On Jul 17, 9:37 pm, cbgerry <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net> wrote:
> Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
>
> http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/fre...earch&aff_id=0
>
> ---------------------
> BugHunter 2.2c freeware - Security & Privacy - Anti-Spam & Anti ...
> BugHunter freeware - DOS based Malware Removal Tool suitable for use
> on a number of operating systems - Freeware Download Box.http://www.freewarebox.com/free_1206...download.html- 24k - Cached
> - Similar pages
> --------------------
>
> SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
> Look up a site report:
>
> Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.
>
> freewarebox.com
> Red Verdict Image: Adware, spyware, or viruses (2)
>
> In our tests, we found downloads on this site that some people
> consider adware, spyware, or other unwanted programs.
>
> Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
> Contact information: Established in Country Popularity
> 2005
> UNITED STATES
>
> A few users
> Automated Web Safety Testing Results for freewarebox.com
> e-mail tests for freewarebox.com:
> Download tests for freewarebox.com:
>
> Downloads we found on this site:
> Download Analysis
>
> Babes Solitaires (babesolwe.exe)
> Adware-RBlast,Spyware-WebHancer
> BitComet 0.61 (BitComet_0.61_setup.exe)
> Sveglia 2.1 (sveglia21.exe)
>
> 1 red download
>
> In our tests, we found downloads on this site that some people
> consider adware, spyware, or other unwanted programs.
>
> Online affiliations for freewarebox.com:
> Link Graph
>
> Linked to green sites
>
> When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
> sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
> Annoyances from freewarebox.com:
> Reviewer and Web site owner comments
> User Review Summary for freewarebox.com
>
> This site is good (1)
> This site spams (0)
> Adware, spyware, or viruses (2)
> Excessive popups (0)
> Phishing or other scams (0)
> Bad shopping experience (0)
> Browser exploit (0)
> freewarebox.com Web site owner comments (1)
>
> Hi,
> more than 6 months we haven't links to reported "red" sites like:
> dailymp3software.com or fwnetwork.com.
> Review or links again.
> Thank you,
> Peter
> Submitted by freewarebox at 2007-04-16 16:58:48
> User Reviews (3)
> page 1 of 1
>
> Posted at 03/25/2007-06:43:33 AM by jjacko2007, Reviewer , View
> profile [ Reputation score: 1 / 9 ]
>
> Rating: Adware, spyware, or viruses
>
> I'm not about to endorse ANYTHING provided by this company. Talk about
> detrimental to the fight against net nuetrality! Let me explain why.
> Progs like the comodo verification engine as first seem like a great
> idea, made to ensure the validity of things like the verisign seals
> you see on a lot of ecommerce websites. IT'S BUNK! Quote taken
> directly from the faq on how it works :
> "Today, larger sites and most banks are registered with us. Smaller
> sites that don't display the green border could be legitimate - but be
> sure to check out their other trust credentials like being hacker
> proof. Then decide for yourself whether to
> purchase from that merchant."http://www.vengine.com/products/vengine/faq.html
> I can tell you how this service is going to be used to pressure
> smaller companies, retailers and website owners who ARE completely
> legit into paying the costs of being added to the comodo database, as
> well as possibly being protected under their "hacker proof" protection
> services (yeah, go ahead and call it extortion if ya want that's what
> it is). When comodo gets a request from verificationengine users by
> dropping an email care of newVEs...@comodo.com, comodo will turn right
> around and take the businesses' name and domain and attack them by
> approaching them with all kinds of pressure full of figures and
> persuasions like the number of people that are either afraid to or
> refuse to buy from them because they don't have a silly little green
> glow around their seal when a comodo user does a mouseover on it. So
> the little guys will be pressured into paying anywhere from 30 bucks a
> month or more for services that really don't do squat for them. IT
> DOESN"T HAVE TO BE LIKE THIS. WE HAVE GOT TO WORK TOGETHER TO SPREAD
> THE WORD ABOUT THINGS LIKE THIS AND HELP PEOPLE TO LEARN THAT COMMON
> SENSE CAN PREVAIL OVER FEAR AND PARANOIA. Because if we don't they're
> gonna take this net nuetrality thing and companies like
> Comodo IP Ltd
> 7 Campus Rd
> Bradford, Yorkshire BD7 1HR,
> UNITED KINGDOM
> +44 1274730505, Fax: +44 1274730909
> domain-ad...@comodogroup.com
> who use people that don't know any better to drive the little guys out
> of business, and before you know it the internet is gonna be nothing
> more than a great big walmart. This thing sounds like it works similar
> to web beacons coooperating with third party cookies (I don't know
> about you but I don't like the idea of it making modifications to the
> way my browser runs - with a little green border around it sounds like
> a kiosk) on the user/client end - something I abhor and do not allow
> (because that's how some companies like webloyalty.com and
> reservationrewards.com are stealing cc info and using it across
> multiple domains).
> No way no how. I do not trust this company (notice it's British owned
> too - yes, I know ewido is british owned but they're a good company
> not like these dirtbags) AT ALL. I hope you all understand the gravity
> of this and what it can and probably will mean if we do nothing.
>
> Their DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY found at
>
> http://www.venginecom/corporate/contact.html
>
> releases them from any liability in the event of user displeasure:
>
> "The program is provided to you "as is" by Comodo and any use by you
> of the program is at your own risk. Comodo does not wa rant that the
> program will operate substantially in accordance with the
> documentation accompanying the program. To the maximum extent
> permitted by law, Comodo disclaims all warranties of any kind, whether
> expressed or implied, in equity or at law, including, without
> limitation, implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a
> particular purpose, and non-infringement.
> Comodo does not warrant that the functions contained in the program
> will meet any Service offering extended to Include On-Demand
> requIrements or needs you may have or that the program wIII operate
> error free or In an uninterrupted fashion, or that any efects or
> errors in the program will be corrected, or that the program is
> compatible with any particular platform. Some
> jurisdictions do not allow the waiver or exclusion of implied
> warranties so they may not apply to you."
>
> EVERYONE please see this for what it REALLY IS. A BIG LOAD, someones
> idea on how to use ignorant computer users/consumers to extort (not
> just)small websites and web companies. I'll be listening and looking
> for ideas on how to send a message to comodo group in a big way that
> their scheme has been exposed. Will probably begin by listing them in
> other consumer watch places.
>
> http://www.freewarebox.com/free_900_...ngine-download
>
> Posted at 06/11/2006-01:38:06 AM by ghekko, Reviewer , View profile
> [ Reputation score: 0 / 9 ]
>
> Rating: Adware, spyware, or viruses
>
> Wants to install some type of free revenue software prior to
> installation of downloaded software
>
> Posted at 02/17/2006-03:17:11 PM by Anonymous Preview User, Reviewer ,
> View profile [ Reputation score: -2 / 9 ]
>
> Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
> Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.
>
> Copyright (c) 2007 McAfee, Inc.
>
> This will be the rating popup - TBD
>
> TOPIC#http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=434
> _________________
> *****BlueCollarPCNet Forum Owner*****http://bluecollarpc.net/phpbb2/index..php
> BLUE COLLAR PC TOOLBAR (freeware)http://bluecollarpc.communitytoolbars.com/

Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site
warnings are certainly not the owner home domain - Dustin Cook
Bughunter. I thought that was quite clear to any reader - it is to me.
So here to avoid the confusion perhaps even caused by Dustin C
clouding the content of those posts seemingly - or perhaps even a
little "snow blind" in anger for the moment not seeing that NONE of
those Red Download sites were his Home Domain as Bughunter Owner
commonly or public well known as Bughunter at bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk ......

So here is the actual 'All Green Download" McAfee Site Advisor Report
- For Dustin Cook Bughunter - the real Owner and Real Bughunter
Product Homepages or Official Bughunter website - however you wish to
word it - or in real world, right, Dustin Cook owner of Bughunter and
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk official domain website "where bughunter
lives on the net" - the Official real Bughunter and real Website to
obtain it from. (I call that explanation dead banged). It is obvious
to anyone reading it. Like one report is even the download
"registered" at Snapfiles.com - so that is what I mean as obvious to
anyone reading it.... like the first thing that hits me there is okay,
the owner must have registered with Snapfiles to sell, distribute, or
offer whatever version of download, whatever descriptive words are
your cup of tea accurately, but that certainly that is OBVIOUSLY not
the bughunter.it-mate.co.uk website. It is the software download at
Snapfiles.com and not at bughunter.it-mate.co.uk in other words. Each
of those RED warning download sites are along the same exact line.

You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a
sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can
appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to
leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
street jargon.

All I can say is you sir, Dustin C, invite chapters. Have you heard
that before ? ( I am just ranting , not expecting answers, I think you
misunderstand too much the "underclass").

Well I am thinking I can add here what I came to say - because
everything below this is information not conversation. I'll try
list...

1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".
2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry
with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I
mean I would. The point is a security software is being offered at -
apparently according to McAfee Site Advisor - at malicious content
websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have
you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not
the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit
aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common
folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting
paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making
the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
"your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -
disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You
actually need to be an "Advanced User" to actually understand and do
things correctly without someone worrying over your back. I call it
'Computer Operator" at their "Station" like having a driver's license
for a Novice their first day behind the wheel. This is who stops in
over my way. And granted, this topic should be a part of the
repertoire as just another vein in the massive place called
cyberspace. So the point was with these type topics - it is quite
necessary for days and days even to resolve things. It can take a lot
of communications. That is what was referred to as the Soap Opera....
that is what this looks like to the average consumer. The average
consumer is extremely pressed for an hour maybe two at a session and
not even on a regular basis as well. Threatwares mess that up bad and
what is worst, trying to find information of how to take care of it
immediately. The majority of people are in a great hurry on the Net -
and that is my reference to long needed conversations being
sarcastically as a "What's this Soap Opera? Let me out of here".. like
I said you severely misunderstand what I say. You completely judge me
wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
Channels.

3) Let me floor this to important information I wished to say as a
bottom line here... So the whole rest of this point is that a sleeping
public may not know the other angles to all this. As far as the Red
zones - there are now in alarming numbers what are called "Disposable
Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the
account without warning. Right back to Yahoo and they would just open
another account until shut down until they finally earned the name in
security as "Disposable accounts". This has obviously translated to
Botherders today reportedly responsible for up to 70 percent or more
of world UCE (spam). This is now a new name "Disposable Domains"
whereby at the same attitude websites are opened and shut down like
the old example of Yahoo email accounts. Point is that with pirated
software or Unauthorized Use someone's software can suddenly appear at
one of these Disposable Domains and the cyber criminals can add
malicious content to the website for drive-by installations of malware
and the worst can even rifle a pirated copy of software and relaunch
it with adware, spyware, and or other malware or all together and more
at the Disposable Domain site.... and we all know how irate that is
going to make the owner of the original software to say the very
least.

4) .... Cut to the chase point is that the Red Zone listed sites can
easily be this in the McAfee Site Advisor Reports. So that I said all
of this to point out that out if missed and that what may have been
missed ORIGINALLY is that Dustin Cook Bughunter bughunter.it-
mate.co.uk DOES NOT appear as a "red download" warning at McAfee Site
Advisor and below I have added that proof that is quite public and
available to the public with a download of Site Advisor installed in
Internet Explorer or Firefox browsers.

I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
----------------------------------------
Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Site Advisor Report On: All Green Download...
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

-------------------------------------------
BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool
BugHunter is a DOS based malware scanner which has a frequently
updated database of signatures as well as engine updates. The program
is designed to quickly ...
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
-------------------------------------------

SiteAdvisor: the Web, tested.
Look up a site report:
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/it-...earch&aff_id=0

Want to add your comments? Log in or Register.

it-mate.co.uk
Green Verdict Image

We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems.

Are you the owner of this site? Leave a comment
Contact information: Country Popularity

A few users
Automated Web Safety Testing Results for it-mate.co.uk
e-mail tests for it-mate.co.uk:

We have not found any e-mail sign-up forms on this site.
Download tests for it-mate.co.uk:

Downloads we found on this site:
Download Analysis

AB Extension Pack 1.1.8 (abep-1_1_8-setup.exe)

AB Extension Pack 1.1.9 (abep-1_1_9-setup.exe)

AbcShortcuts 1.0 (abcshortcutssetup.exe)

AlphaChess (alphachess_setup.exe)

Avant Browser 11.0 Build 25 (Freeware) (absetup.exe)

87 total downloads. See more.

