Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com

[pcbutts1]

Who gives a **** what you think. You complained about me numerous times even
after being told by my provider that it was not spam or abuse. You only
stopped when they threatened to give your information to me if you do it
again. What a ****ing wacko you are. You do NOT own this NG David now ****
off.

--

Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell



"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:wHQni.6435$2o5.3225@trnddc03...
> From: "cbgerry" <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net>
>
> < snip >
>
> |
> | BLUECOLLARPC.NET
>
> Posting the SAME content over and over is considered spam or just plain
> abuse.
>
> This posted reply was seen numerous times. I consider that Usenet abuse.
>
> You are kindly asked to stop this abuse.
>
>
> --
> Dave
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
>
>

[Dustin Cook]

"pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@leythosthestalker.com> wrote in
news:f7p17n$ajf$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> Who gives a **** what you think. You complained about me numerous
> times even after being told by my provider that it was not spam or
> abuse. You only stopped when they threatened to give your information
> to me if you do it again. What a ****ing wacko you are. You do NOT own
> this NG David now **** off.

It's all about proper netiquette, not something you'd understand.
David's information isn't exactly private, he's quiet honest about who he
is and how to contact him, so I have no idea what your trying to imply
here.

No matter how you slice it man, you are still a code thief, but I suspect
you could improve with time. You have done an about face and impressed me
by assisting in the removal of those false alarms. I do thank you for that
information. Which makes me think your not a total lost cause after all.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Dustin Cook]

cbgerry <cbgerry@bluecollarpc.net> wrote in
news:1184859560.477294.98110@d55g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com:

> On Jul 17, 10:35 pm, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net>
> wrote:
>> From: "cbgerry" <cbge...@bluecollarpc.net>
>>
>> | Site Advisor Red Download Warning BUGHUNTER - freewarebox.com
>> |
>>
>> < snip >
>>
>> Please stop abusing this group with your childish rants.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Davehttp://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.htmlhttp://www.ik-c
>> s.c
> om/got-a-virus.htm
>
> Preface: I don't think it was plain to the apparent owner of Bughunter
> that the previous posts that Site Advisor calls Red Download site

<snip rest of this, it's very wordy, I don't understand most of what your
saying because for some reason, you don't use english?>

I believe I mentioned that the urls you provided didn't have anything bad
to say about BugHunter. I believe you did that as revenge on what you
felt was a personal attack on you due to my including your toolbar.

I have reviewed the toolbar again, and I am removing it from the next
signature release; With a full apology forthcoming. I made a mistake and
targetted it too soon, so I'm doing the respectable thing here. It will
be removed in the next signature update and an apology will be issued to
you regarding it. Public apology. Ok?

> You (if you are reading this) Dustin C are a very aggressive person
> apparently and it is extremely hard to have a civil conversation with
> you. You do say a lot of incorrect things about me and curse like a

It's not hard to have a civil conversation with me, Many people have no
trouble doing so; even my enemies. I simply don't understand most of
what your writing. I make my share of mistakes using english, I'm best
known for misplacing words and such, but you can usually get the jest of
what I wrote. Your a different case.

I used to be a very aggresive person, back in my previous badguy days. I
would like to think that's not as bad anymore. However, at the same time,
I will defend my program as best that I can from false claims made
against it. Specifically false claims, that is. I can't very well debate
why the interface looks so bad, etc.


> sailor continually. This is offensive and angering. That is irritating
> in the internet setting because of some major calm here. Well, right,
> to each his own. I am use to the "Family Setting" protocols around at
> different places. My cup of tea. But let me finalize as saying I can

usenet doesn't have family protocols. Fidonet does, depending on the echo
your posting in. But, usenet is essentially wide open territory; it's
been that way since it's conception.

> appreciate your great effort to go out of your way to continually slam
> me as you and I - the Prince and the pauper. Your never have seemed to

I really haven't gone out of my way to slam you sir, I did fail to sign
up an account with you at your forums; but I can't seem to comply with
your rules. and now, alas, i'm officially blacklisted from your pad, so
it doesn't matter.

> leave that out in any of our very brief communications. Orderlys don't
> hang out with Doctors, fair enough - we certainly don't "hang" -
> street jargon.

