<roberto.banfi@email.it> wrote in message
news:1189090536.311468.192580@d55g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Aug 11, 2:51 am, "Victek" <Vic...@xyz.com> wrote:
>> >> You may be right, but can you point me to a review with some data that
>> >> confirms the retail version "just plain sucks"?
>>
>> > I'm not trying to be a smart ass here, but after you've dealt with it
>> > on a
>> > few customer machines you don't need to waste time reading reviews on
>> > the
>> > piece of ****.
>>
>> That's exactly the point - I don't have any experience with it.
>> Apparently
>> you have and it hasn't been good <g>. I don't doubt your experience, and
>> when I hear you and others saying it should be avoided it makes me very
>> cautious. I just prefer to form my opinions based on more objective and
>> in-depth reviews. That way if a customer asks me about it I can say
>> something more then it "just plain sucks".
>
> I'm replying with knowledge due to my experience... I do the windows
> server & client administration in my company and we are running McAfee
> Enterprise suite with ePO server for central deployment and
> management... so I assume we are protected at the best McAfee state-of-
> the-art.
>
> well some of ours clients were infected with a virus that up-to-date
> official (and licensed) McAfee Viruscan couldn't even detect! and AVS
> (that is -and now WAS- Kaspersky lite) detected and cleaned it...
>
> do you think McAfee lite will be better? ;-)
>

I don't, but I'll never know one way or the other. McAfee has been ****ty
for so long that I'll never touch it again. I don't want to get that stuff
on my fingers.

cmsix