87 green downloads

In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
spyware, and other unwanted programs.

Online affiliations for it-mate.co.uk:
Link Graph

Linked to green sites

When we visited this site, we found that most of its links are to
sites which are safe or have only minor safety/annoyance issues.
Annoyances from it-mate.co.uk:
Reviewer and Web site owner comments
User Review Summary for it-mate.co.uk

This site is good (1)
This site spams (0)
Adware, spyware, or viruses (0)
Excessive popups (0)
Phishing or other scams (0)
Bad shopping experience (0)
Browser exploit (0)
it-mate.co.uk Web site owner comments (0)

Are you the owner of this site? Add a comment
User Reviews (1)

page 1 of 1
Learn more about our reviewer system.
Rating: This site is good

Secure Download and Good Program
Posted at 03/25/2006-11:59:48 AM by Arctic Fox, Reviewer , View
profile [ Reputation score: 2 / 9 ]

page 1 of 1

Not a reviewer, yet? Register and leave a review of this site.
Get fully protected with McAfee Internet Security Suite.

Copyright © 2007 McAfee, Inc.

This will be the rating popup - TBD

[ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are
too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of
Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility
and abuse at my personal addresses. And no I don't answer Unsolicited
Email as rule. Webmaster and Postmaster are NOT personal addresses.
You have said some very cheap things about my email addresses that was
quite unexpected and may be beyond your understanding. Like I said you
talk to your lawyer and he will tell you that you have to be VERY
SPECIFIC WORD FOR WORD WITH EXACT PARTICULARS you "claim" are
"offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am
not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the
circles - "generally just write the webmaster with your objections and
some brief easy reports to support them and the webmaster generally
always complies immediately without legal actions required but
indicated if needed. They will get the message fast if they value
their domain (most all do)". May you please comply. I honestly do not
understand what you are saying as apparently incohesive. I am now - in
these next hours looking at EVERYTHING I posted for what is offensive
and especially under the law as you keep saying. This is on your
behalf Dustin Cook Bughunter - in lieu of common appropriate action by
you. Do you understand so I am not misunderstood Mr. Cook ? You have
made no "formal request for removal" of objectionable material and I
will certainly add in apology if there is due per investigation right
now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF
RIGHT NOW AS ACTING AS IF YOU SENT ME A BILL OF PARTICULARS YOU WISH
REMEDIED IMMEDIATELY OR LEGAL ACTION WILL PURSUE --- SO THAT WITHOUT
SUPPORT OF SAME, LISTED, OR PRESENTED BY YOU PROPERLY PARTICULARLY
LISTING ONE BY ONE BY LAW TO ASK FIRST AND PROSECUTE SECOND (BUT YOU
SIT HERE LYING THAT YOUR ADDRESS IS BLOCKED - YOU HAVE NEVER CONTACTED
THE BLUE COLLAR PC.NET WEBMASTER ADDRESS) --- I WILL ACT AS IF YOU
PROPERLY PRESENTED AND ASSUME BILL OF PARTICULARS ARE - AND LOOK FOR
- ANY POSTINGS OR STATEMENTS THAT DEFAME "DUSTIN COOK BUGHUNTER
bughunter.it-mate.co.uk" MADE BY THE OWNER OF THE BLUE COLLAR PC .NET
DOMAIN BE REMOVED IF AND WHERE POSSIBLE IF THEY EXIST - AND
IMMEDIATELY - AS CEASE AND DESIST OR FACE LEGAL ACTION..... DO YOU
UNDERSTAND MY - I SAID MY - GENOROSITY TO YOU ? ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. THIS
IS NO GAME AS YOU SAID, OR IS IT ??? WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM ???

IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
UNDERSTAND THAT.

GOOD BY MR. COOK - I WILL BE IN TOUCH WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THIS POSTING
WITH FULL RESULTS FOR YOU .... SATISFACTORY ? ASK YOUR LAWYER -
HONESTLY I DOUBT HE WOULD SAY DIFFERENT - VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY
MR.COOK.

BLUECOLLARPC.NET