I realize I did come off a bit harshly with you sir, and I don't mean to
belittle you as badly as I did. It was out of line, and I apologize for
having said various things. However, please don't think in the future
that I don't think your good enough to hang in my circle or anything like
that, I don't do that sorta sillyness.

We are in different fields, and I can only say that I said those things
because I had taken the impression that you thought I was some newbie
punkass on the scene trying to give you a hard time. The posts about
"hackware" probably irked me the most. Some of the best software I've
used/developed you would probably call hackware.

You really have my ilk to thank for the things you can do now on the net
anyway. Geeks/hackers like me wrote the software everything else runs on.
Some of it's poorly written, some isn't. But to claim that a big
company like microsoft is in some way superior to the hacker community,
is a laugh. If Microsoft cared about security in the slightest bit, tools
like BugHunter wouldn't be necessary.

> 1) Your final observation about the toolbar is "Potential Danger".

Correct. Potential danger doesn't qualify it as malware on it's own. I
allowed my personal thoughts to cloud my judgement.

> 2) You are responsible to yourself for copyright violations and
> unauthorized distribution of software you own. I suggest you call your
> lawyer about these. I certainly am not to blame. They are. Get angry

You seem to be mistaken. Those sites have permission to host BugHunter.
The whole attack I made on you was you knowingly trying to find a problem
with BugHunter simply because some of the sites which host it may/have
hosted questionable software. You can say what you want, but you did try
to find problems with the software and you did try to imply via those red
warning links that BugHunter may not be safe software. If that wasn't
what you were trying to do, you wouldn't have titled it BugHunter
specifically and reposted the same thing so often.

I accept your halfassed apology for doing it, but don't assume I or
anyone else was niave enough to fall for your explanation. I was born at
night, but it wasn't last night.

> with them. Have their websites shut down. Have your software
> immediately removed from them. Call your Lawyer about that Mr. Cook.I

Why would I want to do that? I like those sites, they host me.

> websites. Do you really want your product associated with that ? Have

My product is created by a former malware author, as you apparently have
now learned? It's sole purpose is to remove malware, so it's certainly
associated with it.

> you - or are they authorized by your permission to distribute your
> Bughunter ? I mean you see the results by a simple Google Search with
> Site Advisor and how outraged you are at the mere mention of that by
> me. You exploded. Do it to them. They are the cause of this. I am not

One important difference. Mcafee wasn't spamming usenet with links trying
to imply BugHunter isn't safe, you were. It's really no biggie, more
interesting people have tried to discredit BugHunter before. Each day it
remains online and available is just another punch in the nose for the
doubters, and I must say, I'm enjoying every minute of it.

> the cause of the public warnings from Site Advisor that are quite
> public on the internet. First couple of pages of results and there you
> are bang, bang, bang 3 red ones. I mean that in the business / profit

Yes, which have absolutely nothing to do with BugHunter. Your site
advisor warnings don't apply to me. My software is hosted there, fine,
it's not involved in any red warnings and it never has been.

> aspect - and then just change it to freeware then... don't be so
> stringent in interpretation. This is how it appears you are greatly
> misunderstanding what is being said - at least on the side of common

I don't know of too many common folk who'd read usenet, see all these red
site advisor warnings, with BugHunter no less in the topic, and not
assume your intending to say it's bad/malicious. C'mon, who were you
trying to fool here?

> folk. Actually I / we were offering some help, but you stormed past.
> These are the reasons I suddenly blocked membership. I am not getting

I didn't storm past anything, sir. I filled out an account on your forum.
That was all. You sent me a rude email in response, and deleted the
account. You then invited me to create a new one, which I did, using my
username Raid again. You disabled that account and posted my email
address right on your forum, for any spambot to harvest; outright
replacing my username with one of your choosing, in this case, my full
email address.

Very unprofessional of you to say the least. Your site obviously didn't
have an issue with the email address I used to signup, because it's never
had any problems emailing me automated messages, and your rude one I
recived the other day.

> paid for this. This is not something I can change. I am not going to
> have my Forum turned into the Bughunter Soap Opera - roughly making

I'm not paid for BugHunter either sir, I do it as a way to give back for
some of the harm that I caused. And no, it's not donationware either.
While I do invite donations on the website, BugHunter will never ask you
to send me a dime. If you downloaded it from a mirror and you've never
been to it's homepage, you won't even know I accept donations.

It really is 100% freeware. If you want to donate once, great! But I'm
not going to bug you about it, or make you click on any extra buttons or
anything else.

> the point. (You just don't understand the away I talk). In other words
> I am guessing the well known for years traditional Hackers Lounge is
> "your flavor" as they say over in Linux world. I am a medium -

I am what I am. Although this might come as a shock to you, the majority
of my hacker pals are respectable people. Even 4Q has his moments. Oh,
don't let him fool you, he could code hackware if he so desired.

> disseminating information if you will. Actually, threats removal with
> any software is a learning curve for the public. I am just one
> volunteer for average consumerism trying to bridge the gap. You

I appreciate your efforts to help consumers. and I agree, threats removal
isn't something to be taken lightly. So many changes are done to the
system, getting the files alone may not be enough. BugHunter doesn't
offer to help with anything but the executables, but for techie's, thats
more than enough. If the resident code isn't able to defend itself, they
can make the necessary system changes to reverse the effects.


> wrongly it seems continually or maybe you are just mean spirited.
> Whatever... and now this is turning into a soap opera. Cahnge
> Channels.

My apologies. I was only defending my program from what I perceived to be
an attack from you.

> Domains". The spammer yesterday may have opened a free yahoo account
> and started sending UCE (spam) until Yahoo caught them and closed the

Yes, and I understand that. However, BugHunter isn't hosted on a disposal
spammer domain. It's hosted by my friends at it-mate. They are very well
respected antimalware programmers/researchers.

Just because I use yahoo and gmail doesn't mean I'm a spammer. I've had a
yahoo account for almost 10 years now.

> I think this should be plain, and definitely accepted as truth:
> ----------------------------------------
> Site Advisor:Green Download BUGHUNTERbughunter.it-mate.co.uk ...

Oh it is, without a doubt.

> In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware,
> spyware, and other unwanted programs.

I'd like to think so.

> This will be the rating popup - TBD
>
> [ps u betta hope u donn pay fer dhis: "Potential Danger" is my
> apology. I am now reading everything I posted to see if I ever said
> quite literally what you accuse me of. Wait for it - I will make one
> last post. If I did not I will say so. Frankly your communications are


Oh, you did. You've been quick to clear up the mess and I am satisfied
with your efforts. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

> too repulsive and I wished this closed immediately. One of your last
> posts Dustin - you are lying again. You are not blocked from
> communicating with my Official Webmaster Address to Request Removal of

I haven't lied about anything so far, actually. I didn't say I was
blocked from emailing you, I'm blocked from logging in.

> Offensive Material. Ask your lawyer about that - because He/She is
> required by Law under the Federal Trade Commission to do that to
> achieve what you are saying - or aren't? No, I do not answer hostility

My lawyer is a very decent one for this area.


> "offensive" and demand to be removed WITH EXACT CAUSE AND SUPPORT
> THEREOF and can or can not be submitted to the WEBMASTER ADDRESS by
> just yourself or with can be with Assistance of Counsel which
> precludes Court Action if ignored. THAT IS THE LAW DUSTIN COOK. I am

I'm well aware of the law, and I didn't demand for you to remove anything
aside from your cheap attacks on BugHunter and the post where you thought
I or the program had something to do with spammers on your site, that
wasn't true either.

> not trying to be anything but polite with you. You keep raging and
> raging. I don't understand to be quite honest. Like they say in the

Polite? Heh, your concept of piloteness and mine varies greatly in that
case.


> now. DO YOU UNDERSTAND MR.COOK ? I AM GOING TO ACT ON YOUR BEHALF

Yes I do. You don't need to use caps you know. This isn't the 70s
anymore, not everyone is on caps only terminals now.

> IF NONE ARE FOUND YOU WILL LIKELY BE ANSWERING AS WELL TO YOUR
> SEMANTICS WITH "Potential Danger". AND I WELL KNOW YOU PERFECTLY
> UNDERSTAND THAT.

While I do find your threats amusing and without merit, You still have no
reason to issue them.




--
Dustin Cook
Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2c
email: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com.removethis
web..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad..: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml

[Kadaitcha Man]

Dustin Cook <spamfilterineffect.see.sig@nowhere.com> Thou *****son
peasant. Never hung poison on a fouler toad. Ye sniggered:

> <snip rest of this

Ok.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een volle gekielhaalde dildodel.