4Q <paul_zest@hushmail.com> wrote in
news:1186432550.052441.313480@b79g2000hse.googlegr oups.com:

> C J. wrote:
>> I know exactly how BUGHUNTER works... just fine.
>

> Okay idiot let's have it, blow by blow
> technical analysis "exactly how BUG****
> works..."

flunkyQ, You've been telling us what a lousy programmer I am, and how you
are so much better than myself. If that's the case, you should already
know in very technical detail how it works; including how the numbers are
generated. You shouldn't need my help, the source code, samples of the
source code, nor anyone elses help in getting this information. The
executable is freely available for your inspection as well as everyone
elses. I don't see the problem here. Either you can do it, or you can't.

> I'm going to get one of my research buddies to help me with the
> mathematical proof, just so we can verify your findings. We'll give you

You don't need to get anyone to help you with anything if your as good as
you'd like us to believe. You have the skillset to disassemble and
analyze it yourself. I personally, don't think you can, but I won't try
to dispute it any further than I already have. I've told you how it flags
files, and essentially repeated what the documentation mentioned from day
one, crc generation, not string scanning is how it works. It's been that
way since day 1. Where you got the silly notion of string scanner is
beyond me.

> I'm Ready, you can start sending the
> information over now!

For once in your sorry life, I think you should do your own homework.

--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml