header just below where I'm top
posting. That's the part you snipped out of you message. The part that told
who you were replying to. IDIOT!

cmsix

"Gerald309" <gerald309@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189852147.854152.125740@g4g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
> ---------------------------------/ You Wrote:
>
> ""I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
> software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and
> usually
> know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to
> the
> 'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
> absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.
>
> Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
> trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence
> on
> the Net. My mistake. ""
>
> REPLY...
> In reference to professional tests performed and results posted about
> Webroot Spysweeper Support: ..... (brief clip):
>
> Spy Sweeper Reviewer's Comments
> http://anti-spyware-review.toptenrev...er-review.html
> Help/Support:
> Webroot supports Spy Sweeper through embedded help, online FAQs and
> email support. Unlike many software providers, Webroot provides free
> toll-free support. They answered our phone calls and emails promptly.
>
> So my friend, your comments about poor product Support certainly do
> not apply to Webroot Spysweeper. Again, I am not promoting Webroot - I
> am promoting Computing Safety which in turn needs getting rid of "old
> wives tales" or just plain lying about security protection software.
> Well, that may be taken as offense but is not and raises the question
> rather that if you were to give your opinion - what do you recommend
> to everyone as an adware/spyware catagory threats protection ?
>
> How about Prevx ? Ever here of them ?
>
> Prevx Home Anti-Malware: Next Generation Already Here ?
> http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=360
>

[cmsix]

<use_a_hammer2@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1189865642.681274.86720@22g2000hsm.googlegrou ps.com...
> On Sep 15, 4:18 am, "cmsix" <cm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> <h...@not.here.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b4ame3he7dnnmdne9aitjr9kbh1fei93vk@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:21:29 -0700, use_a_hamm...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >>On Sep 14, 5:17 pm, h...@not.here.com wrote:
>> >>> Well, I just bought the program the other day. Right from the start,
>> >>> I
>> >>> did have problems with loading Kaspersky AV after installing Spy
>> >>> Sweeper. After a few reboots, everything seemed to be working okay,
>> >>> even though I found Spy Sweeper to be a real memory hog. However, in
>> >>> the last 24 hours, I found it to be a real pain in arse to the
>> >>> point
>> >>> where I finally uninstalled it.
>>
>> >>> It began by conflicting with my Kaspersky AV. Then I noticed Tea
>> >>> Timer
>> >>> having problems with Spy Sweeper. Thinking that many people in the
>> >>> past
>> >>> have had problems running Spybot's Tea Timer, even though I haven't
>> >>> had
>> >>> any problems with it for years, I decided to sacrifice Tea Timer and
>> >>> turned it off.
>>
>> >>> Then Spy Sweeper began anew with keeping Kaspersky from loading at
>> >>> times. Then it destroyed my firewall by locking up the comp after I
>> >>> had
>> >>> updated Spy Sweeper and did a sweep with it. No key would work. The
>> >>> comp would freeze completely, stranding my Best Crypt drives in the
>> >>> wide
>> >>> open position, forcing me to boot the machine in order to regain
>> >>> control. My firewall paid the price after a few times of this
>> >>> nonsense.
>>
>> >>> The dang program even locked out certain other programs from working,
>> >>> such as Directory Snoop. It also forced me to double click a number
>> >>> of
>> >>> times on CleanCache, which simply wouldn't respond for about 30
>> >>> seconds
>> >>> or so after my clicking on it. Even then, it would go right to the
>> >>> system tray instead of opening.
>>
>> >>> So I decided I would turn off Spy Sweeper, keeping it from booting,
>> >>> and
>> >>> using it only in an On Demand fashion for sweeps. Well, I'll tell
>> >>> you
>> >>> that little bas***d didn't appreciate that at all. The s.o.b. thing
>> >>> went
>> >>> on an interminable sweep when called up, telling me that different
>> >>> pieces of my perfectly good software were a threat. The damn thing
>> >>> wouldn't turn off - not even after a cold boot. It came back on with
>> >>> a
>> >>> vengeance after I turned the comp back on after the cold boot.
>> >>> Finally,
>> >>> I don't know how or why, the dang thing turned itself off, allowing
>> >>> me
>> >>> to click on the system tray icon and close the damn thing. THAT'S
>> >>> when I
>> >>> had it and uninstalled the bleeping thing before it could re-energize
>> >>> itself and come back to life.
>>
>> >>> KEE-RIST!! I haven't seen crap software like this thing since the
>> >>> days
>> >>> of Workshop for Windows 3.1 trying to run Norton crap.
>>
>> >>> So much for trusting products produced by 'well known' companies.
>>
>> >>> Enuf are enuf. Goodbye Spy Sweeper. Rot on my drive, nevermore to be
>> >>> installed. Matter of fact, now that I think of it, as soon as I
>> >>> complete this email, I'm gonna wipe the damn thing from the drive,
>> >>> precluding my ever forgetting this lesson and trying to reinstall it
>> >>> someday. As they say, good riddance to bad garbage.
>>
>> >>> Kiss $25 goodbye.
>>
>> >>> Lordy! What a mess it had made of a perfectly operating comp.
>>
>> >>Like I wrote earlier, over 2 yrs and never a problem. My dad also uses
>> >>it and he's never had a problem, and I installed on my friends
>> >>computer that I told about (the one with HotBar) and she hasn't had
>> >>any problems.
>>
>> >>Don't know why you are having so many problems with it.
>>
>> >>Why don't you call customer support before ditching it?
>>
>> >>http://www.webroot.com/company/contactus.html?
>>
>> > I have a simple rule that helps keep me sane with badly written
>> > software: DON'T call "support" people who read from scripts and usually
>> > know less than I do about the program. Also, NEVER send emails to the
>> > 'support' jerks. They usually come back with a reply that has
>> > absolutely nothing to do with the problem I had asked about.
>>
>> > Besides, I did break one of my main rules this time. I bought before
>> > trying it out. I was suckered-in by Webroot's longstanding presence on
>> > the Net. My mistake.
>>
>> Well, it used to work, I had it for a couple of years. All of a sudden
>> the
>> new version(no, I don't remember which one)was a piece of crap. To me it
>> seemed like they were spending more time on sales than they were on
>> developement.
>>
>> If you buy something that give you that much trouble it isn't worth the
>> time
>> to get them to help you fix it. It should work when you buy it.
>>
>> SuperAntiSpyware always works for me.
>>
>> cmsix
>>
>>
>
> It still works, it just doesn't work for him for some reason.
>
> While in the grocery store this morning I noticed that PC Magazine ( I
> think it was PC Mag I was in a hurry) had a top ten list of anti
> spyware programs and they had Spy Sweeper ranked 3rd.

That would be a deal killer for me right there. A vote of confidence from PC
Mag.

cmsix

>

[use_a_hammer@yahoo.com]

On Sep 15, 11:01 pm, h...@not.here.com wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:59:46 GMT, "cmsix" <cm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Who wrote you dumbass. You choped off the part of the message that told who
> >you were replying to. See that little header just below where I'm top
> >posting. That's the part you snipped out of you message. The part that told
> >who you were replying to. IDIOT!
>
> >cmsix
>
> >"Gerald309" <gerald...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:1189852147.854152.125740@g4g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com...
> >> ---------------------------------/ You Wrote:
>
> Don't waste your time answering that arrogant, pompous, insulting jerk.
>
> And I am speaking about >> >"Gerald309" <gerald...@gmail.com>
>
> I have him killfiled.

Yeah, I'm not the smartest person in the world, but I knew who he was
responding to. lol

[cmsix]

<hal@not.here.com> wrote in message
news:i47pe35e98vb38vq5kldnecgr1tpiok7f7@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:59:46 GMT, "cmsix" <cmsix@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Who wrote you dumbass. You choped off the part of the message that told
>>who
>>you were replying to. See that little header just below where I'm top
>>posting. That's the part you snipped out of you message. The part that
>>told
>>who you were replying to. IDIOT!
>>
>>cmsix
>>
>>"Gerald309" <gerald309@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1189852147.854152.125740@g4g2000hsf.googleg roups.com...
>>> ---------------------------------/ You Wrote:
>
> Don't waste your time answering that arrogant, pompous, insulting jerk.
>
> And I am speaking about >> >"Gerald309" <gerald309@gmail.com>

He must not be very smart either. How can you know much and not be able to
manipulate through a newsgroup thread. Damn, newsgroups have been around a
long time.

cmsix

>
> I have him killfiled.
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----